{"title":"Canadian Democracy at Risk? A Wakeup Call From the Perspective of English-Speaking Citizens","authors":"Daniel Stockemer, Valere Gaspard","doi":"10.1111/polp.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>At first glance, Canada is a resilient democracy. It has so far resisted international trends of democratic decline, it has not had any major populist upheavals aside from the Freedom Convoy in 2022, and no extremist parties are in parliament. However, if we look at public opinion data, we find widespread democratic disillusionment. An online representative survey of English-speaking Canadians shows that more than 30% of the respondents indicate that they have no trust in democracy, more than 40% claim that the government controls what they can say, nearly 50% do not feel represented by government, and two thirds of the sample feel some sort of moral decay. These numbers illustrate a concerning gap between the preoccupations of large parts of English-speaking Canadians and the institutions of representative democracy—especially since disillusionment can weaken democratic safeguards and increase the likeliness of a surge of populist politicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Béland, D., G. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, and P. Rocco. (2024). “Policy Feedback, Varieties of Federalism, and the Politics of Health-Care Funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 52, no. (1): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575.</p>\n \n <p>Denis, C. (2007). “Canadians in Trouble Abroad: Citizenship, Personal Security, and North American Regionalization.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 35, no. (4): 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x.</p>\n \n <p>Stockemer, D., and S. Parent. (2014). “The Inequality Turnout Nexus: New Evidence from Presidential Elections.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 42, no. (2): 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At first glance, Canada is a resilient democracy. It has so far resisted international trends of democratic decline, it has not had any major populist upheavals aside from the Freedom Convoy in 2022, and no extremist parties are in parliament. However, if we look at public opinion data, we find widespread democratic disillusionment. An online representative survey of English-speaking Canadians shows that more than 30% of the respondents indicate that they have no trust in democracy, more than 40% claim that the government controls what they can say, nearly 50% do not feel represented by government, and two thirds of the sample feel some sort of moral decay. These numbers illustrate a concerning gap between the preoccupations of large parts of English-speaking Canadians and the institutions of representative democracy—especially since disillusionment can weaken democratic safeguards and increase the likeliness of a surge of populist politicians.
Related Articles
Béland, D., G. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, and P. Rocco. (2024). “Policy Feedback, Varieties of Federalism, and the Politics of Health-Care Funding in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.” Politics & Policy 52, no. (1): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575.
Denis, C. (2007). “Canadians in Trouble Abroad: Citizenship, Personal Security, and North American Regionalization.” Politics & Policy 35, no. (4): 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x.
Stockemer, D., and S. Parent. (2014). “The Inequality Turnout Nexus: New Evidence from Presidential Elections.” Politics & Policy 42, no. (2): 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067.
乍一看,加拿大是一个有弹性的民主国家。到目前为止,它一直抵制着民主衰落的国际趋势,除了2022年的自由车队之外,它还没有发生任何重大的民粹主义动荡,议会中也没有极端主义政党。然而,如果我们看一下民意数据,我们会发现普遍存在的民主幻灭。一项针对说英语的加拿大人的在线代表性调查显示,超过30%的受访者表示他们不信任民主,超过40%的人声称政府控制着他们的言论,近50%的人觉得政府不代表他们,三分之二的样本感到某种道德败坏。这些数字表明,大部分讲英语的加拿大人的关注点与代议制民主制度之间存在着令人担忧的差距——尤其是因为幻灭会削弱民主保障,增加民粹主义政客激增的可能性。相关文章bacheland, D. P. Marchildon, A. Medrano, P. Rocco。(2024). “政策反馈,联邦制的多样性,以及美国、墨西哥和加拿大医疗保健资金的政治。”政治,政策52,不。(1): 51 - 69。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12575。丹尼斯,C.(2007)。在国外遇到麻烦的加拿大人:公民身份、个人安全与北美区域化。政治,政策35,不。(4): 648 - 663。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00078.x。斯托克默,D.和S. Parent。(2014). “不平等投票率关系:来自总统选举的新证据。”政治,政策42,不。(2): 221 - 245。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12067。