The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on chronic rhinosinusitis.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0122
Marija Rowane, Ashwin Shankar, Supriya Nagireddi, Amanpreet Kalkat, Cheryl Hammes, Eshika Kohli, Meghan Callahan, Robert Hostoffer
{"title":"The effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on chronic rhinosinusitis.","authors":"Marija Rowane, Ashwin Shankar, Supriya Nagireddi, Amanpreet Kalkat, Cheryl Hammes, Eshika Kohli, Meghan Callahan, Robert Hostoffer","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that may significantly impair quality of life. CRS may also benefit from the application of manual techniques through osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), which aims to improve venous and lymphatic circulation, sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow, and cervicothoracic somatic dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether OMT focused on lymphatic drainage of cranial structures can provide immediate, as well as sustained, relief of CRS symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-blinded study (WCG IRB study number: 1359444) was conducted at an allergy/immunology practice. Study participants included 43 adult patients, with a diagnosis of CRS, refractory to conventional medical therapy, with prior exposure to OMT. Patients consented to the study and were assigned by the provider to the OMT group or the control group 50/50. A four-question, 5-point Likert scale survey inquiring about the severity of nasal congestion, postnasal drainage, and facial or sinus pain/pressure, as well as the appreciation of the opportunity for an alternative therapy, was administered prior to the intervention. An OMT sequence was applied by the same osteopathic physician to each OMT group participant in the following order: thoracicinlet release, venous sinus drainage, occipital-atlantal decompression, thoracic paraspinal inhibition, facial sinus pressure, and Galbreath technique. A structural examination involving light touch was applied to the control group participants. The same 5-point Likert scale survey was administered immediately after the intervention. Participants were provided a blank copy of the survey to save and complete 10 days after the intervention. A paired <i>t</i>-test was applied for statistical comparison between the pre- and postsurveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 patients, including 22 patients in the treatment group (51.1 %) and 21 (48.8 %) patients in the control group, consented to and participated in the study, from May 1 to 30, 2024. Study demographics included 76.7 % females (n=33), 23.3 % males (n=10), 97.7 % White (n=42), and they patients had an average age of 54.4 years. Surveys administered before and immediately after the intervention were completed by 100 % of the study participants. All three surveys, including the presurvey and postsurvey completed immediately after and 10 days after the intervention, were completed by 60.5 % of the study participants. The OMT group pre-vs. immediate postsurvey results scored a statistically significant decrease in the severity of nasal congestion (p=0.001), postnasal drainage (p=0.002), and facial or sinus pain or pressure (p=0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our single-blinded, prospective survey findings suggested that there was a benefit of OMT application for the immediate relief of CRS symptoms, predominantly in alleviating the severity of sinus pain or pressure. This study is the first large study (n=43) with a control group that shows that OMT techniques improve immediate CRS symptom relief of nasal congestion, postnasal drainage, and facial or sinus pain/pressure when compared to the pretreatment survey. Our study also demonstrated that the symptomatic relief by OMT of rhinosinusitis was not sustained in 10 days. OMT offers a safe, nonpharmacological complementary therapy to relieve lymphatic congestion and improve mucociliary clearance in CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"299-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that may significantly impair quality of life. CRS may also benefit from the application of manual techniques through osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), which aims to improve venous and lymphatic circulation, sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow, and cervicothoracic somatic dysfunction.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess whether OMT focused on lymphatic drainage of cranial structures can provide immediate, as well as sustained, relief of CRS symptoms.

Methods: This prospective, single-blinded study (WCG IRB study number: 1359444) was conducted at an allergy/immunology practice. Study participants included 43 adult patients, with a diagnosis of CRS, refractory to conventional medical therapy, with prior exposure to OMT. Patients consented to the study and were assigned by the provider to the OMT group or the control group 50/50. A four-question, 5-point Likert scale survey inquiring about the severity of nasal congestion, postnasal drainage, and facial or sinus pain/pressure, as well as the appreciation of the opportunity for an alternative therapy, was administered prior to the intervention. An OMT sequence was applied by the same osteopathic physician to each OMT group participant in the following order: thoracicinlet release, venous sinus drainage, occipital-atlantal decompression, thoracic paraspinal inhibition, facial sinus pressure, and Galbreath technique. A structural examination involving light touch was applied to the control group participants. The same 5-point Likert scale survey was administered immediately after the intervention. Participants were provided a blank copy of the survey to save and complete 10 days after the intervention. A paired t-test was applied for statistical comparison between the pre- and postsurveys.

Results: A total of 43 patients, including 22 patients in the treatment group (51.1 %) and 21 (48.8 %) patients in the control group, consented to and participated in the study, from May 1 to 30, 2024. Study demographics included 76.7 % females (n=33), 23.3 % males (n=10), 97.7 % White (n=42), and they patients had an average age of 54.4 years. Surveys administered before and immediately after the intervention were completed by 100 % of the study participants. All three surveys, including the presurvey and postsurvey completed immediately after and 10 days after the intervention, were completed by 60.5 % of the study participants. The OMT group pre-vs. immediate postsurvey results scored a statistically significant decrease in the severity of nasal congestion (p=0.001), postnasal drainage (p=0.002), and facial or sinus pain or pressure (p=0.0004).

Conclusions: Our single-blinded, prospective survey findings suggested that there was a benefit of OMT application for the immediate relief of CRS symptoms, predominantly in alleviating the severity of sinus pain or pressure. This study is the first large study (n=43) with a control group that shows that OMT techniques improve immediate CRS symptom relief of nasal congestion, postnasal drainage, and facial or sinus pain/pressure when compared to the pretreatment survey. Our study also demonstrated that the symptomatic relief by OMT of rhinosinusitis was not sustained in 10 days. OMT offers a safe, nonpharmacological complementary therapy to relieve lymphatic congestion and improve mucociliary clearance in CRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整骨疗法对慢性鼻炎的影响。
背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种常见的鼻窦炎症性疾病,可显著影响生活质量。CRS也可能受益于通过骨科手法治疗(OMT)的手工技术的应用,旨在改善静脉和淋巴循环,交感和副交感神经流出,以及颈胸躯体功能障碍。目的:本研究旨在评估以颅结构淋巴引流为重点的OMT是否能立即、持续地缓解CRS症状。方法:这项前瞻性单盲研究(WCG IRB研究编号:1359444)在过敏/免疫学实践中进行。研究参与者包括43名成年患者,诊断为CRS,常规药物治疗难治性,既往接触过OMT。患者同意这项研究,并由提供者按50/50的比例分配到OMT组或对照组。在干预之前,进行了一项4题5分李克特量表调查,询问鼻塞、鼻后引流、面部或鼻窦疼痛/压力的严重程度,以及对替代治疗机会的欣赏。由同一位骨科医生对每位OMT组参与者按以下顺序应用OMT序列:胸入口释放,静脉窦引流,枕- atlon减压,胸椎管旁抑制,面部窦压力和Galbreath技术。对对照组的参与者进行了一项涉及轻触的结构检查。干预后立即进行同样的5分李克特量表调查。参与者在干预后10天保存并完成一份空白的调查问卷。调查前后采用配对t检验进行统计比较。结果:2024年5月1日至30日,共有43例患者同意并参与研究,其中治疗组22例(51.1 %),对照组21例(48.8 %)。研究人口统计学包括76.7% %女性(n=33), 23.3% %男性(n=10), 97.7% %白人(n=42),患者平均年龄54.4岁。在干预之前和之后立即进行的调查由100% %的研究参与者完成。所有三项调查,包括干预后立即和干预后10天完成的调查和后调查,均由60.5% %的研究参与者完成。之前的OMT组。调查后的即时结果显示,鼻塞(p=0.001)、鼻后引流(p=0.002)、面部或鼻窦疼痛或压力(p=0.0004)的严重程度有统计学意义的显著降低。结论:我们的单盲、前瞻性调查结果表明,应用OMT可立即缓解CRS症状,主要是减轻鼻窦疼痛或压力的严重程度。本研究是第一个大型研究(n=43),有一个对照组,表明与预处理调查相比,OMT技术改善了鼻塞、鼻后引流和面部或鼻窦疼痛/压力的即时CRS症状缓解。我们的研究还表明,OMT治疗鼻窦炎的症状缓解不能持续10天。OMT提供了一种安全的、非药物的补充治疗,以缓解CRS的淋巴充血和改善粘膜纤毛清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Allopathic resident prevalence in orthopedic residency programs formerly accredited by the American Osteopathic Association during single accreditation. Investigating biomarkers associated with mortality in patients receiving VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review. Effect of COMLEX-USA Level 1 pass/fail score reporting on student stress, test preparation, and performance. Associations of comorbidities, opioid use, and intimate partner violence, with urinary tract infections in pregnancy: implications for prevention and screening. Analysis of hepatitis B immunity in vaccinated medical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1