Who views what from whom? Social media exposure and the Chinese public's risk perceptions of climate change.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1111/risa.17716
Jiayu Huang, Yumei Bu
{"title":"Who views what from whom? Social media exposure and the Chinese public's risk perceptions of climate change.","authors":"Jiayu Huang, Yumei Bu","doi":"10.1111/risa.17716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Chinese public is increasingly experiencing the local impacts of climate change, whereas the government downplays its domestic effects and critical opinions on environmental governance. As climate change perceptions are crucial for individual risk management, adaptation, and collective climate actions, it is vital to explore how these perceptions are shaped. Given the increasing significance of social media in climate change discourse, this study employs survey data from the 2021 Environmental Risk Perceptions and Environmental Behaviors of Urban Residents Project to investigate how social media exposure influences risk perceptions of climate change among the Chinese public. Drawing on the social amplification of risk framework, this study examines the effect of exposure to environmental information, exposure to opinion diversity, individuals' social media network ties to environmental opinion leaders, and the interaction between social media exposure and cultural values. The results indicate that in the contexts where climate change is neither politically divisive nor openly debated, social media exposure to diverse opinions and social media network ties to environmental scholars positively predict risk perceptions. Additionally, egalitarianism and fatalism are found to moderate the effect of these connections with environmental scholars. This study extends previous research, which focuses largely on the association between the frequency of social media exposure and risk perceptions of climate change, by revealing a more comprehensive and nuanced process that links social media exposure to climate change perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"4231-4245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Chinese public is increasingly experiencing the local impacts of climate change, whereas the government downplays its domestic effects and critical opinions on environmental governance. As climate change perceptions are crucial for individual risk management, adaptation, and collective climate actions, it is vital to explore how these perceptions are shaped. Given the increasing significance of social media in climate change discourse, this study employs survey data from the 2021 Environmental Risk Perceptions and Environmental Behaviors of Urban Residents Project to investigate how social media exposure influences risk perceptions of climate change among the Chinese public. Drawing on the social amplification of risk framework, this study examines the effect of exposure to environmental information, exposure to opinion diversity, individuals' social media network ties to environmental opinion leaders, and the interaction between social media exposure and cultural values. The results indicate that in the contexts where climate change is neither politically divisive nor openly debated, social media exposure to diverse opinions and social media network ties to environmental scholars positively predict risk perceptions. Additionally, egalitarianism and fatalism are found to moderate the effect of these connections with environmental scholars. This study extends previous research, which focuses largely on the association between the frequency of social media exposure and risk perceptions of climate change, by revealing a more comprehensive and nuanced process that links social media exposure to climate change perceptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁从谁那里看什么?社交媒体曝光与中国公众对气候变化的风险认知。
中国公众越来越多地感受到气候变化对当地的影响,而政府却淡化了气候变化对国内的影响,并对环境治理提出了批评意见。由于气候变化观念对个人风险管理、适应和集体气候行动至关重要,因此探索这些观念是如何形成的至关重要。鉴于社交媒体在气候变化话语中的重要性日益增加,本研究采用2021年城市居民环境风险感知和环境行为项目的调查数据,调查社交媒体曝光如何影响中国公众对气候变化的风险感知。利用风险的社会放大框架,本研究考察了环境信息暴露、意见多样性暴露、个人与环境意见领袖的社交媒体网络联系以及社交媒体暴露与文化价值观之间的相互作用。结果表明,在气候变化既没有政治分歧也没有公开辩论的背景下,社交媒体上的不同观点以及与环境学者的社交媒体网络联系积极地预测了风险感知。此外,平均主义和宿命论被发现缓和了这些与环境学者的联系的影响。这项研究扩展了之前的研究,主要关注社交媒体曝光频率与气候变化风险感知之间的关系,揭示了一个更全面、更细致的过程,将社交媒体曝光与气候变化感知联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Organizational Collaborative Governance in Extreme Disaster Risk: Adaptive Mechanisms and Configuration Pathways of Emerging Technologies. An Optimal Local Connectivity-Based Rasterization Method to Support Transport Accessibility and Resilience Analysis. A Broadly Applicable Warning Response Index: Cross-Hazard Validation for Enhanced Early Warning Communication. Hydrogen-Induced Risks to the Natural Gas Industry Chain: A Two-Layer Network Approach. Michael Greenberg: Master Synthesizer of Risk, Public Health, and Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1