Artificial intelligence for the detection of acute myeloid leukemia from microscopic blood images; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2024.1402926
Feras Al-Obeidat, Wael Hafez, Asrar Rashid, Mahir Khalil Jallo, Munier Gador, Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Daniel Simancas-Racines
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for the detection of acute myeloid leukemia from microscopic blood images; a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Feras Al-Obeidat, Wael Hafez, Asrar Rashid, Mahir Khalil Jallo, Munier Gador, Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Daniel Simancas-Racines","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2024.1402926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leukemia is the 11<sup>th</sup> most prevalent type of cancer worldwide, with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) being the most frequent malignant blood malignancy in adults. Microscopic blood tests are the most common methods for identifying leukemia subtypes. An automated optical image-processing system using artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been applied to facilitate clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the performance of all AI-based approaches for the detection and diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until December 2023. We used the \"metafor\" and \"metagen\" libraries in R to analyze the different models used in the studies. Accuracy and sensitivity were the primary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included in our review and meta-analysis, conducted between 2016 and 2023. Most deep-learning models have been utilized, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The common- and random-effects models had accuracies of 1.0000 [0.9999; 1.0001] and 0.9557 [0.9312, and 0.9802], respectively. The common and random effects models had high sensitivity values of 1.0000 and 0.8581, respectively, indicating that the machine learning models in this study can accurately detect true-positive leukemia cases. Studies have shown substantial variations in accuracy and sensitivity, as shown by the Q values and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis found an overall high accuracy and sensitivity of AI models in correctly identifying true-positive AML cases. Future research should focus on unifying reporting methods and performance assessment metrics of AI-based diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, CRD42024501980.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"7 ","pages":"1402926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1402926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leukemia is the 11th most prevalent type of cancer worldwide, with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) being the most frequent malignant blood malignancy in adults. Microscopic blood tests are the most common methods for identifying leukemia subtypes. An automated optical image-processing system using artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been applied to facilitate clinical decision-making.

Aim: To evaluate the performance of all AI-based approaches for the detection and diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Methods: Medical databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until December 2023. We used the "metafor" and "metagen" libraries in R to analyze the different models used in the studies. Accuracy and sensitivity were the primary outcome measures.

Results: Ten studies were included in our review and meta-analysis, conducted between 2016 and 2023. Most deep-learning models have been utilized, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The common- and random-effects models had accuracies of 1.0000 [0.9999; 1.0001] and 0.9557 [0.9312, and 0.9802], respectively. The common and random effects models had high sensitivity values of 1.0000 and 0.8581, respectively, indicating that the machine learning models in this study can accurately detect true-positive leukemia cases. Studies have shown substantial variations in accuracy and sensitivity, as shown by the Q values and I2 statistics.

Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis found an overall high accuracy and sensitivity of AI models in correctly identifying true-positive AML cases. Future research should focus on unifying reporting methods and performance assessment metrics of AI-based diagnostics.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, CRD42024501980.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scalable tool for analyzing genomic variants of humans using knowledge graphs and graph machine learning. Artificial intelligence for the detection of acute myeloid leukemia from microscopic blood images; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Toward a physics-guided machine learning approach for predicting chaotic systems dynamics. Analysis and prediction of atmospheric ozone concentrations using machine learning. Prediction model of middle school student performance based on MBSO and MDBO-BP-Adaboost method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1