Indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery.

Mehmet Bahadır Demir, Suleyman Utku Celik, Sahin Kaymak
{"title":"Indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery.","authors":"Mehmet Bahadır Demir, Suleyman Utku Celik, Sahin Kaymak","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.32736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery is a critical intervention associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, data on relaparotomy in trauma patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of relaparotomy-related factors on prognosis in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed adult patients who underwent relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery at a single center between December 2016 and December 2022. Demographic characteristics, trauma-related features, and perioperative clinical findings were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 300 patients who underwent abdominal trauma surgery, 106 (35.3%) required relaparotomy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.4%. Major indications for relaparotomy included hemorrhage control, hemodynamic instability, and intestinal leaks. Factors significantly associated with increased mortality included age ≥50 years (p=0.020), female sex (p=0.031), blunt trauma (p=0.020), multiple relaparotomies (p=0.023), active hemorrhage during relaparotomy (p<0.001), and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (p=0.046). Additionally, non-survivors demonstrated significantly lower blood pressure (p<0.001) and higher heart rates (p<0.001). They also presented with decreased levels of hemoglobin (p=0.015), platelet counts (p=0.001), and albumin (p<0.001), along with elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (p<0.001) and lactate levels (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights key factors associated with mortality in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery. Early recognition and optimization of risk factors, along with the management of active hemorrhage, careful monitoring of vital signs and laboratory parameters, and special attention to high-risk groups such as older patients and those with blunt trauma, may improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 2","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.32736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery is a critical intervention associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, data on relaparotomy in trauma patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of relaparotomy-related factors on prognosis in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed adult patients who underwent relaparotomy following abdominal trauma surgery at a single center between December 2016 and December 2022. Demographic characteristics, trauma-related features, and perioperative clinical findings were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

Results: Among 300 patients who underwent abdominal trauma surgery, 106 (35.3%) required relaparotomy. The in-hospital mortality rate was 9.4%. Major indications for relaparotomy included hemorrhage control, hemodynamic instability, and intestinal leaks. Factors significantly associated with increased mortality included age ≥50 years (p=0.020), female sex (p=0.031), blunt trauma (p=0.020), multiple relaparotomies (p=0.023), active hemorrhage during relaparotomy (p<0.001), and fresh frozen plasma transfusion (p=0.046). Additionally, non-survivors demonstrated significantly lower blood pressure (p<0.001) and higher heart rates (p<0.001). They also presented with decreased levels of hemoglobin (p=0.015), platelet counts (p=0.001), and albumin (p<0.001), along with elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (p<0.001) and lactate levels (p<0.001).

Conclusion: This study highlights key factors associated with mortality in patients undergoing relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery. Early recognition and optimization of risk factors, along with the management of active hemorrhage, careful monitoring of vital signs and laboratory parameters, and special attention to high-risk groups such as older patients and those with blunt trauma, may improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of pediatric gunshot wounds and emergency department dynamics in high-volume incidents. Indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of relaparotomy after abdominal trauma surgery. Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in the emergency department: Evaluating the role of laboratory and radiological findings in a retrospective study. Melatonin as a shield against skeletal muscle damage: A study on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mid- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for distal tibial physeal fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1