Analytical modeling of simultaneous phase transitions in a low-temperature evaporator for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle using R134a: A comparative study with water coolant

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109685
Sandeep Aryal, Kwangkook Jeong
{"title":"Analytical modeling of simultaneous phase transitions in a low-temperature evaporator for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle using R134a: A comparative study with water coolant","authors":"Sandeep Aryal,&nbsp;Kwangkook Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on comparing the heat and water recovery performance of two coolants, R134a refrigerant and water, in a low-temperature evaporator (LT-E) designed for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The primary objectives were to develop a one-dimensional analytical model capable of predicting simultaneous phase transitions—internal flow boiling of R134a and condensation of water vapor from flue gas on the outer tube wall—and to compare the heat and mass transfer performance of R134a with that of water. Baseline modeling conditions included a flue gas temperature of 57.3 °C, coolant inlet temperature of 16 °C, and a coolant mass velocity of 126.4 kg/sm<sup>2</sup>, with inlet pressures of 630 kPa for R134a and 100 kPa for water. The model’s predictions showed average discrepancies of 10 % for water recovery efficiency and 3 % for flue gas exit temperature when compared to experimental data. Case studies revealed that R134a outperformed water in heat flux by 16 % to 67 %, and water recovery efficiency was 15 % to 68 % higher with R134a. Increased heat exchanger surface area improved recovery efficiency for both coolants, eventually reaching an asymptotic limit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 109685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X24004107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on comparing the heat and water recovery performance of two coolants, R134a refrigerant and water, in a low-temperature evaporator (LT-E) designed for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The primary objectives were to develop a one-dimensional analytical model capable of predicting simultaneous phase transitions—internal flow boiling of R134a and condensation of water vapor from flue gas on the outer tube wall—and to compare the heat and mass transfer performance of R134a with that of water. Baseline modeling conditions included a flue gas temperature of 57.3 °C, coolant inlet temperature of 16 °C, and a coolant mass velocity of 126.4 kg/sm2, with inlet pressures of 630 kPa for R134a and 100 kPa for water. The model’s predictions showed average discrepancies of 10 % for water recovery efficiency and 3 % for flue gas exit temperature when compared to experimental data. Case studies revealed that R134a outperformed water in heat flux by 16 % to 67 %, and water recovery efficiency was 15 % to 68 % higher with R134a. Increased heat exchanger surface area improved recovery efficiency for both coolants, eventually reaching an asymptotic limit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of convective heat transfer and fluid dynamics relevant to engineering or the environment, including multiphase and microscale flows. Papers reporting the application of these disciplines to design and development, with emphasis on new technological fields, are also welcomed. Some of these new fields include microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.
期刊最新文献
Viscosity-driven clustering of heated polydispersed particles in subsonic jet flows Control of flow separation from an axisymmetric body using tangentially steady bowing jets Theoretical and numerical studies of heat and humidity transfer in underground ventilation corridor Quasi-one-dimensional mathematical model of the two-dimensional supersonic cavity mean flow Numerical simulation of fractional order double diffusive convective nanofluid flow in a wavy porous enclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1