Development of an efficient computerized adaptive test measuring children’s self-care performance

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104929
Cheng-Te Chen , Kuan-Lin Chen , Chien-Yu Huang
{"title":"Development of an efficient computerized adaptive test measuring children’s self-care performance","authors":"Cheng-Te Chen ,&nbsp;Kuan-Lin Chen ,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Computerized Adaptive Test for Measuring Children’s Self-care Performance (CAT-SC) was developed with an interview administration approach for a limited population.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We developed a new CAT-SC (the CAT-SC-T) based on the original candidate item bank of the CAT-SC, using the caregiver-report approach and targeting children with and without disability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures design</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study in the general community, 1289 caregivers of children with and without disability were assessed with the original candidate item bank of the CAT-SC.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>The item bank of the CAT-SC-T contained 69 items with unidimensionality. The three stopping rules were (1) administering a minimum of 10 items and a maximum of 16 items, (2) observing the first 10 items receiving the lowest scores, and (3) ensuring a reliability of self-care performance estimate of 0.95. From the simulation analyses, only 10–16 items were needed for each assessment to achieve good reliability and validity. The person reliability for most children (83.9 %) exceeded 0.95. Of the 16.1 % not meeting the 0.95 reliability criterion, 19 % (n = 39) were extreme responders. The good concurrent validity of the CAT-SC-T was proven by its very high correlation coefficient (<em>r</em> = 0.99) between the scores using the entire item bank and the estimated scores of the CAT-SC-T. Significant score differences between children with and without disability indicated good discriminant validity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>The CAT-SC-T appears to be an efficient, reliable, and valid assessment of children’s self-care performance. The CAT-SC-T can be applied to children with and without disability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225000137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Computerized Adaptive Test for Measuring Children’s Self-care Performance (CAT-SC) was developed with an interview administration approach for a limited population.

Aims

We developed a new CAT-SC (the CAT-SC-T) based on the original candidate item bank of the CAT-SC, using the caregiver-report approach and targeting children with and without disability.

Methods and procedures design

In this cross-sectional study in the general community, 1289 caregivers of children with and without disability were assessed with the original candidate item bank of the CAT-SC.

Outcomes and results

The item bank of the CAT-SC-T contained 69 items with unidimensionality. The three stopping rules were (1) administering a minimum of 10 items and a maximum of 16 items, (2) observing the first 10 items receiving the lowest scores, and (3) ensuring a reliability of self-care performance estimate of 0.95. From the simulation analyses, only 10–16 items were needed for each assessment to achieve good reliability and validity. The person reliability for most children (83.9 %) exceeded 0.95. Of the 16.1 % not meeting the 0.95 reliability criterion, 19 % (n = 39) were extreme responders. The good concurrent validity of the CAT-SC-T was proven by its very high correlation coefficient (r = 0.99) between the scores using the entire item bank and the estimated scores of the CAT-SC-T. Significant score differences between children with and without disability indicated good discriminant validity.

Conclusions and implications

The CAT-SC-T appears to be an efficient, reliable, and valid assessment of children’s self-care performance. The CAT-SC-T can be applied to children with and without disability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Measures of emotional well-being for individuals with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review of reviews Underlying neurophysiological and biomechanical mechanisms related to postural control of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder differ from those in typically developing children Health-related quality of life and participation in adolescents: The role of ADHD, and co-occurrence of DCD Development of an efficient computerized adaptive test measuring children’s self-care performance Development of fluid intelligence in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1