Comprehensive assessment of energy, exergy, and environmental impacts of lemongrass oil-diesel blend with dimethyl and diethyl ethers in agricultural diesel engines

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2025.110187
Sathiyamoorthi Ramalingam , Senthil Sampath , Thiruselvam Krishnamoorthi , Murugapoopathi Saravanamuthu , Damodharan Dillikannan
{"title":"Comprehensive assessment of energy, exergy, and environmental impacts of lemongrass oil-diesel blend with dimethyl and diethyl ethers in agricultural diesel engines","authors":"Sathiyamoorthi Ramalingam ,&nbsp;Senthil Sampath ,&nbsp;Thiruselvam Krishnamoorthi ,&nbsp;Murugapoopathi Saravanamuthu ,&nbsp;Damodharan Dillikannan","doi":"10.1016/j.cep.2025.110187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study investigated the emission and performance characteristics along with fuel availability (exergy) and Energy of diesel, Lemongrass oil with dimethyl ether (DME) and diethyl ether (DEE) additives at volumetric ratios of 2.5 % and 5 % at different loads. The analysis is focused on shaft, cooling water, and exhaust availability. It was found that peak loads increase input availability. Peak load conditions maximized the gross work production because of fuel exergy in the combustion chamber. DEE 5 % with LGO25 had exergy efficiencies that were 69.54 % higher than diesel at 80 % load and entropy of 70.32 % lower entropy than diesel fuel 80 % load. The DEE and DME blend showed poor engine performance compared to diesel fuel as they produced higher cylinder pressure and temperature. It depicts that the LGO25 + DME 5 % fuel blend produced 33.3 % less Carbon monoxide, 6.1 % less Hydrocarbon and 28.01 % less smoke emission with respect to LGO25. The LGO25+DEE5 blends produced 11.25 % less Carbon monoxide emission, 21.05 % less Hydrocarbon emission along with 31.4 % less smoke emission against the LGO25 fueling operation. Moreover, Nitrogen Oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) emissions were increased by 7.82 % and 26.89 % at LGO25 with DME5 % and LGO25+DEE5 % blends respectively when compared with LGO25 fueling mode.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9929,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 110187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270125000376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated the emission and performance characteristics along with fuel availability (exergy) and Energy of diesel, Lemongrass oil with dimethyl ether (DME) and diethyl ether (DEE) additives at volumetric ratios of 2.5 % and 5 % at different loads. The analysis is focused on shaft, cooling water, and exhaust availability. It was found that peak loads increase input availability. Peak load conditions maximized the gross work production because of fuel exergy in the combustion chamber. DEE 5 % with LGO25 had exergy efficiencies that were 69.54 % higher than diesel at 80 % load and entropy of 70.32 % lower entropy than diesel fuel 80 % load. The DEE and DME blend showed poor engine performance compared to diesel fuel as they produced higher cylinder pressure and temperature. It depicts that the LGO25 + DME 5 % fuel blend produced 33.3 % less Carbon monoxide, 6.1 % less Hydrocarbon and 28.01 % less smoke emission with respect to LGO25. The LGO25+DEE5 blends produced 11.25 % less Carbon monoxide emission, 21.05 % less Hydrocarbon emission along with 31.4 % less smoke emission against the LGO25 fueling operation. Moreover, Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions were increased by 7.82 % and 26.89 % at LGO25 with DME5 % and LGO25+DEE5 % blends respectively when compared with LGO25 fueling mode.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业柴油发动机中柠檬草油-柴油混合物与二甲醚和二乙醚的能源、能源和环境影响的综合评估
本研究考察了香茅油在添加二甲醚(DME)和乙醚(DEE)的体积比为2.5%和5%的情况下,在不同负荷下的排放和性能特征,以及燃料利用率(exergy)和能量。分析的重点是轴、冷却水和排气的可用性。研究发现,峰值负荷增加了输入的可用性。由于燃烧室中的燃料燃烧,峰值负荷条件使总功产量最大化。5%含LGO25的DEE在80%负荷下的火用效率比柴油高69.54%,熵比柴油低70.32%。与柴油相比,DEE和DME混合燃料的发动机性能较差,因为它们产生更高的气缸压力和温度。结果表明,与LGO25相比,LGO25 + DME 5%的燃料混合物产生的一氧化碳减少33.3%,碳氢化合物减少6.1%,烟雾排放量减少28.01%。与LGO25加油相比,LGO25+DEE5混合物的一氧化碳排放量减少11.25%,碳氢化合物排放量减少21.05%,烟雾排放量减少31.4%。此外,与LGO25加油模式相比,LGO25与dme5%和LGO25+ dee5%混合燃料的氮氧化物(NOx)排放量分别增加了7.82%和26.89%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
408
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification is intended for practicing researchers in industry and academia, working in the field of Process Engineering and related to the subject of Process Intensification.Articles published in the Journal demonstrate how novel discoveries, developments and theories in the field of Process Engineering and in particular Process Intensification may be used for analysis and design of innovative equipment and processing methods with substantially improved sustainability, efficiency and environmental performance.
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of a PV/T-powered membrane distillation system for industrial cooling tower blowdown water treatment Modeling and experimental study of the mass transfer performance in a pilot-scale mixer-settler with organic phase recirculation Development of MoS2/TiO2 coated graphite felt as the positive electrode for vanadium redox flow battery Precipitation of salicylic acid with and without US-assistance. Study on supersaturation discharge, conversion, and yield Socio-economic assessment of energetic alternatives for Amazon isolated communities in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1