Barriers to Creating a Market for Hydrogen: Insights from Global Roadmaps and Stakeholders in the United States

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103947
Ioana Iacob, M. Granger Morgan, Sabrina Curtis
{"title":"Barriers to Creating a Market for Hydrogen: Insights from Global Roadmaps and Stakeholders in the United States","authors":"Ioana Iacob,&nbsp;M. Granger Morgan,&nbsp;Sabrina Curtis","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyze barriers to setting up a hydrogen market by using a PESTEL framework that examines political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal barriers. This framework is advantageous for analyzing macro-environmental factors to understand potential challenges and opportunities in creating such a market. Internationally, the framework was applied to analyzing barriers in 56 national hydrogen roadmaps, and domestically in the U.S. to semi-structured interviews with 43 stakeholders involved with hydrogen projects across the U.S. today. In the country-level international analysis, infrastructure development was the most identified barrier, with 43 countries including this factor. Infrastructure development included infrastructure for hydrogen storage, transportation, and distribution, and frequently alluded not only to the need for the infrastructure, but also the costs associated. The second most identified barrier was related to the need for market development - including but not limited to capital costs, economic competition, supply and demand matching, and first-mover reticence. For the domestic analysis, results from qualitative content analysis confirmed considerable variability across regions and stakeholder backgrounds. Particularly notable were divergent views about the importance of public understanding of and support for hydrogen projects, with industry respondents arguing this was not important and government and academic respondents considering it very important. The barriers seen as having the largest impact on deployment of hydrogen projects was a lack of regulatory clarity and lack of decision makers’ knowledge and awareness. Domestically, the most often introduced barriers were the need for the support of market demand, and the need to develop a hydrogen workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103947"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyze barriers to setting up a hydrogen market by using a PESTEL framework that examines political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal barriers. This framework is advantageous for analyzing macro-environmental factors to understand potential challenges and opportunities in creating such a market. Internationally, the framework was applied to analyzing barriers in 56 national hydrogen roadmaps, and domestically in the U.S. to semi-structured interviews with 43 stakeholders involved with hydrogen projects across the U.S. today. In the country-level international analysis, infrastructure development was the most identified barrier, with 43 countries including this factor. Infrastructure development included infrastructure for hydrogen storage, transportation, and distribution, and frequently alluded not only to the need for the infrastructure, but also the costs associated. The second most identified barrier was related to the need for market development - including but not limited to capital costs, economic competition, supply and demand matching, and first-mover reticence. For the domestic analysis, results from qualitative content analysis confirmed considerable variability across regions and stakeholder backgrounds. Particularly notable were divergent views about the importance of public understanding of and support for hydrogen projects, with industry respondents arguing this was not important and government and academic respondents considering it very important. The barriers seen as having the largest impact on deployment of hydrogen projects was a lack of regulatory clarity and lack of decision makers’ knowledge and awareness. Domestically, the most often introduced barriers were the need for the support of market demand, and the need to develop a hydrogen workforce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建氢市场的障碍:来自全球路线图和美国利益相关者的见解
我们通过使用PESTEL框架来分析建立氢市场的障碍,该框架考察了政治、经济、社会、技术、环境和法律障碍。这个框架有利于分析宏观环境因素,以了解创建这样一个市场的潜在挑战和机遇。在国际上,该框架被用于分析56个国家氢能路线图中的障碍,在美国国内,该框架被用于对43个参与美国氢能项目的利益相关者进行半结构化访谈。在国家一级的国际分析中,基础设施发展是最明确的障碍,有43个国家包括这一因素。基础设施开发包括氢储存、运输和分配的基础设施,经常不仅提到对基础设施的需求,还提到相关的成本。第二大确定的障碍与市场发展的需要有关,包括但不限于资本成本、经济竞争、供需匹配和先发者沉默。对于国内分析,定性内容分析的结果证实了区域和利益相关者背景之间存在相当大的差异。特别值得注意的是,公众对氢项目的理解和支持的重要性存在分歧,行业受访者认为这并不重要,而政府和学术界受访者认为这非常重要。被认为对氢项目部署影响最大的障碍是缺乏监管透明度和决策者缺乏知识和意识。在国内,最常引入的障碍是需要支持市场需求,以及需要发展氢劳动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1