Efficiency of steel fibers in geopolymer and Portland cement concrete: Comparative evaluation of fiber bonding and crack bridging stress

IF 10.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Cement & concrete composites Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.105988
Sohanth Tej Maganty, Kolluru V.L. Subramaniam
{"title":"Efficiency of steel fibers in geopolymer and Portland cement concrete: Comparative evaluation of fiber bonding and crack bridging stress","authors":"Sohanth Tej Maganty,&nbsp;Kolluru V.L. Subramaniam","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.105988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bond of steel fibers with Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) is evaluated. The pullout response of the steel fiber is related to the cohesive fracture response of steel fiber-reinforced GPC and PCC. The crack propagation in fracture tests of GPC and PCC with hooked-end steel fibers at dosages of 25 kg/m<sup>3</sup> and 45 kg/m<sup>3</sup> is evaluated using digital image correlation (DIC). With the addition of fibers, there is a more significant improvement in the fracture test performance of GPC compared to PCC. The steel fibers demonstrate a higher resistance to pullout from the GPC than the PCC. The dense geopolymer gel around the steel fiber enhances stress transfer, mobilizing significantly higher initial resistance during the fiber pullout. The stronger bond between the GPC matrix and the steel fibers increases the resistance to debonding during the initial stages of fiber pullout. The higher peak pullout load at low slip levels indicates more effective fiber engagement in generating crack-bridging stresses. This enhancement in fiber efficiency to pullout from the GPC matrix results in improved resistance to crack propagation and a significant increase in cohesive stress at small crack openings. The fibers provide better post-cracking load resistance in GPC than PCC, even at a fiber dosage as low as 25 kg/m<sup>3</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9865,"journal":{"name":"Cement & concrete composites","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105988"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement & concrete composites","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946525000708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bond of steel fibers with Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) is evaluated. The pullout response of the steel fiber is related to the cohesive fracture response of steel fiber-reinforced GPC and PCC. The crack propagation in fracture tests of GPC and PCC with hooked-end steel fibers at dosages of 25 kg/m3 and 45 kg/m3 is evaluated using digital image correlation (DIC). With the addition of fibers, there is a more significant improvement in the fracture test performance of GPC compared to PCC. The steel fibers demonstrate a higher resistance to pullout from the GPC than the PCC. The dense geopolymer gel around the steel fiber enhances stress transfer, mobilizing significantly higher initial resistance during the fiber pullout. The stronger bond between the GPC matrix and the steel fibers increases the resistance to debonding during the initial stages of fiber pullout. The higher peak pullout load at low slip levels indicates more effective fiber engagement in generating crack-bridging stresses. This enhancement in fiber efficiency to pullout from the GPC matrix results in improved resistance to crack propagation and a significant increase in cohesive stress at small crack openings. The fibers provide better post-cracking load resistance in GPC than PCC, even at a fiber dosage as low as 25 kg/m3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢纤维在土工聚合物和波特兰水泥混凝土中的效率:纤维粘结和裂缝桥接应力的比较评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cement & concrete composites
Cement & concrete composites 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Cement & concrete composites focuses on advancements in cement-concrete composite technology and the production, use, and performance of cement-based construction materials. It covers a wide range of materials, including fiber-reinforced composites, polymer composites, ferrocement, and those incorporating special aggregates or waste materials. Major themes include microstructure, material properties, testing, durability, mechanics, modeling, design, fabrication, and practical applications. The journal welcomes papers on structural behavior, field studies, repair and maintenance, serviceability, and sustainability. It aims to enhance understanding, provide a platform for unconventional materials, promote low-cost energy-saving materials, and bridge the gap between materials science, engineering, and construction. Special issues on emerging topics are also published to encourage collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, designers, and fabricators.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Reaction mechanisms of one-part and two-part slag-based binders activated by sodium carbonate and lime Competing mechanisms of cement hydrates and anhydrous phases at ambient and 120 °C carbonation Early-age hydration of accelerated low-carbon cements for digital fabrication Efficiency of steel fibers in geopolymer and Portland cement concrete: Comparative evaluation of fiber bonding and crack bridging stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1