The effects of reference selection methods on PROPELLER MRI

Abstract

PROPELLER MRI has been shown effective for rigid motion compensation, while the performance of existing PROPELLER reconstruction methods critically depend on selecting a proper reference blade.

In this work, we proposed a robust implementation for PROPELLER reconstruction, which was incorporated with different reference selection methods, including single blade reference (SBR), combined blades reference (CBR), grouped blades reference (GBR) and Pipe et al.'s revised method, which requires no blade reference (NBR).

Both simulation and in vivo studies were performed to evaluate the precision and robustness of motion estimation for reference selection methods. In vivo data sets from 10 volunteers with instructed motion and 11 patients with random motion were collected and images were scored independently and blindly by two experienced radiologists.

Both simulation and in vivo studies demonstrate that the four reference selection methods have similar performances according to visual inspection. In our tests, one iteration for the motion estimation can be sufficient for SBR, CBR, or GBR, and comparable to NBR in terms of image quality for clinical diagnosis. With two iterations, SBR, CBR, and GBR are comparable to NBR in terms of motion estimation precision. With our proposed PROPELLER reconstruction, reference selection is not critical for robust motion correction. NBR with no iterations and SBR, CBR, and GBR with two iterations are recommended for accurate motion correction.