Landslide susceptibility assessment using novel hybridized methods based on the support vector regression

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107372
Abolfazl Jaafari
{"title":"Landslide susceptibility assessment using novel hybridized methods based on the support vector regression","authors":"Abolfazl Jaafari","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment is a complex task due to the multitude of causative factors, spatial variability, data availability, modeling uncertainty, and validation issues. This study addresses these challenges by proposing two predictive models that hybridize support vector regression (SVR) with two evolutionary algorithms: grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and cuckoo search algorithm (CSA). These models were developed using an extensive geospatial database from northern Iran. Over the training phase, the basic predictive model, developed using SVR, was enhanced by incorporating the GWO and CSA algorithms, resulting in the development of two hybridized models: SVR-GWO and SVR-CSA. Over the validation phase, the performance and effectiveness of each hybridized model were compared to the standalone SVR using several metrics. Compared to the standalone SVR model, the hybridized models demonstrated significant improvement in generalization and predictive abilities. Despite non-significant difference between the performances of the SVR-GWO and SVR-CSA models, the SVR-GWO model demonstrated superior performance. This could be attributed to the GWO's capabilities, which included generating a variety of solutions, demonstrating robustness against noise and outliers, achieving faster convergence speed, and effectively interacting with SVR. This study highlighted that utilizing intelligence hybridized models can significantly enhance the balance between accuracy, robustness, and objectives compared to single models. This finding holds significant implications for ecological engineers tasked with designing and implementing solutions to mitigate the impact of shallow landslides on the environment and human communities. The predictive models developed in this study serve as valuable tools for these engineers, enabling them to identify high-risk areas and implement preventative measures. This interdisciplinary approach, which combines machine learning, optimization algorithms, and ecological engineering, highlights the potential for pioneering solutions in tackling complex environmental challenges, thereby standing as a testament to the power of innovation in driving progress in landslide susceptibility assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility assessment is a complex task due to the multitude of causative factors, spatial variability, data availability, modeling uncertainty, and validation issues. This study addresses these challenges by proposing two predictive models that hybridize support vector regression (SVR) with two evolutionary algorithms: grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and cuckoo search algorithm (CSA). These models were developed using an extensive geospatial database from northern Iran. Over the training phase, the basic predictive model, developed using SVR, was enhanced by incorporating the GWO and CSA algorithms, resulting in the development of two hybridized models: SVR-GWO and SVR-CSA. Over the validation phase, the performance and effectiveness of each hybridized model were compared to the standalone SVR using several metrics. Compared to the standalone SVR model, the hybridized models demonstrated significant improvement in generalization and predictive abilities. Despite non-significant difference between the performances of the SVR-GWO and SVR-CSA models, the SVR-GWO model demonstrated superior performance. This could be attributed to the GWO's capabilities, which included generating a variety of solutions, demonstrating robustness against noise and outliers, achieving faster convergence speed, and effectively interacting with SVR. This study highlighted that utilizing intelligence hybridized models can significantly enhance the balance between accuracy, robustness, and objectives compared to single models. This finding holds significant implications for ecological engineers tasked with designing and implementing solutions to mitigate the impact of shallow landslides on the environment and human communities. The predictive models developed in this study serve as valuable tools for these engineers, enabling them to identify high-risk areas and implement preventative measures. This interdisciplinary approach, which combines machine learning, optimization algorithms, and ecological engineering, highlights the potential for pioneering solutions in tackling complex environmental challenges, thereby standing as a testament to the power of innovation in driving progress in landslide susceptibility assessment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于支持向量回归的新型混合方法评估滑坡易发性
滑坡易发性评估是一项复杂的任务,其原因包括多种致灾因素、空间可变性、数据可用性、建模不确定性和验证问题。为了应对这些挑战,本研究提出了两个预测模型,将支持向量回归(SVR)与两种进化算法(灰狼优化算法(GWO)和布谷鸟搜索算法(CSA))进行了混合。这些模型是利用伊朗北部广泛的地理空间数据库开发的。在训练阶段,使用 SVR 开发的基本预测模型通过加入 GWO 和 CSA 算法得到了增强,最终开发出两个混合模型:SVR-GWO 和 SVR-CSA。在验证阶段,使用多个指标将每个混合模型的性能和有效性与独立的 SVR 进行了比较。与独立的 SVR 模型相比,混合模型在泛化和预测能力方面有显著提高。尽管 SVR-GWO 模型和 SVR-CSA 模型的性能差异不大,但 SVR-GWO 模型的性能更优。这可能要归功于 GWO 的能力,包括生成各种解决方案、对噪声和异常值的鲁棒性、更快的收敛速度以及与 SVR 的有效交互。这项研究强调,与单一模型相比,利用智能混合模型可以显著提高准确性、鲁棒性和目标之间的平衡。这一发现对负责设计和实施解决方案以减轻浅层滑坡对环境和人类社区影响的生态工程师具有重要意义。本研究开发的预测模型是这些工程师的宝贵工具,使他们能够识别高风险区域并实施预防措施。这种将机器学习、优化算法和生态工程相结合的跨学科方法,凸显了在应对复杂环境挑战方面提供开创性解决方案的潜力,从而证明了创新在推动滑坡易发性评估方面所具有的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1