Comparison and analysis of deep learning models for discriminating longitudinal and oblique vaginal septa based on ultrasound imaging.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01507-x
Xiangyu Wang, Liang Wang, Xin Hou, Jingfang Li, Jin Li, Xiangyi Ma
{"title":"Comparison and analysis of deep learning models for discriminating longitudinal and oblique vaginal septa based on ultrasound imaging.","authors":"Xiangyu Wang, Liang Wang, Xin Hou, Jingfang Li, Jin Li, Xiangyi Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01507-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum are female müllerian duct anomalies that are relatively less diagnosed but severely fertility-threatening in clinical practice. Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to examine the two vaginal malformations, but in fact it's difficult to make an accurate differential diagnosis. This study is intended to assess the performance of multiple deep learning models based on ultrasonographic images for distinguishing longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cases and ultrasound images of longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum were collected. Two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models (ResNet50 and ConvNeXt-B) and one base resolution variant of vision transformer (ViT)-based neural network (ViT-B/16) were selected to construct ultrasonographic classification models. The receiver operating curve analysis and four indicators including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 cases with 426 ultrasound images were included for deep learning models construction using 5-fold cross-validation. Convolutional neural network-based models (ResNet50 and ConvNeXt-B) presented significantly better case-level discriminative efficacy with accuracy of 0.842 (variance, 0.004, 95%CI, [0.639-0.997]) and 0.897 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.734-1.000]), specificity of 0.709 (variance, 0.041, [95%CI, 0.505-0.905]) and 0.811 (variance, 0.017, [95%CI, 0.622-0.979]), and AUC of 0.842 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.639-0.997]) and 0.897 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.734-1.000]) than transformer-based model (ViT-B/16) with its accuracy of 0.668 (variance, 0.014, [95%CI, 0.407-0.920]), specificity of 0.572 (variance, 0.024, [95%CI, 0.304-0.831]) and AUC of 0.681 (variance, 0.030, [95%CI, 0.434-0.908]). There was no significance of AUC between ConvNeXt-B and ResNet50 (P = 0.841).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Convolutional neural network-based model (ConvNeXt-B) shows promising capability of discriminating longitudinal and oblique vaginal septa ultrasound images and is expected to be introduced to clinical ultrasonographic diagnostic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01507-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum are female müllerian duct anomalies that are relatively less diagnosed but severely fertility-threatening in clinical practice. Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to examine the two vaginal malformations, but in fact it's difficult to make an accurate differential diagnosis. This study is intended to assess the performance of multiple deep learning models based on ultrasonographic images for distinguishing longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum.

Methods: The cases and ultrasound images of longitudinal vaginal septum and oblique vaginal septum were collected. Two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models (ResNet50 and ConvNeXt-B) and one base resolution variant of vision transformer (ViT)-based neural network (ViT-B/16) were selected to construct ultrasonographic classification models. The receiver operating curve analysis and four indicators including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of deep learning models.

Results: A total of 70 cases with 426 ultrasound images were included for deep learning models construction using 5-fold cross-validation. Convolutional neural network-based models (ResNet50 and ConvNeXt-B) presented significantly better case-level discriminative efficacy with accuracy of 0.842 (variance, 0.004, 95%CI, [0.639-0.997]) and 0.897 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.734-1.000]), specificity of 0.709 (variance, 0.041, [95%CI, 0.505-0.905]) and 0.811 (variance, 0.017, [95%CI, 0.622-0.979]), and AUC of 0.842 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.639-0.997]) and 0.897 (variance, 0.004, [95%CI, 0.734-1.000]) than transformer-based model (ViT-B/16) with its accuracy of 0.668 (variance, 0.014, [95%CI, 0.407-0.920]), specificity of 0.572 (variance, 0.024, [95%CI, 0.304-0.831]) and AUC of 0.681 (variance, 0.030, [95%CI, 0.434-0.908]). There was no significance of AUC between ConvNeXt-B and ResNet50 (P = 0.841).

Conclusions: Convolutional neural network-based model (ConvNeXt-B) shows promising capability of discriminating longitudinal and oblique vaginal septa ultrasound images and is expected to be introduced to clinical ultrasonographic diagnostic system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于超声图像的阴道纵、斜隔深度学习识别模型的比较与分析。
背景:阴道纵向间隔和阴道斜间隔是女性勒氏管异常,诊断相对较少,但在临床中严重威胁生育。超声成像通常用于检查这两种阴道畸形,但实际上很难做出准确的鉴别诊断。本研究旨在评估基于超声图像的多种深度学习模型在区分阴道纵向间隔和斜向间隔方面的性能。方法:收集阴道纵隔和斜隔的病例和超声图像。选择两个基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的模型(ResNet50和ConvNeXt-B)和一个基于视觉变压器(ViT)的基本分辨率变体(ViT- b /16)构建超声图像分类模型。采用受试者工作曲线分析和准确率、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC) 4个指标比较深度学习模型的诊断性能。结果:共纳入70例426张超声图像,采用5重交叉验证构建深度学习模型。基于卷积神经网络的模型(ResNet50和ConvNeXt-B)具有较好的病例水平判别效果,准确率分别为0.842(方差,0.004,95%CI,[0.639-0.997])和0.897(方差,0.004,95%CI,[0.734-1.000]),特异性分别为0.709(方差,0.041,[95%CI, 0.505-0.905])和0.811(方差,0.017,[95%CI, 0.622-0.979]), AUC分别为0.842(方差,0.004,[95%CI, 0.639-0.997])和0.897(方差,0.004,[95%CI, 0.639-0.997])。(0.734 ~ 1.000),准确度为0.668(方差为0.014,[95%CI, 0.407 ~ 0.920]),特异性为0.572(方差为0.024,[95%CI, 0.304 ~ 0.831]), AUC为0.681(方差为0.030,[95%CI, 0.434 ~ 0.908])。ConvNeXt-B与ResNet50的AUC差异无统计学意义(P = 0.841)。结论:基于卷积神经网络的模型(ConvNeXt-B)对阴道纵隔和斜隔超声图像的鉴别能力较好,有望应用于临床超声诊断系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) imaging with conventional MR imaging for the diagnosis of traumatic fractures in children. Application of CT-based radiomics combined with laboratory tests such as AFP and PIVKA-II in preoperative prediction of pathologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning. Correction: Distinct circle of willis anatomical configurations in healthy preterm born adults: a 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography study. Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1