Introduction to the Special Issue: Exploring the Policy–Mobilization Nexus: How Policies and Mobilizations Shape One Another

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/polp.70000
Marcos Ancelovici, Joëlle Dussault, Montserrat Emperador Badimon
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Exploring the Policy–Mobilization Nexus: How Policies and Mobilizations Shape One Another","authors":"Marcos Ancelovici,&nbsp;Joëlle Dussault,&nbsp;Montserrat Emperador Badimon","doi":"10.1111/polp.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although public policies and social mobilizations often shape one another, policy studies and social movement studies have focused on distinct dimensions of the “policy–mobilization nexus.” Such segmented perspectives generate blind spots and partial accounts of both the policy process and social mobilization dynamics. This special issue unpacks the policy–mobilization nexus and brings together papers that analyze the interactions between public policy and protest in different policy domains (family, housing, education, and health) in four countries (Chile, Quebec, Spain, and the United States). It makes three contributions. First, it stresses the contentious nature of the policy-making process and shows that many social actors combine disruptive and conciliatory modes of action. Second, it challenges standard arguments according to which social movements shape the policy process only indirectly, through agenda-setting. Finally, it takes temporal dynamics seriously and stresses the need to treat policies not as an output or outcome but as a process with no clear starting and end points.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although public policies and social mobilizations often shape one another, policy studies and social movement studies have focused on distinct dimensions of the “policy–mobilization nexus.” Such segmented perspectives generate blind spots and partial accounts of both the policy process and social mobilization dynamics. This special issue unpacks the policy–mobilization nexus and brings together papers that analyze the interactions between public policy and protest in different policy domains (family, housing, education, and health) in four countries (Chile, Quebec, Spain, and the United States). It makes three contributions. First, it stresses the contentious nature of the policy-making process and shows that many social actors combine disruptive and conciliatory modes of action. Second, it challenges standard arguments according to which social movements shape the policy process only indirectly, through agenda-setting. Finally, it takes temporal dynamics seriously and stresses the need to treat policies not as an output or outcome but as a process with no clear starting and end points.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特刊导论:探索政策-动员关系:政策和动员如何相互影响
虽然公共政策和社会动员经常相互影响,但政策研究和社会运动研究侧重于“政策动员关系”的不同维度。这种分割的观点产生了政策过程和社会动员动态的盲点和部分解释。本期特刊揭示了政策动员之间的联系,汇集了分析四个国家(智利、魁北克、西班牙和美国)不同政策领域(家庭、住房、教育和卫生)公共政策与抗议之间相互作用的论文。它有三个贡献。首先,它强调了政策制定过程的争议性,并表明许多社会行动者结合了破坏性和和解性的行动模式。其次,它挑战了传统观点,即社会运动只是通过议程设定间接地影响政策过程。最后,它认真对待时间动态,强调必须把政策不是作为产出或结果,而是作为没有明确起点和终点的过程来对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Note From the Editor and Call for Papers: Policy Studies Yearbook Annual Review 2025–26 Shaping Institutions: Exploring the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Institutional Change in Sub-Saharan Africa Whose Voices Are Heard? Parliamentary Committee Witnesses as Gendered Representatives Special Issue: Personalism and Good Governance—Notes on Contributors Illusions of Control: Authoritarian Learning and the Geopolitics of Technocratic Tyranny
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1