Comparison of different iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement boost technique on the image quality of CT pulmonary angiography for obese patients.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01447-6
Mei Ye, Li Wang, Yan Xing, Yuxiang Li, Zicheng Zhao, Min Xu, Wenya Liu
{"title":"Comparison of different iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement boost technique on the image quality of CT pulmonary angiography for obese patients.","authors":"Mei Ye, Li Wang, Yan Xing, Yuxiang Li, Zicheng Zhao, Min Xu, Wenya Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01447-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of the contrast-enhancement-boost (CE-boost) postprocessing technique on improving the image quality of obese patients in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism. Non-obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) under 25 were designated as group 1, while obese patients (group 2) had a BMI exceeding 25. The CE-boost images were generated by subtracting non-contrast HIR images from contrast-enhanced HIR images to improve the visibility of pulmonary arteries further. The CT value, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively assessed. Two chest radiologists independently reviewed the CT images (5, best; 1, worst) across three subjective characteristics including diagnostic confidence, subjective image noise, and vascular contrast. The Friedman test and Dunn-Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CE-boost had significantly higher CT values than HIR and MBIR in both groups (all p < 0.001). The MBIR yielded the lowest image noise compared with HIR and CE-boost (all p < 0.001). The SNR and CNR of main pulmonary artery (MPA) were significantly higher in CE-boost than in MBIR (all p < 0.05), with HIR showing the lowest values (all p < 0.001). Group 2 MBIR received significantly better subjective image noise scores, while the diagnostic confidence and vascular contrast scored highest with the group 2 CE-boost (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the HIR algorithm, both the CE-boost technique and the MBIR algorithm can improve the image quality of CTPA in obese patients. CE-boost had the greatest potential in increasing the visualization of pulmonary artery and its branches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01447-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the contrast-enhancement-boost (CE-boost) postprocessing technique on improving the image quality of obese patients in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism. Non-obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) under 25 were designated as group 1, while obese patients (group 2) had a BMI exceeding 25. The CE-boost images were generated by subtracting non-contrast HIR images from contrast-enhanced HIR images to improve the visibility of pulmonary arteries further. The CT value, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively assessed. Two chest radiologists independently reviewed the CT images (5, best; 1, worst) across three subjective characteristics including diagnostic confidence, subjective image noise, and vascular contrast. The Friedman test and Dunn-Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The CE-boost had significantly higher CT values than HIR and MBIR in both groups (all p < 0.001). The MBIR yielded the lowest image noise compared with HIR and CE-boost (all p < 0.001). The SNR and CNR of main pulmonary artery (MPA) were significantly higher in CE-boost than in MBIR (all p < 0.05), with HIR showing the lowest values (all p < 0.001). Group 2 MBIR received significantly better subjective image noise scores, while the diagnostic confidence and vascular contrast scored highest with the group 2 CE-boost (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to the HIR algorithm, both the CE-boost technique and the MBIR algorithm can improve the image quality of CTPA in obese patients. CE-boost had the greatest potential in increasing the visualization of pulmonary artery and its branches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同迭代重建算法与造影剂增强技术对肥胖患者 CT 肺血管造影图像质量的比较。
目的与混合迭代重建(HIR)和基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)算法相比,评估对比度增强增强(CE-boost)后处理技术对改善肥胖患者计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)图像质量的影响:这项前瞻性研究的对象是 100 名因疑似肺栓塞而接受 CTPA 检查的患者。体重指数(BMI)低于 25 的非肥胖患者被指定为第 1 组,而体重指数超过 25 的肥胖患者(第 2 组)被指定为第 2 组。CE 增强图像是通过从对比增强 HIR 图像中减去非对比 HIR 图像生成的,以进一步提高肺动脉的可见度。对 CT 值、图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比度-噪声比(CNR)进行了定量评估。两名胸部放射科医生对 CT 图像(5 分,最佳;1 分,最差)的诊断信心、主观图像噪声和血管对比度等三个主观特征进行了独立审查。统计分析采用 Friedman 检验和 Dunn-Bonferroni 校正:在两组中,CE-boost 的 CT 值均明显高于 HIR 和 MBIR(均为 p 结论:CE-boost 的 CT 值明显高于 HIR 和 MBIR:与 HIR 算法相比,CE-boost 技术和 MBIR 算法均可改善肥胖患者 CTPA 的图像质量。CE-boost 在提高肺动脉及其分支的可视化方面潜力最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Dual-stream token fusion with Swin Transformer and lesion-aware tokens for gastric metaplasia classification in IoMT-assisted deployment. Optimizing shielding protocols in tube current modulation chest computed tomography: a phantom study. Very high frequency ultrasonographic characteristics of poroma: a retrospective observational study. Knowledge-guided brain tumor segmentation via synchronized visual-semantic-topological prior fusion. Utility of deep learning for degree calculation of aortic arch calcification in chest-X ray.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1