A User-Centric Approach to Reliable Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis for Biomedical Applications.

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Cytometry Part A Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.24913
Georg Popp, Lisa Jöckel, Michael Kläs, Thomas Wiener, Nadja Hilger, Nils Stumpf, Janek Groß, Anna Dünkel, Ulrich Blache, Stephan Fricke, Paul Franz
{"title":"A User-Centric Approach to Reliable Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis for Biomedical Applications.","authors":"Georg Popp, Lisa Jöckel, Michael Kläs, Thomas Wiener, Nadja Hilger, Nils Stumpf, Janek Groß, Anna Dünkel, Ulrich Blache, Stephan Fricke, Paul Franz","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automation and the increased number of measurable parameters in flow cytometry (FCM) have strongly increased the volume and complexity of phenotyping immune cell populations. Despite numerous automated gating methods for FCM analysis, their adoption in routine practice remains challenging due to accessibility barriers for users and potential model failures. Here, we propose a user-centered solution that combines elements of supervised machine learning (SML), rapid application development (RAD), systematic quality assurance guided by structured argumentation, and uncertainty estimation to address these challenges. We implement a data-driven model for event classification and use RAD to generate software prototypes, allowing FCM users to apply the model for automated gating. Considering concepts for structured argumentation from assurance cases (ACs), we derived and justified quality analyses that inform users about the quality of the model. We propose guiding the model operation phase using uncertainty estimation to provide users with a clear understanding of the model's confidence in its predictions. We aim to overcome barriers to the routine application of automated gating and contribute to more reliable and efficient FCM data analysis. Our approach is based on the application of phenotyping for human immune cells. We encourage future research to investigate the potential of SML, ACs, and uncertainty estimation to address dependability of data-driven models (DDMs) supporting diagnostic decision making in the medical domain, including FCM in clinical applications and highly regulated areas such as pharmaceutical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automation and the increased number of measurable parameters in flow cytometry (FCM) have strongly increased the volume and complexity of phenotyping immune cell populations. Despite numerous automated gating methods for FCM analysis, their adoption in routine practice remains challenging due to accessibility barriers for users and potential model failures. Here, we propose a user-centered solution that combines elements of supervised machine learning (SML), rapid application development (RAD), systematic quality assurance guided by structured argumentation, and uncertainty estimation to address these challenges. We implement a data-driven model for event classification and use RAD to generate software prototypes, allowing FCM users to apply the model for automated gating. Considering concepts for structured argumentation from assurance cases (ACs), we derived and justified quality analyses that inform users about the quality of the model. We propose guiding the model operation phase using uncertainty estimation to provide users with a clear understanding of the model's confidence in its predictions. We aim to overcome barriers to the routine application of automated gating and contribute to more reliable and efficient FCM data analysis. Our approach is based on the application of phenotyping for human immune cells. We encourage future research to investigate the potential of SML, ACs, and uncertainty estimation to address dependability of data-driven models (DDMs) supporting diagnostic decision making in the medical domain, including FCM in clinical applications and highly regulated areas such as pharmaceutical research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
期刊最新文献
A User-Centric Approach to Reliable Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis for Biomedical Applications. Investigating T-Cell Receptor Dynamics Under In Vitro Antibody-Based Stimulation Using Imaging Flow Cytometry. Quantifying Nuclear Structures of Digital Pathology Images Across Cancers Using Transport-Based Morphometry. CytoNorm 2.0: A flexible normalization framework for cytometry data without requiring dedicated controls. A 37-Color Spectral Flow Cytometric Panel to Assess Transcription Factors and Chemokine Receptors in Human Intestinal Lymphoid Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1