Evaluating paternalism in redress programs

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1111/polp.12635

Stephen Winter, Martin Wilkinson

{"title":"Evaluating paternalism in redress programs","authors":"Stephen Winter, Martin Wilkinson","doi":"10.1111/polp.12635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The number of monetary redress programs for survivors of nonrecent abuse in out-of-home care is growing. These programs help make monetary remedies more accessible to survivors. However, the reasons that justify these programs also encourage policy makers to adopt paternalistic measures. This article argues that most paternalistic restrictions are unjustified because they infringe on survivors' autonomy without clearly benefiting them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Kahn-Nisser, Sara. 2018. “Constructive Criticism: Shaming, Incentives, and Human Rights Reforms.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 46(1): 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12240.</p>\n \n <p>Winter, Stephen. 2020. “Tools for Tragedy: Procedures for Assessing Historic Redress Claims.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 49(1): 162–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12385.</p>\n \n <p>Woessner, Matthew, and April Kelly-Woessner. 2006. “Slavery Reparations and Race Relations in America: Assessing How the Restitutions Debate Influences Public Support for Blacks, Civil Rights, and Affirmative Action.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 34(1): 134–54. 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00007.x.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 6","pages":"1399-1416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12635","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of monetary redress programs for survivors of nonrecent abuse in out-of-home care is growing. These programs help make monetary remedies more accessible to survivors. However, the reasons that justify these programs also encourage policy makers to adopt paternalistic measures. This article argues that most paternalistic restrictions are unjustified because they infringe on survivors' autonomy without clearly benefiting them.

Kahn-Nisser, Sara. 2018. “Constructive Criticism: Shaming, Incentives, and Human Rights Reforms.” Politics & Policy 46(1): 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12240.

Winter, Stephen. 2020. “Tools for Tragedy: Procedures for Assessing Historic Redress Claims.” Politics & Policy 49(1): 162–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12385.

Woessner, Matthew, and April Kelly-Woessner. 2006. “Slavery Reparations and Race Relations in America: Assessing How the Restitutions Debate Influences Public Support for Blacks, Civil Rights, and Affirmative Action.” Politics & Policy 34(1): 134–54. 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00007.x.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

评估矫正计划中的家长作风

为在家庭外照料中遭受非近期虐待的幸存者提供金钱补偿的项目越来越多。这些项目帮助幸存者更容易获得金钱救济。然而，为这些计划辩护的理由也鼓励决策者采取家长式的措施。本文认为，大多数家长式的限制是不合理的，因为它们侵犯了幸存者的自主权，却没有明显地给他们带来好处。康尼瑟，萨拉。2018。建设性批评：羞辱、激励和人权改革。政治,政策46(1):58-83。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12240。冬天，斯蒂芬，2020。“悲剧的工具：评估历史赔偿要求的程序”政治,政策49(1):162-85。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12385。沃斯纳，马修和艾普丽尔·凯利-沃斯纳。2006. “美国的奴隶制赔偿和种族关系：评估赔偿辩论如何影响公众对黑人、民权和平权行动的支持。”政治,政策34(1):134-54。10.1111 / j.1747-1346.2006.00007.x。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

23.10%

发文量