Personalized use of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Translational Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1038/s41398-024-03180-8
Gustavo C Medeiros, Isabella Demo, Fernando S Goes, Carlos A Zarate, Todd D Gould
{"title":"Personalized use of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression.","authors":"Gustavo C Medeiros, Isabella Demo, Fernando S Goes, Carlos A Zarate, Todd D Gould","doi":"10.1038/s41398-024-03180-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large and disproportionate portion of the burden associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) is due to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and intranasal (S)-ketamine (esketamine) are rapid-acting antidepressants that can effectively treat TRD. However, there is variability in response to ketamine/esketamine, and a personalized approach to their use will increase success rates in the treatment of TRD. There is a growing literature on the precision use of ketamine in TRD, and the body of evidence on esketamine is still relatively small. The identification of reliable predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine that are easily translatable to clinical practice is urgently needed. Potential clinical predictors of a robust response to ketamine include a pre-treatment positive family history of alcohol use disorder and a pre-treatment positive history of clinically significant childhood trauma. Pre-treatment versus post-treatment increases in gamma power in frontoparietal brain regions, observed in electroencephalogram (EEG) studies, is a promising brain-based biomarker of response to ketamine, given its time of onset and general applicability. Blood-based biomarkers have shown limited usefulness, with small-effect increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) being the most consistent indicator of ketamine response. The severity of treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms is typically not associated with a response either to ketamine or esketamine. Future studies should ensure that biomarkers and clinical variables are obtained in a similar manner across studies to allow appropriate comparison across trials and to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Most predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine have modest effect sizes; therefore, the use of multivariate predictive models will be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"14 1","pages":"481"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03180-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large and disproportionate portion of the burden associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) is due to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and intranasal (S)-ketamine (esketamine) are rapid-acting antidepressants that can effectively treat TRD. However, there is variability in response to ketamine/esketamine, and a personalized approach to their use will increase success rates in the treatment of TRD. There is a growing literature on the precision use of ketamine in TRD, and the body of evidence on esketamine is still relatively small. The identification of reliable predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine that are easily translatable to clinical practice is urgently needed. Potential clinical predictors of a robust response to ketamine include a pre-treatment positive family history of alcohol use disorder and a pre-treatment positive history of clinically significant childhood trauma. Pre-treatment versus post-treatment increases in gamma power in frontoparietal brain regions, observed in electroencephalogram (EEG) studies, is a promising brain-based biomarker of response to ketamine, given its time of onset and general applicability. Blood-based biomarkers have shown limited usefulness, with small-effect increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) being the most consistent indicator of ketamine response. The severity of treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms is typically not associated with a response either to ketamine or esketamine. Future studies should ensure that biomarkers and clinical variables are obtained in a similar manner across studies to allow appropriate comparison across trials and to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Most predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine have modest effect sizes; therefore, the use of multivariate predictive models will be needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体化使用氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症。
在与重度抑郁症(MDD)相关的负担中,很大一部分不成比例的负担是由难治性抑郁症(TRD)造成的。静脉(R,S)-氯胺酮(氯胺酮)和鼻(S)-氯胺酮(艾氯胺酮)是速效抗抑郁药,可有效治疗TRD。然而,对氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮的反应存在差异,对其使用的个性化方法将提高治疗TRD的成功率。关于在TRD中精确使用氯胺酮的文献越来越多,而关于艾氯胺酮的证据仍然相对较少。迫切需要确定氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮反应的可靠预测因子,并易于转化为临床实践。对氯胺酮反应强烈的潜在临床预测因素包括治疗前阳性的酒精使用障碍家族史和治疗前阳性的临床显著的儿童创伤史。在脑电图(EEG)研究中观察到治疗前与治疗后脑额顶叶区域伽马功率的增加,鉴于其起效时间和普遍适用性,这是一种有希望的基于脑的氯胺酮反应生物标志物。基于血液的生物标志物显示出有限的用处,脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的小效应增加是氯胺酮反应的最一致的指标。治疗中出现的解离症状的严重程度通常与氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮的反应无关。未来的研究应确保在研究中以相似的方式获得生物标志物和临床变量,以便在试验之间进行适当的比较,并降低信噪比。大多数对氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮反应的预测因子具有适度的效应量;因此,需要使用多变量预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Distinct neural substrates of obsessions and compulsions in adolescent obsessive compulsive disorder. Role of neural oscillations in depression: highlights on gamma oscillations. Integrated clinical and postmortem profiling in schizophrenia reveals a cognitive subtype linked to cerebrovascular disease. sCMOS-based fNIRS system: validation via optical performance and cortical response. Astrocyte-related proteins mediate the association of YWHAG with Alzheimer's pathology and enhance its diagnostic value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1