Analytical modeling of simultaneous phase transitions in a low-temperature evaporator for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle using R134a: A comparative study with water coolant

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109685
Sandeep Aryal, Kwangkook Jeong
{"title":"Analytical modeling of simultaneous phase transitions in a low-temperature evaporator for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle using R134a: A comparative study with water coolant","authors":"Sandeep Aryal,&nbsp;Kwangkook Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on comparing the heat and water recovery performance of two coolants, R134a refrigerant and water, in a low-temperature evaporator (LT-E) designed for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The primary objectives were to develop a one-dimensional analytical model capable of predicting simultaneous phase transitions—internal flow boiling of R134a and condensation of water vapor from flue gas on the outer tube wall—and to compare the heat and mass transfer performance of R134a with that of water. Baseline modeling conditions included a flue gas temperature of 57.3 °C, coolant inlet temperature of 16 °C, and a coolant mass velocity of 126.4 kg/sm<sup>2</sup>, with inlet pressures of 630 kPa for R134a and 100 kPa for water. The model’s predictions showed average discrepancies of 10 % for water recovery efficiency and 3 % for flue gas exit temperature when compared to experimental data. Case studies revealed that R134a outperformed water in heat flux by 16 % to 67 %, and water recovery efficiency was 15 % to 68 % higher with R134a. Increased heat exchanger surface area improved recovery efficiency for both coolants, eventually reaching an asymptotic limit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 109685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X24004107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on comparing the heat and water recovery performance of two coolants, R134a refrigerant and water, in a low-temperature evaporator (LT-E) designed for a pilot-scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The primary objectives were to develop a one-dimensional analytical model capable of predicting simultaneous phase transitions—internal flow boiling of R134a and condensation of water vapor from flue gas on the outer tube wall—and to compare the heat and mass transfer performance of R134a with that of water. Baseline modeling conditions included a flue gas temperature of 57.3 °C, coolant inlet temperature of 16 °C, and a coolant mass velocity of 126.4 kg/sm2, with inlet pressures of 630 kPa for R134a and 100 kPa for water. The model’s predictions showed average discrepancies of 10 % for water recovery efficiency and 3 % for flue gas exit temperature when compared to experimental data. Case studies revealed that R134a outperformed water in heat flux by 16 % to 67 %, and water recovery efficiency was 15 % to 68 % higher with R134a. Increased heat exchanger surface area improved recovery efficiency for both coolants, eventually reaching an asymptotic limit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R134a有机朗肯循环中试低温蒸发器同步相变的分析建模:与水冷却剂的比较研究
本研究的重点是比较两种冷却剂R134a制冷剂和水在中试有机朗肯循环(ORC)低温蒸发器(LT-E)中的热回收和水回收性能。主要目标是建立一个能够预测同时相变的一维分析模型- R134a的内部流动沸腾和烟气中的水蒸气在外管壁上的冷凝-并比较R134a与水的传热传质性能。基线建模条件包括烟道气温度为57.3℃,冷却剂入口温度为16℃,冷却剂质量速度为126.4 kg/sm2, R134a的入口压力为630 kPa,水为100 kPa。该模型的预测表明,与实验数据相比,水回收效率的平均差异为10%,烟气出口温度的平均差异为3%。案例研究表明,R134a的热流密度比水高16% ~ 67%,水的回收效率比R134a高15% ~ 68%。增加热交换器表面积提高了两种冷却剂的回收效率,最终达到渐近极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of convective heat transfer and fluid dynamics relevant to engineering or the environment, including multiphase and microscale flows. Papers reporting the application of these disciplines to design and development, with emphasis on new technological fields, are also welcomed. Some of these new fields include microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.
期刊最新文献
CFD analysis of single and two-phase fluid flow in a Roots blower Large eddy simulation of metered dose inhaler sprays with low-GWP propellants Flow dynamics in the micro-sized channel and chamfer formation mechanism during abrasive flow machining Numerical analysis of multiple influences on turbine vane endwall film cooling characteristics Study of influence of design criteria with integrated PCM on performance of skeletal heat exchanger: based on enthalpy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1