Canadian Democracy at Risk? A Wakeup Call From the Perspective of English-Speaking Citizens

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/polp.70008
Daniel Stockemer, Valere Gaspard
{"title":"Canadian Democracy at Risk? A Wakeup Call From the Perspective of English-Speaking Citizens","authors":"Daniel Stockemer,&nbsp;Valere Gaspard","doi":"10.1111/polp.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>At first glance, Canada is a resilient democracy. It has so far resisted international trends of democratic decline, it has not had any major populist upheavals aside from the Freedom Convoy in 2022, and no extremist parties are in parliament. However, if we look at public opinion data, we find widespread democratic disillusionment. An online representative survey of English-speaking Canadians shows that more than 30% of the respondents indicate that they have no trust in democracy, more than 40% claim that the government controls what they can say, nearly 50% do not feel represented by government, and two thirds of the sample feel some sort of moral decay. These numbers illustrate a concerning gap between the preoccupations of large parts of English-speaking Canadians and the institutions of representative democracy—especially since disillusionment can weaken democratic safeguards and increase the likeliness of a surge of populist politicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Béland, D., G. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, and P. Rocco. (2024). “Policy Feedback, Varieties of Federalism, and the Politics of Health-Care Funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 52, no. (1): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575.</p>\n \n <p>Denis, C. (2007). “Canadians in Trouble Abroad: Citizenship, Personal Security, and North American Regionalization.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 35, no. (4): 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x.</p>\n \n <p>Stockemer, D., and S. Parent. (2014). “The Inequality Turnout Nexus: New Evidence from Presidential Elections.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 42, no. (2): 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At first glance, Canada is a resilient democracy. It has so far resisted international trends of democratic decline, it has not had any major populist upheavals aside from the Freedom Convoy in 2022, and no extremist parties are in parliament. However, if we look at public opinion data, we find widespread democratic disillusionment. An online representative survey of English-speaking Canadians shows that more than 30% of the respondents indicate that they have no trust in democracy, more than 40% claim that the government controls what they can say, nearly 50% do not feel represented by government, and two thirds of the sample feel some sort of moral decay. These numbers illustrate a concerning gap between the preoccupations of large parts of English-speaking Canadians and the institutions of representative democracy—especially since disillusionment can weaken democratic safeguards and increase the likeliness of a surge of populist politicians.

Related Articles

Béland, D., G. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, and P. Rocco. (2024). “Policy Feedback, Varieties of Federalism, and the Politics of Health-Care Funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.” Politics & Policy 52, no. (1): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575.

Denis, C. (2007). “Canadians in Trouble Abroad: Citizenship, Personal Security, and North American Regionalization.” Politics & Policy 35, no. (4): 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x.

Stockemer, D., and S. Parent. (2014). “The Inequality Turnout Nexus: New Evidence from Presidential Elections.” Politics & Policy 42, no. (2): 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大民主面临风险?英语国家公民视角下的警钟
乍一看,加拿大是一个有弹性的民主国家。到目前为止,它一直抵制着民主衰落的国际趋势,除了2022年的自由车队之外,它还没有发生任何重大的民粹主义动荡,议会中也没有极端主义政党。然而,如果我们看一下民意数据,我们会发现普遍存在的民主幻灭。一项针对说英语的加拿大人的在线代表性调查显示,超过30%的受访者表示他们不信任民主,超过40%的人声称政府控制着他们的言论,近50%的人觉得政府不代表他们,三分之二的样本感到某种道德败坏。这些数字表明,大部分讲英语的加拿大人的关注点与代议制民主制度之间存在着令人担忧的差距——尤其是因为幻灭会削弱民主保障,增加民粹主义政客激增的可能性。相关文章bacheland, D. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, P. Rocco。(2024). “政策反馈,联邦制的多样性,以及美国、墨西哥和加拿大医疗保健资金的政治。”政治,政策52,不。(1): 51 - 69。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575。丹尼斯,C.(2007)。在国外遇到麻烦的加拿大人:公民身份、个人安全与北美区域化。政治,政策35,不。(4): 648 - 663。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x。斯托克默,D.和S. Parent。(2014). “不平等投票率关系:来自总统选举的新证据。”政治,政策42,不。(2): 221 - 245。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Whose Voices Are Heard? Parliamentary Committee Witnesses as Gendered Representatives Special Issue: Personalism and Good Governance—Notes on Contributors Illusions of Control: Authoritarian Learning and the Geopolitics of Technocratic Tyranny The Impact of Tax Incentives on GVC Volatility: Evidence From Chinese Listed Companies 税收优惠对全球价值链波动的影响:来自中国上市公司的证据 El Impacto De Los Incentivos Fiscales En La Volatilidad De Las Cadenas De Valor Globales: Evidencia De Las Empresas Chinas Que Cotizan En Bolsa Examining the Perspectives of Key Stakeholders on the Problems, Policies, and Politics Regarding Accessing Psychedelic Interventions to Alleviate End-of-Life Distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1