The efficiency of the anticorrosive ability of benzoic acid (M1), salicylic acid (M2), gallic acid (M3), and phthalic acid (M4) was evaluated using AISI 316 stainless steel (SS) and 0.5 M HCl via the potentiodynamic polarisation method, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, contact angle, and scanning electron microscopy analysis. It was found that while inhibition efficiency increased with increasing concentrations, M4 was a better inhibitor than M1, M2, and M3 under the same concentrations when temperature was increased. The results from different analytic techniques were consistent. The tested inhibitors were adsorbed on the SS surface following the Langmuir isotherm. The difference in anticorrosive effectiveness may be due to the inhibitors’ number of –COOH and –OH groups. Quantum chemical parameters were calculated by the density functional theory at the level of the B3LYP theory with bases 6-31G(d,p) and 6–31 + + G(2d,p). Various parameters were calculated, including the highest occupied (EHOMO) and lowest unoccupied (ELUMO) molecular orbital energies, electronegativity (χ), energy gap (∆E), chemical hardness (η), softness (σ), electronegativity (χ), electrophilicity (ω), and nucleophilicity (ε), to show the anticorrosive properties of M1, M2, M3, and M4.