Comparative assessment of sewer sampling methods for infectious disease surveillance: Insights from transport modeling and simulations of SARS-CoV-2 emissions
Min Jeong Ban, Keugtae Kim, Sungpyo Kim, Lan Hee Kim, Joo-Hyon Kang
{"title":"Comparative assessment of sewer sampling methods for infectious disease surveillance: Insights from transport modeling and simulations of SARS-CoV-2 emissions","authors":"Min Jeong Ban, Keugtae Kim, Sungpyo Kim, Lan Hee Kim, Joo-Hyon Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19 present significant public health challenges, necessitating effective surveillance methods. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE), detecting viral pathogens in wastewater, has emerged as a proactive tool for monitoring infections. This study evaluated various wastewter sampling methods through SARS-CoV-2 transport simulations in an urban sewer network in Sejong City, South Korea, to identify cost-effective strategies for accurate infection monitoring. Using the U.S. EPA's Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, we simulated wastewater flow and viral concentrations based on reported COVID-19 case data for the year 2021. In this study, we used reported COVID-19 cases as a hypothetical estimate of the number of infected individuals in the simulation. The SWMM effectively replicated daily and monthly patterns in sewer flow rates. Combining the SWMM with MCMC sampling from the probability distributions of spatio-temporal virus emission patterns, we generated an ensemble time series dataset of hourly virus concentrations based on 200 simulations, forming the basis for evaluating sampling alternatives. Results showed a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.81) between daily average virus concentrations and daily infection rates on the fifth day following new infections, consistent with simulated viral emission patterns. Flow-weighted and equally timed sampling methods provided highly reliable infection pattern estimates, suggesting that equally timed sampling is a cost-effective alternative. In contrast, grab sampling performed poorly due to difficulties in capturing peak viral emission periods. We found that a minimum sampling duration of four to six hours was crucial for accurate detection, with performance increasing if the sampling was applied in the morning (R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.7). Longer durations steadily, but only slightly, improved results. While this simulation-based approach focused on predicting daily virus concentration patterns in wastewater rather than precisely estimating its absolute levels, it provides valuable insights for optimizing WBE in public health surveillance and underscores the need for further validation with real-world data.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19 present significant public health challenges, necessitating effective surveillance methods. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE), detecting viral pathogens in wastewater, has emerged as a proactive tool for monitoring infections. This study evaluated various wastewter sampling methods through SARS-CoV-2 transport simulations in an urban sewer network in Sejong City, South Korea, to identify cost-effective strategies for accurate infection monitoring. Using the U.S. EPA's Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, we simulated wastewater flow and viral concentrations based on reported COVID-19 case data for the year 2021. In this study, we used reported COVID-19 cases as a hypothetical estimate of the number of infected individuals in the simulation. The SWMM effectively replicated daily and monthly patterns in sewer flow rates. Combining the SWMM with MCMC sampling from the probability distributions of spatio-temporal virus emission patterns, we generated an ensemble time series dataset of hourly virus concentrations based on 200 simulations, forming the basis for evaluating sampling alternatives. Results showed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.81) between daily average virus concentrations and daily infection rates on the fifth day following new infections, consistent with simulated viral emission patterns. Flow-weighted and equally timed sampling methods provided highly reliable infection pattern estimates, suggesting that equally timed sampling is a cost-effective alternative. In contrast, grab sampling performed poorly due to difficulties in capturing peak viral emission periods. We found that a minimum sampling duration of four to six hours was crucial for accurate detection, with performance increasing if the sampling was applied in the morning (R2 ≈ 0.7). Longer durations steadily, but only slightly, improved results. While this simulation-based approach focused on predicting daily virus concentration patterns in wastewater rather than precisely estimating its absolute levels, it provides valuable insights for optimizing WBE in public health surveillance and underscores the need for further validation with real-world data.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.