{"title":"Developing the market, developing the fishery? Post-harvest associations in the making of the fish market in Ghana","authors":"Sophie Standen","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Market-led development initiatives are increasingly proposed in development and governance discourse as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. Market-led initiatives are understood as incentivising, but not explicitly directing behaviour change in small-scale fisheries, through the promise of access to higher value-added markets. This paper explores how the creation of fish quality and hygiene standards in the Ghanaian post-harvest fisheries sector is proposed as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. It does so through focusing on the role of Ghanaian post-harvest associations and their relationship to the governance of fish quality and hygiene standards. Ghanaian post-harvest associations are key to the implementation and governance of market-led value addition policies. Drawing from empirical data, as well as critical marketization literature, it argues that the emphasis by development agencies on selling fish to higher value-added, elite markets, can risk furthering inequality, as well as compromising the nutritional importance of low-cost and accessible small pelagic fish for lower-income Ghanaian fish consumers. The focus on value addition in the Ghanaian post-harvest sector, which is portrayed as a livelihood strategy to mitigate revenue loss due to low levels of artisanal fish landings, needs to be questioned. Policies and initiatives which promote value-addition deserve more critical scrutiny in the development of fisheries governance policy in Ghana.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 106536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24005360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Market-led development initiatives are increasingly proposed in development and governance discourse as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. Market-led initiatives are understood as incentivising, but not explicitly directing behaviour change in small-scale fisheries, through the promise of access to higher value-added markets. This paper explores how the creation of fish quality and hygiene standards in the Ghanaian post-harvest fisheries sector is proposed as a means of improving the sustainable governance of fisheries. It does so through focusing on the role of Ghanaian post-harvest associations and their relationship to the governance of fish quality and hygiene standards. Ghanaian post-harvest associations are key to the implementation and governance of market-led value addition policies. Drawing from empirical data, as well as critical marketization literature, it argues that the emphasis by development agencies on selling fish to higher value-added, elite markets, can risk furthering inequality, as well as compromising the nutritional importance of low-cost and accessible small pelagic fish for lower-income Ghanaian fish consumers. The focus on value addition in the Ghanaian post-harvest sector, which is portrayed as a livelihood strategy to mitigate revenue loss due to low levels of artisanal fish landings, needs to be questioned. Policies and initiatives which promote value-addition deserve more critical scrutiny in the development of fisheries governance policy in Ghana.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.