Automated breast density assessment for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Shu Jiang, Debbie L Bennett, Simin Chen, Adetunji T Toriola, Graham A Colditz
{"title":"Automated breast density assessment for full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.","authors":"Shu Jiang, Debbie L Bennett, Simin Chen, Adetunji T Toriola, Graham A Colditz","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer (BC) and is reported clinically as part of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) results issued by radiologists. Automated assessment of density is needed that can be used for both full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as both types of exams are acquired in standard clinical practice. We trained a deep learning model to automate the estimation of BI-RADS density from a prospective Washington University (WashU) clinic-based cohort of 9,714 women, entering into the cohort in 2013 with follow-up through, October 31, 2020. The cohort included 27% non-Hispanic Black women. The trained algorithm was assessed in an external validation cohort that included 18,360 women screened at Emory from January 1, 2013 and followed through December 31, 2020 that included 42% non-Hispanic Black women. Our model-estimated BI-RADS density demonstrated substantial agreement with the density as assessed by radiologist. In the external validation, the agreement with radiologists for category B 81% and C 77% for FFDM and B 83% and C 74% for DBT show important distinction for separation of women with dense breast. We obtained a Cohen's κ of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.73) in FFDM and 0.71 (95% CI 0.69, 0.73) in DBT. We provided a consistent and fully automated BI-RADS estimation for both FFDM and DBT using a deep learning model. The software can be easily implemented anywhere for clinical use and risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer (BC) and is reported clinically as part of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) results issued by radiologists. Automated assessment of density is needed that can be used for both full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as both types of exams are acquired in standard clinical practice. We trained a deep learning model to automate the estimation of BI-RADS density from a prospective Washington University (WashU) clinic-based cohort of 9,714 women, entering into the cohort in 2013 with follow-up through, October 31, 2020. The cohort included 27% non-Hispanic Black women. The trained algorithm was assessed in an external validation cohort that included 18,360 women screened at Emory from January 1, 2013 and followed through December 31, 2020 that included 42% non-Hispanic Black women. Our model-estimated BI-RADS density demonstrated substantial agreement with the density as assessed by radiologist. In the external validation, the agreement with radiologists for category B 81% and C 77% for FFDM and B 83% and C 74% for DBT show important distinction for separation of women with dense breast. We obtained a Cohen's κ of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.73) in FFDM and 0.71 (95% CI 0.69, 0.73) in DBT. We provided a consistent and fully automated BI-RADS estimation for both FFDM and DBT using a deep learning model. The software can be easily implemented anywhere for clinical use and risk prediction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全视野数字乳腺 X 射线照相术和数字乳腺断层合成术的自动乳腺密度评估。
乳腺造影密度是乳腺癌(BC)的一个重要危险因素,临床报告是放射科医生发布的乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)结果的一部分。由于全场数字乳腺 X 射线照相术(FFDM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)都是在标准临床实践中获得的检查类型,因此需要能同时用于这两种检查类型的密度自动评估。我们训练了一个深度学习模型,以自动估算华盛顿大学(WashU)诊所前瞻性队列中 9714 名女性的 BI-RADS 密度,该队列于 2013 年加入,随访至 2020 年 10 月 31 日。队列中包括 27% 的非西班牙裔黑人妇女。经过训练的算法在外部验证队列中进行了评估,该队列包括自 2013 年 1 月 1 日起在埃默里接受筛查并随访至 2020 年 12 月 31 日的 18,360 名妇女,其中 42% 为非西班牙裔黑人妇女。我们的模型估计的 BI-RADS 密度与放射科医生评估的密度非常一致。在外部验证中,FFDM 的 B 类 81% 和 C 类 77%,以及 DBT 的 B 类 83% 和 C 类 74% 与放射科医生的一致率显示了在分离致密乳腺女性方面的重要区别。我们在 FFDM 和 DBT 中分别获得了 0.72(95% CI,0.71,0.73)和 0.71(95% CI,0.69,0.73)的 Cohen's κ。我们利用深度学习模型为 FFDM 和 DBT 提供了一致的全自动 BI-RADS 估算。该软件可在任何地方轻松实施,用于临床使用和风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calculating future 10-year breast cancer risks in risk-adapted surveillance: A method comparison and application in clinical practice. Metabolic phenotype and risk of obesity-related cancers in the Women's Health Initiative. What's the Cost: Financial Toxicity and Screening Fatigue in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. Black raspberry modulates cecal and oral microbiome at the early stage of a dibenzo[def,p]chrysene-induced murine oral cancer model. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1