Assessing South Africa’s marine protected area quality and progress towards conservation goals: An application of The MPA Guide framework

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Marine Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106513
Laurel C. Field , Kendyl Wright , Jenna Sullivan-Stack , Jean M. Harris , Stephen P. Kirkman , Peter J. Fielding , Ané Oosthuizen , Siyabonga Dlulisa , Anastasiya Laznya , Emanuel J. Gonçalves , Kirsten Grorud-Colvert
{"title":"Assessing South Africa’s marine protected area quality and progress towards conservation goals: An application of The MPA Guide framework","authors":"Laurel C. Field ,&nbsp;Kendyl Wright ,&nbsp;Jenna Sullivan-Stack ,&nbsp;Jean M. Harris ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Kirkman ,&nbsp;Peter J. Fielding ,&nbsp;Ané Oosthuizen ,&nbsp;Siyabonga Dlulisa ,&nbsp;Anastasiya Laznya ,&nbsp;Emanuel J. Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Kirsten Grorud-Colvert","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a widely used area-based conservation tool for preventing or reversing the loss of marine biodiversity and sustaining the social-ecological systems that it underpins. Global targets for ocean protection typically track the extent of ocean area within MPAs. However, understanding the effectiveness of protection is crucial, as the level of protection and associated benefits for biodiversity and human wellbeing can vary among different types of MPAs. In South Africa, 41 MPAs currently protect 5.4 % of the country’s mainland exclusive economic zone (EEZ), each with varied conservation goals and unique zonation. We evaluated all 41 MPAs using the <em>MPA Guide</em> assessment framework to clarify levels of protection, expected conservation outcomes, and meaningful progress towards meeting national protection targets. We also compared types of site-specific management goals to the assessed level of protection for each MPA to understand whether MPAs are likely to achieve their stated goals. We found that all MPAs are at least Implemented, with most coverage Fully or Highly Protected (70.1 % of total MPA area; 3.8 % of EEZ). We also found that 40 MPAs have levels of protection that are likely to support all types of site-specific management goals. Our results indicate that South Africa’s MPA network has strong potential to deliver positive conservation benefits if MPA funding and capacity constraints, as well as other socio-economic factors, are addressed. Future protection initiatives should consider these factors prior to anticipated MPA expansion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X2400513X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a widely used area-based conservation tool for preventing or reversing the loss of marine biodiversity and sustaining the social-ecological systems that it underpins. Global targets for ocean protection typically track the extent of ocean area within MPAs. However, understanding the effectiveness of protection is crucial, as the level of protection and associated benefits for biodiversity and human wellbeing can vary among different types of MPAs. In South Africa, 41 MPAs currently protect 5.4 % of the country’s mainland exclusive economic zone (EEZ), each with varied conservation goals and unique zonation. We evaluated all 41 MPAs using the MPA Guide assessment framework to clarify levels of protection, expected conservation outcomes, and meaningful progress towards meeting national protection targets. We also compared types of site-specific management goals to the assessed level of protection for each MPA to understand whether MPAs are likely to achieve their stated goals. We found that all MPAs are at least Implemented, with most coverage Fully or Highly Protected (70.1 % of total MPA area; 3.8 % of EEZ). We also found that 40 MPAs have levels of protection that are likely to support all types of site-specific management goals. Our results indicate that South Africa’s MPA network has strong potential to deliver positive conservation benefits if MPA funding and capacity constraints, as well as other socio-economic factors, are addressed. Future protection initiatives should consider these factors prior to anticipated MPA expansion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估南非海洋保护区的质量和实现保护目标的进展:MPA指南框架的应用
海洋保护区(MPAs)是一种广泛使用的基于区域的保护工具,用于防止或扭转海洋生物多样性的丧失,并维持其所支撑的社会生态系统。全球海洋保护目标通常跟踪海洋保护区内海洋面积的范围。然而,了解保护的有效性是至关重要的,因为不同类型的海洋保护区的保护水平及其对生物多样性和人类福祉的相关效益可能各不相同。在南非,41个海洋保护区目前保护着该国大陆5.4% %的专属经济区(EEZ),每个保护区都有不同的保护目标和独特的分区。我们使用MPA指南评估框架对所有41个海洋保护区进行了评估,以明确保护水平、预期保护结果以及实现国家保护目标的有意义进展。我们还将特定地点的管理目标类型与每个海洋保护区的评估保护水平进行了比较,以了解海洋保护区是否有可能实现其既定目标。我们发现,所有的海洋保护区都至少得到了实施,大多数覆盖范围是完全或高度保护(占海洋保护区总面积的70.1 %;占专属经济区的3.8% %)。我们还发现,40个海洋保护区的保护水平可能支持所有类型的特定地点管理目标。我们的研究结果表明,如果解决了MPA的资金和能力限制以及其他社会经济因素,南非的MPA网络具有强大的潜力,可以提供积极的保护效益。未来的保护计划应该在预期的海洋保护区扩张之前考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
期刊最新文献
The tale of being financially excluded – An ethnographic study of fishing community in the western coastline of India The use of remote sensing to detect illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) tuna fishing activities in the Peruvian Exclusive Economic Zone The place and role of economic language and economic appraisal in environmental decision-making: Lessons from the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in France Empowering micro and small fishermen: The role of livelihood capital in achieving environmental sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1