The Tokyo Metropolitan Government external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for clinics in 2023.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Japanese journal of infectious diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.7883/yoken.JJID.2024.205
Rie Moriuchi, Ryouta Inaba, Miyuki Nagano, Mayuko Oda, Takayuki Shinkai, Toshihisa Noguchi, Yoshiyuki Sugishita, Itaru Nishizuka, Yoshikazu Ishii
{"title":"The Tokyo Metropolitan Government external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for clinics in 2023.","authors":"Rie Moriuchi, Ryouta Inaba, Miyuki Nagano, Mayuko Oda, Takayuki Shinkai, Toshihisa Noguchi, Yoshiyuki Sugishita, Itaru Nishizuka, Yoshikazu Ishii","doi":"10.7883/yoken.JJID.2024.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An external quality assessment (EQA) on nucleic acid amplification tests for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted among clinics that introduced testing instrument through the Tokyo Subsidy Program for Facilities and Equipment for Testing in COVID-19 in 2023. The survey samples consisted of sample 1 (20,000 copies/mL), sample 2 (10,000 copies/mL), and negative sample. Results were obtained through Cycle threshold (Ct) values as well as positive-negative result determinations. On-site technical support was provided to the clinics that responded incorrectly. A total of 544 clinics (589 instruments) participated, and Abbott's ID NOW <sup>TM</sup> (82.2%) was the most widely used in this survey. The qualitative test results showed high correctness rates, 95.2% for sample 1, 93.2% for sample 2, and 96.3% for negative sample. Differences in Ct values were observed among reagents and instruments. Technical support were provided to 63 clinics. It revealed that discrepancies of qualitative test were mainly due to deviations from the protocol instructions, mixing all three survey samples into one vial and errors caused by foaming. This survey was unique in that the participants were mostly end-users who were not laboratory testing specialists and mainly used point-of-care testing instruments. It is important to continue EQA to improve and maintain testing accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14608,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2024.205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An external quality assessment (EQA) on nucleic acid amplification tests for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted among clinics that introduced testing instrument through the Tokyo Subsidy Program for Facilities and Equipment for Testing in COVID-19 in 2023. The survey samples consisted of sample 1 (20,000 copies/mL), sample 2 (10,000 copies/mL), and negative sample. Results were obtained through Cycle threshold (Ct) values as well as positive-negative result determinations. On-site technical support was provided to the clinics that responded incorrectly. A total of 544 clinics (589 instruments) participated, and Abbott's ID NOW TM (82.2%) was the most widely used in this survey. The qualitative test results showed high correctness rates, 95.2% for sample 1, 93.2% for sample 2, and 96.3% for negative sample. Differences in Ct values were observed among reagents and instruments. Technical support were provided to 63 clinics. It revealed that discrepancies of qualitative test were mainly due to deviations from the protocol instructions, mixing all three survey samples into one vial and errors caused by foaming. This survey was unique in that the participants were mostly end-users who were not laboratory testing specialists and mainly used point-of-care testing instruments. It is important to continue EQA to improve and maintain testing accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases (JJID), an official bimonthly publication of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, publishes papers dealing with basic research on infectious diseases relevant to humans in the fields of bacteriology, virology, mycology, parasitology, medical entomology, vaccinology, and toxinology. Pathology, immunology, biochemistry, and blood safety related to microbial pathogens are among the fields covered. Sections include: original papers, short communications, epidemiological reports, methods, laboratory and epidemiology communications, letters to the editor, and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of rapid amplicon-based nanopore sequencing using the latest chemistry for accurate whole genome analysis of influenza A virus in clinical samples. Monkeypox outbreak 2023 in Chengdu, China: an observational study. Detection of recombinant type of human adenovirus C composed of type 89 and type 5 in Aichi Prefecture, Japan, 2016-2019. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for clinics in 2023. Seroprevalence of hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus antibodies in Madhesh Province, Dhanusha, Nepal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1