Trust, belief and transitions: people's experiences of multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for persistent physical symptoms. A qualitative study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2420833
Hilary Lewis, Helen Jinadu, Rachael Kelley, Nick Medford, Peter Trigwell, Elspeth Guthrie
{"title":"Trust, belief and transitions: people's experiences of multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for persistent physical symptoms. A qualitative study.","authors":"Hilary Lewis, Helen Jinadu, Rachael Kelley, Nick Medford, Peter Trigwell, Elspeth Guthrie","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2420833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People with Persistent Physical Symptoms experience physical symptoms that are not wholly explained by a medical disorder or disease. Multidisciplinary treatment is recommended for people with severe difficulties and is provided in a small number of specialist centres in the UK. Only brief descriptions of this treatment are available, and the experiences of people receiving this treatment as an inpatient have not been explored. This study aimed to explore how people with persistent physical symptoms experience inpatient treatment from a specialist multidisciplinary team, and to identify which factors facilitated their engagement in the rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>18 people who had received inpatient multidisciplinary treatment for persistent physical symptoms participated in semi-structured interviews. The transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' experiences were influenced by whether they felt believed by the healthcare team, and whether they could place their own trust and belief in the staff team and the treatment approach. Their experiences involved a series of transitions; both in environment and understanding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements are possible for people receiving inpatient multidisciplinary treatment for severe PPS. Trusting relationships between patients and staff members take time to develop but play a major role in patients' experiences of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2420833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: People with Persistent Physical Symptoms experience physical symptoms that are not wholly explained by a medical disorder or disease. Multidisciplinary treatment is recommended for people with severe difficulties and is provided in a small number of specialist centres in the UK. Only brief descriptions of this treatment are available, and the experiences of people receiving this treatment as an inpatient have not been explored. This study aimed to explore how people with persistent physical symptoms experience inpatient treatment from a specialist multidisciplinary team, and to identify which factors facilitated their engagement in the rehabilitation.

Materials and methods: 18 people who had received inpatient multidisciplinary treatment for persistent physical symptoms participated in semi-structured interviews. The transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Participants' experiences were influenced by whether they felt believed by the healthcare team, and whether they could place their own trust and belief in the staff team and the treatment approach. Their experiences involved a series of transitions; both in environment and understanding.

Conclusions: Improvements are possible for people receiving inpatient multidisciplinary treatment for severe PPS. Trusting relationships between patients and staff members take time to develop but play a major role in patients' experiences of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任、信念和过渡:人们对持续性身体症状的多学科住院治疗的体验。一项定性研究。
目的:持续性躯体症状患者的躯体症状不能完全用医学紊乱或疾病来解释。建议有严重困难的人接受多学科治疗,英国有少数专科中心提供这种治疗。目前只有关于这种治疗方法的简要介绍,而且还没有对住院病人接受这种治疗的经历进行探讨。本研究旨在探讨有顽固性躯体症状的人如何体验专科多学科团队提供的住院治疗,并确定哪些因素促进了他们参与康复。采用反思性主题分析法对访谈记录进行了分析:参与者的经历受到以下因素的影响:医疗团队是否相信他们,以及他们是否相信医疗团队和治疗方法。他们的经历涉及环境和理解方面的一系列转变:接受住院多学科治疗的重度 PPS 患者的情况有可能得到改善。病人与工作人员之间的信任关系需要时间来建立,但在病人的治疗体验中起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1