Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0167
Lilian Zhan, Juanita Brown, Sharon Gustowski, Patrick Davis, Mario Loomis
{"title":"Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study.","authors":"Lilian Zhan, Juanita Brown, Sharon Gustowski, Patrick Davis, Mario Loomis","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. When mild to moderate in severity, nonoperative treatments including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have been found to be effective. Studies have been carried out to quantify the mechanism of such treatments with cadaver studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot project investigated the mechanism of a previously undescribed technique of nonoperative carpal tunnel treatment, dorsal carpal arch muscle energy (DCA-ME), which focuses on the dorsal arch (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate bones) manipulating the bones to redome the arch, round the tunnel, and increase its volume. Although the actual effectiveness of such manipulation in the treatment of CTS can only be assessed and quantified in patients with the disorder, this initial study was carried out to see if it was feasible for physical changes following DCA-ME to be quantified with ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot study of 25 healthy volunteers with no prior history of CTS or related disorders was undertaken to quantify anatomical changes in carpal tunnel dimensions following OMT of the nondominant wrist, utilizing DCA-ME. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the OMT group (n=14) or the control group (n=11). The control group underwent a sham manipulation. Pre- and postultrasound measurements of carpal tunnel dimensions were made. The study employed a two-group, pre-/postmanipulation design to evaluate the anatomical changes resulting from the OMT manipulation compared to those following the control sham manipulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the OMT and control groups revealed a mean increase in carpal tunnel depth from 0.45 mm ± 0.13 mm pre-OMT to 0.48 mm ± 0.13 mm post-OMT (p=0.0146, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 to 0.0517). There was also a mean increase in cross-sectional area from 1.83 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.56 mm<sup>2</sup> pre-OMT to 1.98 mm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.59 mm<sup>2</sup> post-OMT (p=0.0058, Cohen's <i>d</i>=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517 to 0.2490). There was no significant difference in canal width (p=0.5973) or transverse carpal ligament length (p=0.2673) following OMT intervention. The control group, which received the sham procedure, demonstrated no significant differences in the transverse carpal ligament length, carpal tunnel width, depth, or cross-sectional area before and after the sham intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound measurements at the narrowest section of the carpal tunnel before and after DCA-ME OMT of healthy asymptomatic wrists demonstrated a significant increase in cross-sectional area as well as depth, with no significant change in the length of the transverse carpal ligament, suggesting that the cause of the increased volume is an alteration of dorsal arch shape. A limitation of the study is the small sample size, inclusion of only healthy wrists, the short period of time between manipulation and measurements, and the difficulty of assuring the same level and angle of ultrasound measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. When mild to moderate in severity, nonoperative treatments including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have been found to be effective. Studies have been carried out to quantify the mechanism of such treatments with cadaver studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound.

Objectives: This pilot project investigated the mechanism of a previously undescribed technique of nonoperative carpal tunnel treatment, dorsal carpal arch muscle energy (DCA-ME), which focuses on the dorsal arch (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate bones) manipulating the bones to redome the arch, round the tunnel, and increase its volume. Although the actual effectiveness of such manipulation in the treatment of CTS can only be assessed and quantified in patients with the disorder, this initial study was carried out to see if it was feasible for physical changes following DCA-ME to be quantified with ultrasound.

Methods: A pilot study of 25 healthy volunteers with no prior history of CTS or related disorders was undertaken to quantify anatomical changes in carpal tunnel dimensions following OMT of the nondominant wrist, utilizing DCA-ME. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the OMT group (n=14) or the control group (n=11). The control group underwent a sham manipulation. Pre- and postultrasound measurements of carpal tunnel dimensions were made. The study employed a two-group, pre-/postmanipulation design to evaluate the anatomical changes resulting from the OMT manipulation compared to those following the control sham manipulation.

Results: Comparison of the OMT and control groups revealed a mean increase in carpal tunnel depth from 0.45 mm ± 0.13 mm pre-OMT to 0.48 mm ± 0.13 mm post-OMT (p=0.0146, Cohen's d=0.214, 95 % CI 0.0068 to 0.0517). There was also a mean increase in cross-sectional area from 1.83 mm2 ± 0.56 mm2 pre-OMT to 1.98 mm2 ± 0.59 mm2 post-OMT (p=0.0058, Cohen's d=0.260, 95 % CI 0.0517 to 0.2490). There was no significant difference in canal width (p=0.5973) or transverse carpal ligament length (p=0.2673) following OMT intervention. The control group, which received the sham procedure, demonstrated no significant differences in the transverse carpal ligament length, carpal tunnel width, depth, or cross-sectional area before and after the sham intervention.

Conclusions: Ultrasound measurements at the narrowest section of the carpal tunnel before and after DCA-ME OMT of healthy asymptomatic wrists demonstrated a significant increase in cross-sectional area as well as depth, with no significant change in the length of the transverse carpal ligament, suggesting that the cause of the increased volume is an alteration of dorsal arch shape. A limitation of the study is the small sample size, inclusion of only healthy wrists, the short period of time between manipulation and measurements, and the difficulty of assuring the same level and angle of ultrasound measurements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Pioneering the future: incorporating lifestyle medicine tools in osteopathic medical education. Carpal tunnel dimensions following osteopathic manipulation utilizing dorsal carpal arch muscle energy: a pilot study. The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on chronic rhinosinusitis. Trends in osteopathic medical education: a scoping review. Determining the effects of social media engagement on surgery residents within the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1