Determining the effects of social media engagement on surgery residents within the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0213
Vincent S Alexander, Bebe Eke, Andrew Xu, Ryan Wong, Andrew Greek, Michael Ernst, Hayden Roberts, Ogechukwu Ariwodo, Andrew D Vogel, Bracken Burns, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz
{"title":"Determining the effects of social media engagement on surgery residents within the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons.","authors":"Vincent S Alexander, Bebe Eke, Andrew Xu, Ryan Wong, Andrew Greek, Michael Ernst, Hayden Roberts, Ogechukwu Ariwodo, Andrew D Vogel, Bracken Burns, Kristen Conrad-Schnetz","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The widespread adoption of social media has transformed how individuals connect in medicine. This study explores how social media can be utilized as a conduit to connect osteopathic medical students and residents. By examining how these digital connections can support professional development, this study investigates social media's role as a potential foundation for a mentorship program, fostering guidance, support, and career insights for osteopathic medical students within the surgical field.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of \"X\" (formerly Twitter) in networking between osteopathic medical students and surgical residents, specifically assessing engagement rates and the potential of social media as a tool for mentorship in the osteopathic surgical community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved surgical programs that the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS) represents were identified online. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) residents were identified retrospectively through an online search of publicly available data. Residents and programs were searched through X, and account handles were collected. Residents were contacted through X by direct messaging and subsequently directly commented in the initial ACOS Medical Student Section (ACOS-MSS) message. Descriptive statistics along with the chi-square and Fisher's exact statistical tests were utilized for demographic and categorical variable analysis, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are 1179 DO surgical residents in ACGME programs, with 84.8 % of those being General Surgery residents. Among residents, 75 % of Cardiothoracic (CT) Surgery, 46.4 % of Urology, 28.6 % of Neurosurgery, 17.3 % of General Surgery, and 11.11 % of Plastic Surgery residents have X accounts. Specific surgical subspecialties are more likely to have an X account in comparison to General Surgery, including CT Surgery (odds ratio [OR], 11.13; p=0.02), Urology (OR, 4.13; p<0.0001), and Neurosurgery (OR, 0.842; p=0.047). After multiple attempts, 0 % of Plastic Surgery, 2.9 % of General Surgery, 7.8 % of Urology, 18.8 % of Neurosurgery, and 33.3 % of CT Surgery residents signed up for the mentorship program, totaling 13 residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals low social media engagement via X among osteopathic surgical residents, with notable variation across surgical specialties. This limited engagement suggests exploring and refining social media strategies that foster mentorship connections within the osteopathic surgical community. Future studies should examine other social media platforms and alternative engagement approaches to enhance the reach and impact of mentorship initiatives, ultimately supporting osteopathic medical students as they navigate career paths in surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The widespread adoption of social media has transformed how individuals connect in medicine. This study explores how social media can be utilized as a conduit to connect osteopathic medical students and residents. By examining how these digital connections can support professional development, this study investigates social media's role as a potential foundation for a mentorship program, fostering guidance, support, and career insights for osteopathic medical students within the surgical field.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of "X" (formerly Twitter) in networking between osteopathic medical students and surgical residents, specifically assessing engagement rates and the potential of social media as a tool for mentorship in the osteopathic surgical community.

Methods: The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved surgical programs that the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS) represents were identified online. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) residents were identified retrospectively through an online search of publicly available data. Residents and programs were searched through X, and account handles were collected. Residents were contacted through X by direct messaging and subsequently directly commented in the initial ACOS Medical Student Section (ACOS-MSS) message. Descriptive statistics along with the chi-square and Fisher's exact statistical tests were utilized for demographic and categorical variable analysis, respectively.

Results: There are 1179 DO surgical residents in ACGME programs, with 84.8 % of those being General Surgery residents. Among residents, 75 % of Cardiothoracic (CT) Surgery, 46.4 % of Urology, 28.6 % of Neurosurgery, 17.3 % of General Surgery, and 11.11 % of Plastic Surgery residents have X accounts. Specific surgical subspecialties are more likely to have an X account in comparison to General Surgery, including CT Surgery (odds ratio [OR], 11.13; p=0.02), Urology (OR, 4.13; p<0.0001), and Neurosurgery (OR, 0.842; p=0.047). After multiple attempts, 0 % of Plastic Surgery, 2.9 % of General Surgery, 7.8 % of Urology, 18.8 % of Neurosurgery, and 33.3 % of CT Surgery residents signed up for the mentorship program, totaling 13 residents.

Conclusions: The study reveals low social media engagement via X among osteopathic surgical residents, with notable variation across surgical specialties. This limited engagement suggests exploring and refining social media strategies that foster mentorship connections within the osteopathic surgical community. Future studies should examine other social media platforms and alternative engagement approaches to enhance the reach and impact of mentorship initiatives, ultimately supporting osteopathic medical students as they navigate career paths in surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Pioneering the future: incorporating lifestyle medicine tools in osteopathic medical education. Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study. The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on chronic rhinosinusitis. Trends in osteopathic medical education: a scoping review. Determining the effects of social media engagement on surgery residents within the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1