Matthew Moir, Hannah Butler, Craig Peter, Tony Dold, Ethan Newman
{"title":"A test of the Grant–Stebbins pollinator‐shift model of floral evolution","authors":"Matthew Moir, Hannah Butler, Craig Peter, Tony Dold, Ethan Newman","doi":"10.1111/nph.20373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Pollinators are thought to play a key role in driving incipient speciation within the angiosperms. However, the mechanisms underlying floral divergence in plants with generalist pollination systems, remains understudied.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Brunsvigia gregaria</jats:italic> displays significant geographical variation in floral traits and are visited by diverse pollinator communities. Because pollinators are often shared between populations, we investigated whether specific pollinators are responsible for driving floral divergence between them.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Three distinct ecotypes were identified, each dominated by three different pollinators: bees, swallowtail butterflies, and long‐proboscid flies. Across seven populations, we found a pattern of association between style length and the morphology of pollinators that visit the flowers most frequently and contact the reproductive parts most often. Furthermore, we found significant linear, quadratic and correlational selection on flower number, tepal length and style length within the butterfly‐ and bee‐dominated populations. We also found partial evidence for divergent selection on these traits between experimental sites.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our findings suggest that a handful of key pollinators that vary in their importance have the potential to drive population‐level divergence in floral traits, which may lead to pollination ecotype formation.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SummaryPollinators are thought to play a key role in driving incipient speciation within the angiosperms. However, the mechanisms underlying floral divergence in plants with generalist pollination systems, remains understudied.Brunsvigia gregaria displays significant geographical variation in floral traits and are visited by diverse pollinator communities. Because pollinators are often shared between populations, we investigated whether specific pollinators are responsible for driving floral divergence between them.Three distinct ecotypes were identified, each dominated by three different pollinators: bees, swallowtail butterflies, and long‐proboscid flies. Across seven populations, we found a pattern of association between style length and the morphology of pollinators that visit the flowers most frequently and contact the reproductive parts most often. Furthermore, we found significant linear, quadratic and correlational selection on flower number, tepal length and style length within the butterfly‐ and bee‐dominated populations. We also found partial evidence for divergent selection on these traits between experimental sites.Our findings suggest that a handful of key pollinators that vary in their importance have the potential to drive population‐level divergence in floral traits, which may lead to pollination ecotype formation.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.