Increasing or decreasing load during resistance training is not associated with changes in pain among individuals with patellar tendinopathy: a randomized crossover study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2417765
Jesper Lykkegård Toustrup, Kristian Damgaard Lyng, Steffen Strøager Hunniche, Kenneth Mølgaard, Jens Lykkegaard Olesen, Henrik Riel
{"title":"Increasing or decreasing load during resistance training is not associated with changes in pain among individuals with patellar tendinopathy: a randomized crossover study.","authors":"Jesper Lykkegård Toustrup, Kristian Damgaard Lyng, Steffen Strøager Hunniche, Kenneth Mølgaard, Jens Lykkegaard Olesen, Henrik Riel","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2417765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated whether exercising with different relative loads would be associated with different experienced pain intensities in individuals with patellar tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited 14 individuals with patellar tendinopathy for this randomized crossover study. In a randomized order, participants performed one set of single-legged leg presses during one session with three relative loads (6 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, and 14RM). The primary outcome was pain during exercise measured on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), which participants rated after performing the exercise set with each relative load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in pain during either of the three relative loads were observed (F(2, 26) = 0.06, <i>p</i> = 0.942). The participants' experienced pain was 4.5 NRS (SD1.7), 4.5 NRS (SD1.7), and 4.6 NRS (SD2.0) during the 6RM, 10RM, and 14RM loads, respectively. A secondary analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in pain intensity between the performance of the first, second, or third exercise set regardless of the load (F(2, 26) = 1.06, <i>p</i> = 0.367).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in pain intensity during either relative load among individuals with patellar tendinopathy. Therefore, higher loads may be applied, associated with enhanced tendon adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2417765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated whether exercising with different relative loads would be associated with different experienced pain intensities in individuals with patellar tendinopathy.

Materials and methods: We recruited 14 individuals with patellar tendinopathy for this randomized crossover study. In a randomized order, participants performed one set of single-legged leg presses during one session with three relative loads (6 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, and 14RM). The primary outcome was pain during exercise measured on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), which participants rated after performing the exercise set with each relative load.

Results: No differences in pain during either of the three relative loads were observed (F(2, 26) = 0.06, p = 0.942). The participants' experienced pain was 4.5 NRS (SD1.7), 4.5 NRS (SD1.7), and 4.6 NRS (SD2.0) during the 6RM, 10RM, and 14RM loads, respectively. A secondary analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in pain intensity between the performance of the first, second, or third exercise set regardless of the load (F(2, 26) = 1.06, p = 0.367).

Conclusions: There was no difference in pain intensity during either relative load among individuals with patellar tendinopathy. Therefore, higher loads may be applied, associated with enhanced tendon adaptation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阻力训练中增加或减少负荷与髌腱病患者的疼痛变化无关:一项随机交叉研究。
研究目的本研究调查了不同相对负荷的运动是否与髌腱病患者不同的疼痛强度有关:我们招募了 14 名髌骨肌腱病患者参与这项随机交叉研究。按照随机顺序,参与者在一次训练中进行一组单腿压腿训练,并采用三种相对负重(6 次最大负重(RM)、10 次最大负重(RM)和 14 次最大负重(RM))。主要结果是参与者在以每种相对负重完成一组练习后,用 0-10 数字评分量表(NRS)(0 = 无痛,10 = 疼痛最严重)对运动过程中的疼痛进行评分:三种相对负荷下的疼痛感均无差异(F(2, 26) = 0.06, p = 0.942)。在 6RM、10RM 和 14RM 负荷时,参与者的疼痛感分别为 4.5 NRS(SD1.7)、4.5 NRS(SD1.7)和 4.6 NRS(SD2.0)。辅助分析表明,无论负荷大小,在进行第一、第二或第三组练习时,疼痛强度均无明显统计学差异(F(2, 26) = 1.06, p = 0.367):结论:髌骨肌腱病患者在两种相对负荷下的疼痛强度没有差异。因此,施加更大的负荷可能会增强肌腱的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1