Tip‐to‐base bark cross‐sectional areas contribute to understanding the drivers of carbon allocation to bark and the functional roles of bark tissues

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/nph.20379
Karen Vázquez‐Segovia, Mark E. Olson, Julio Campo, Guillermo Ángeles, Cristina Martínez‐Garza, Susanne Vetter, Julieta A. Rosell
{"title":"Tip‐to‐base bark cross‐sectional areas contribute to understanding the drivers of carbon allocation to bark and the functional roles of bark tissues","authors":"Karen Vázquez‐Segovia, Mark E. Olson, Julio Campo, Guillermo Ángeles, Cristina Martínez‐Garza, Susanne Vetter, Julieta A. Rosell","doi":"10.1111/nph.20379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Along their lengths, stems experience different functional demands. Because bark and wood traits are usually studied at single points on stems, it remains unclear how carbon allocation changes along tip‐to‐base trajectories across species.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We examined bark vs wood allocation by measuring cross‐sectional areas of outer and inner bark (OB and IB), IB regions (secondary phloem, cortex, and phelloderm), and wood from stem tips to bases of 35 woody angiosperm species of diverse phylogenetic lineages, climates, fire regimes, and bark morphologies. We examined how varied bark vs wood allocation was and how it was affected by precipitation, temperature, soil fertility, leaf habit, and fire regime.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Allocation to phloem (relative to wood) varied little across species, whereas allocation to other tissues, strongly affected by the environment or shed in ontogeny, varied widely. Allocation to parenchyma‐rich cortex and phloem was higher at drier sites, suggesting storage. Higher allocation to phloem and cortex also occurred on infertile soils, and to phloem in drought‐deciduous vs cold‐deciduous and evergreen species. Allocation to OB was highest at sites with frequent fires and decreased with fire frequency.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our approach contextualizes inferences from across‐species studies, allows testing functional hypotheses, and contributes to disentangling the functional roles of poorly understood bark tissues.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Along their lengths, stems experience different functional demands. Because bark and wood traits are usually studied at single points on stems, it remains unclear how carbon allocation changes along tip‐to‐base trajectories across species. We examined bark vs wood allocation by measuring cross‐sectional areas of outer and inner bark (OB and IB), IB regions (secondary phloem, cortex, and phelloderm), and wood from stem tips to bases of 35 woody angiosperm species of diverse phylogenetic lineages, climates, fire regimes, and bark morphologies. We examined how varied bark vs wood allocation was and how it was affected by precipitation, temperature, soil fertility, leaf habit, and fire regime. Allocation to phloem (relative to wood) varied little across species, whereas allocation to other tissues, strongly affected by the environment or shed in ontogeny, varied widely. Allocation to parenchyma‐rich cortex and phloem was higher at drier sites, suggesting storage. Higher allocation to phloem and cortex also occurred on infertile soils, and to phloem in drought‐deciduous vs cold‐deciduous and evergreen species. Allocation to OB was highest at sites with frequent fires and decreased with fire frequency. Our approach contextualizes inferences from across‐species studies, allows testing functional hypotheses, and contributes to disentangling the functional roles of poorly understood bark tissues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Flexible or fortified? How lichens balance defence strategies across climatic harshness gradients A test of the Grant–Stebbins pollinator‐shift model of floral evolution Elevated CO2 alters soybean physiology and defense responses, and has disparate effects on susceptibility to diverse microbial pathogens The evolutionary history evident in grass pollen morphology Tip‐to‐base bark cross‐sectional areas contribute to understanding the drivers of carbon allocation to bark and the functional roles of bark tissues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1