Association of houselessness and outcomes after traumatic injury: A retrospective, matched cohort study at an urban, academic level-one trauma center

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112214
Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones , Sophia M Smith , Anna J Kobzeva-Herzog , Maia R Nofal , Monica Abou-Ezzi , Miranda Melici , Priya Desai , Ann Fefferman , Tracey A Dechert , Megan G Janeway , Sabrina E Sanchez
{"title":"Association of houselessness and outcomes after traumatic injury: A retrospective, matched cohort study at an urban, academic level-one trauma center","authors":"Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones ,&nbsp;Sophia M Smith ,&nbsp;Anna J Kobzeva-Herzog ,&nbsp;Maia R Nofal ,&nbsp;Monica Abou-Ezzi ,&nbsp;Miranda Melici ,&nbsp;Priya Desai ,&nbsp;Ann Fefferman ,&nbsp;Tracey A Dechert ,&nbsp;Megan G Janeway ,&nbsp;Sabrina E Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Houselessness is associated with increased mortality and unmet health needs. Current understanding of traumatic injury in houseless patients is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective matched cohort study among houseless and housed adults, admitted to an urban, safety net, level I trauma center from 1/1/2018–12/31/2021. Houseless patients were matched with their housed counterparts 1:2 based on age, sex, injury severity score (ISS) and nature of injury. The primary outcome was in-hospital adverse events. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), outpatient follow-up, emergency department (ED) utilization post-injury, and readmission. Conditional multivariable regression was used to determine associations between the exposure and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1413 patients were included; 471 houseless patients and 942 matched controls. Median [IQR] age was 42 years [31–58] and median [IQR] ISS was 9 [5–13] for all patients. About 30 % of traumatic injuries were violent in nature. Median [IQR] total LOS was longer for houseless patients (4.4 days [2.0–8.3] vs. 3.1 days [1.4–6.5], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Houseless patients were more frequently admitted to the ICU (5 % versus 3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.045). The rate of any in-hospital adverse event was similar (houseless 17 % vs. housed 16 %, <em>p</em> = 0.537). Adjusting for age, sex, language, insurance, ISS, nature of injury, injury mechanism, ICU admission, and operative intervention, houselessness was inversely associated with outpatient follow-up (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.46–0.79) and positively associated with ED representation (OR 2.49, 95 % CI 1.64–3.78) and hospital readmission (OR 4.35, 95 % CI 3.19–5.92).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Housing status was not associated with increased in-hospital morbidity or mortality in trauma patients in a single institution cohort of trauma patients. Unhoused patients had lower odds of completing outpatient injury-specific follow-up and higher odds of utilizing the ED within 30 days of discharge. These findings highlight gaps in post-discharge care coordination and underscore opportunities to improve discharge services for this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 5","pages":"Article 112214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Houselessness is associated with increased mortality and unmet health needs. Current understanding of traumatic injury in houseless patients is limited.

Methods

This is a retrospective matched cohort study among houseless and housed adults, admitted to an urban, safety net, level I trauma center from 1/1/2018–12/31/2021. Houseless patients were matched with their housed counterparts 1:2 based on age, sex, injury severity score (ISS) and nature of injury. The primary outcome was in-hospital adverse events. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), outpatient follow-up, emergency department (ED) utilization post-injury, and readmission. Conditional multivariable regression was used to determine associations between the exposure and outcomes.

Results

1413 patients were included; 471 houseless patients and 942 matched controls. Median [IQR] age was 42 years [31–58] and median [IQR] ISS was 9 [5–13] for all patients. About 30 % of traumatic injuries were violent in nature. Median [IQR] total LOS was longer for houseless patients (4.4 days [2.0–8.3] vs. 3.1 days [1.4–6.5], p < 0.001). Houseless patients were more frequently admitted to the ICU (5 % versus 3 %, p = 0.045). The rate of any in-hospital adverse event was similar (houseless 17 % vs. housed 16 %, p = 0.537). Adjusting for age, sex, language, insurance, ISS, nature of injury, injury mechanism, ICU admission, and operative intervention, houselessness was inversely associated with outpatient follow-up (OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.46–0.79) and positively associated with ED representation (OR 2.49, 95 % CI 1.64–3.78) and hospital readmission (OR 4.35, 95 % CI 3.19–5.92).

Conclusions

Housing status was not associated with increased in-hospital morbidity or mortality in trauma patients in a single institution cohort of trauma patients. Unhoused patients had lower odds of completing outpatient injury-specific follow-up and higher odds of utilizing the ED within 30 days of discharge. These findings highlight gaps in post-discharge care coordination and underscore opportunities to improve discharge services for this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性损伤后无家可归与预后的关系:一项在城市一级创伤中心进行的回顾性、匹配队列研究。
背景:无家可归与死亡率上升和卫生需求未得到满足有关。目前对无家可归病人的创伤性损伤的了解是有限的。方法:这是一项回顾性匹配队列研究,研究对象是2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日在城市安全网一级创伤中心入院的无家可归和有房的成年人。根据年龄、性别、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和损伤性质,将无家可归的患者与有房的患者进行1:2的匹配。主要结局为院内不良事件。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、门诊随访、伤后急诊科(ED)使用率和再入院。使用条件多变量回归来确定暴露与结果之间的关系。结果:纳入1413例患者;471名无家可归的病人和942名匹配的对照组。所有患者的中位[IQR]年龄为42岁[31-58],中位[IQR] ISS为9[5-13]。大约30%的外伤是暴力性质的。无房患者的中位[IQR]总LOS更长(4.4天[2.0-8.3]vs. 3.1天[1.4-6.5],p < 0.001)。无房患者入住ICU的频率更高(5%比3%,p = 0.045)。任何住院不良事件的发生率相似(无房者17% vs有房者16%,p = 0.537)。调整年龄、性别、语言、保险、ISS、损伤性质、损伤机制、ICU入院和手术干预等因素后,无家可归与门诊随访呈负相关(OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.79),与ED表现(OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.64-3.78)和再入院(OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.19-5.92)呈正相关。结论:在单一机构创伤患者队列中,住房状况与创伤患者住院发病率或死亡率的增加无关。无房患者在出院后30天内完成门诊损伤特异性随访的几率较低,使用急诊科的几率较高。这些发现突出了出院后护理协调方面的差距,并强调了改善这一人群出院服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Encouraging recovery or avoiding risk? A proposed clinical framework for rehabilitation decision-making after fragility fractures Household head injuries in infants presenting to a tertiary pediatric emergency: A retrospective study Trends in nature and magnitude of industry payments to residency program directors and department chairman in orthopaedic surgery Soft bandage vs rigid immobilisation in pediatric distal radius torus fractures: A cost and patient burden analysis — A retrospective cohort study Forecasting complications: The role of inflammatory indices in acute peripheral vascular pathologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1