Grazing optimizes forage production and soil GHG emissions of mixed perennial pasture in an inland arid area

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109788
Jiao Ning , Yarong Guo , Shanning Lou , Cheng Zhang , Wanhe Zhu , Charles P. West , Xiong Z. He , Fujiang Hou
{"title":"Grazing optimizes forage production and soil GHG emissions of mixed perennial pasture in an inland arid area","authors":"Jiao Ning ,&nbsp;Yarong Guo ,&nbsp;Shanning Lou ,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wanhe Zhu ,&nbsp;Charles P. West ,&nbsp;Xiong Z. He ,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>In the context of global warming and increasing demands for forage production, optimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and forage production is crucial to sustainable pasture management in arid areas.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>A 4-year experiment was conducted to compare the impacts of grazing versus haying on GHG emissions and forage yields in a mixed perennial pasture of alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa</em>) and tall fescue (<em>Lolium arundinaceum</em>) on a saline cropland.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Static box method was used to measure the monthly dynamics of soil CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. We measured the forage dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) yields, and soil properties, and calculated the GHG intensity (GHGI) to assess the balance between forage yields and GHG emissions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found that grazing reduced total GHG emissions by 17.2 % compared to haying in the second year; however, the reduction was later offset by nutrient enrichment from livestock manure. Grazing produced 17.6 % more forage DM and 14.8 % more CP compared to haying over the last two years. Root mass, SOC, and air temperature were key factors influencing soil CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, while soil nitrate-nitrogen mainly affected soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Compared to haying, grazing resulted in 22.6 % and 20.4 % lower GHGI for DM and CP yield, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Grazing offers an effective strategy for optimizing forage production and environmental performance in mixed perennial pastures in continental arid regions.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Our findings deliver insights into mitigating agricultural GHG emissions and enhancing food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 109788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037842902500053X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

In the context of global warming and increasing demands for forage production, optimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and forage production is crucial to sustainable pasture management in arid areas.

Objective

A 4-year experiment was conducted to compare the impacts of grazing versus haying on GHG emissions and forage yields in a mixed perennial pasture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) on a saline cropland.

Methods

Static box method was used to measure the monthly dynamics of soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes. We measured the forage dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) yields, and soil properties, and calculated the GHG intensity (GHGI) to assess the balance between forage yields and GHG emissions.

Results

We found that grazing reduced total GHG emissions by 17.2 % compared to haying in the second year; however, the reduction was later offset by nutrient enrichment from livestock manure. Grazing produced 17.6 % more forage DM and 14.8 % more CP compared to haying over the last two years. Root mass, SOC, and air temperature were key factors influencing soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes, while soil nitrate-nitrogen mainly affected soil N2O emissions. Compared to haying, grazing resulted in 22.6 % and 20.4 % lower GHGI for DM and CP yield, respectively.

Conclusions

Grazing offers an effective strategy for optimizing forage production and environmental performance in mixed perennial pastures in continental arid regions.

Implications

Our findings deliver insights into mitigating agricultural GHG emissions and enhancing food security.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Nitrogen and organic matter managements improve rice yield and affect greenhouse gas emissions in China’s rice-wheat system Regulation of subsurface drip fertigation on nitrogen cycling soil microorganisms and N2O and NH3 emissions from aeolian sandy soil in alfalfa field in temperate arid regions How do integrated agronomic practices enhance sunflower productivity and stability in saline-alkali soils of arid regions? Evidence from China Temporal and spatial patterns of N2O emissions in maize/legume strip intercropping: Effects of straw incorporation and crop interactions Engineered silicate-solubilizing bacterial community alleviates nutrient stress in field-grown maize by enhancing silicon uptake and optimizing rhizosphere microecology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1