Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1038/s41612-024-00834-8
Puja Das, August Posch, Nathan Barber, Michael Hicks, Kate Duffy, Thomas Vandal, Debjani Singh, Katie van Werkhoven, Auroop R. Ganguly
{"title":"Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting","authors":"Puja Das, August Posch, Nathan Barber, Michael Hicks, Kate Duffy, Thomas Vandal, Debjani Singh, Katie van Werkhoven, Auroop R. Ganguly","doi":"10.1038/s41612-024-00834-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precipitation nowcasting, which is critical for flood emergency and river management, has remained challenging for decades, although recent developments in deep generative modeling (DGM) suggest the possibility of improvements. River management centers, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, have been using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for nowcasting, but they have been struggling with missed detections even from best-in-class NWP models. While decades of prior research achieved limited improvements beyond advection and localized evolution, recent attempts have shown progress from so-called physics-free machine learning (ML) methods, and even greater improvements from physics-embedded ML approaches. Developers of DGM for nowcasting have compared their approaches with optical flow (a variant of advection) and meteorologists’ judgment, but not with NWP models. Further, they have not conducted independent co-evaluations with water resources and river managers. Here we show that the state-of-the-art physics-embedded deep generative model, specifically NowcastNet, outperforms the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, which is the latest generation of NWP, along with advection and persistence, especially for heavy precipitation events. Thus, for grid-cell extremes over 16 mm/h, NowcastNet demonstrated a median critical success index (CSI) of 0.30, compared with median CSI of 0.04 for HRRR. However, despite hydrologically-relevant improvements in point-by-point forecasts from NowcastNet, caveats include overestimation of spatially aggregate precipitation over longer lead times. Our co-evaluation with ML developers, hydrologists and river managers suggest the possibility of improved flood emergency response and hydropower management.","PeriodicalId":19438,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00834-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00834-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precipitation nowcasting, which is critical for flood emergency and river management, has remained challenging for decades, although recent developments in deep generative modeling (DGM) suggest the possibility of improvements. River management centers, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, have been using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for nowcasting, but they have been struggling with missed detections even from best-in-class NWP models. While decades of prior research achieved limited improvements beyond advection and localized evolution, recent attempts have shown progress from so-called physics-free machine learning (ML) methods, and even greater improvements from physics-embedded ML approaches. Developers of DGM for nowcasting have compared their approaches with optical flow (a variant of advection) and meteorologists’ judgment, but not with NWP models. Further, they have not conducted independent co-evaluations with water resources and river managers. Here we show that the state-of-the-art physics-embedded deep generative model, specifically NowcastNet, outperforms the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, which is the latest generation of NWP, along with advection and persistence, especially for heavy precipitation events. Thus, for grid-cell extremes over 16 mm/h, NowcastNet demonstrated a median critical success index (CSI) of 0.30, compared with median CSI of 0.04 for HRRR. However, despite hydrologically-relevant improvements in point-by-point forecasts from NowcastNet, caveats include overestimation of spatially aggregate precipitation over longer lead times. Our co-evaluation with ML developers, hydrologists and river managers suggest the possibility of improved flood emergency response and hydropower management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理-人工智能混合技术在极端降水预报方面优于数值天气预报
降水预报对洪水应急和河流管理至关重要,但几十年来,降水预报一直面临挑战,尽管最近在深度生成建模(DGM)方面取得的进展表明,降水预报有可能得到改善。田纳西流域管理局等河流管理中心一直在使用数值天气预报(NWP)模型进行降水预报,但即使是同类最佳的 NWP 模型也会出现漏报现象。虽然之前几十年的研究在平流和局部演变之外取得的改进有限,但最近的尝试表明,所谓的无物理学机器学习(ML)方法取得了进展,而嵌入物理学的 ML 方法则取得了更大的改进。用于预报的 DGM 的开发者将他们的方法与光流(平流的一种变体)和气象学家的判断进行了比较,但没有与 NWP 模型进行比较。此外,他们还没有与水资源和河流管理人员进行独立的共同评估。在这里,我们展示了最先进的物理嵌入式深度生成模型,特别是 NowcastNet,在平流和持续性方面优于高分辨率快速刷新(HRRR)模型,后者是最新一代的 NWP,尤其是在强降水事件中。因此,对于超过 16 毫米/小时的网格单元极端降水,NowcastNet 的关键成功指数 (CSI) 中值为 0.30,而 HRRR 的关键成功指数中值为 0.04。不过,尽管 NowcastNet 的逐点预报在水文相关方面有所改进,但也存在一些问题,包括在较长的准备时间内高估了空间上的降水总量。我们与 ML 开发人员、水文学家和河流管理人员共同进行的评估表明,洪水应急响应和水电管理有可能得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Climate and Atmospheric Science is an open-access journal encompassing the relevant physical, chemical, and biological aspects of atmospheric and climate science. The journal places particular emphasis on regional studies that unveil new insights into specific localities, including examinations of local atmospheric composition, such as aerosols. The range of topics covered by the journal includes climate dynamics, climate variability, weather and climate prediction, climate change, ocean dynamics, weather extremes, air pollution, atmospheric chemistry (including aerosols), the hydrological cycle, and atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land interactions. The journal welcomes studies employing a diverse array of methods, including numerical and statistical modeling, the development and application of in situ observational techniques, remote sensing, and the development or evaluation of new reanalyses.
期刊最新文献
Dominance of open burning signatures in PM2.5 near coal plant should redefine pollutant priorities of India Climate model trend errors are evident in seasonal forecasts at short leads Attributing the recent weakening of the South Asian subtropical westerlies Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting Distinct tropospheric anomalies during sudden stratospheric warming events accompanied by strong and weak Ural Ridge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1