One State Under Multiple Nations? The Challenge of Building a Plurinational State in Ecuador and Bolivia (2007–2018)

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1111/polp.70017
Daniela Maag
{"title":"One State Under Multiple Nations? The Challenge of Building a Plurinational State in Ecuador and Bolivia (2007–2018)","authors":"Daniela Maag","doi":"10.1111/polp.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>What happens when the state acknowledges the existence of multiple “true” nations or “pueblos” within the context of a single state? How does a leader in a state with multiple nations, a plurinational state, choose between honoring cultural diversity and promoting economic growth? This article analyzes Ecuador and Bolivia—two countries that have constitutionally declared themselves plurinational states—to argue that, depending on the composition of each ruler's supporter base, presidents will choose to prioritize one set of goals over the other. On one hand, Rafael Correa was able to prioritize economic policies in Ecuador at the expense of cultural ones, hence losing out on indigenous support. On the other hand, while Evo Morales of Bolivia initially moved in favor of cultural policies, indigenous communities later critiqued him for favoring increasingly extractive projects. This article has important implications for the study of state and nationhood in the context of increased indigenous mobilization; it highlights the difficulties of balancing policy decisions around economic welfare, environmental protection, and social inclusion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Aguiar Aguilar, A. A. 2023. “Courts and the Judicial Erosion of Democracy in Latin America.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 51, no. 1: 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12516.</p>\n \n <p>Basabe-Serrano, S. 2012. “Presidential Power and the Judicialization of Politics as Determinants of Institutional Change in the Judiciary: The Supreme Court of Ecuador (1979–2009).” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 40, no. 2: 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00348.x.</p>\n \n <p>Nohlen, D. 2009. “Constitutional Jurisdiction and the Consolidation of Democracy.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 37, no. 1: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2008.00159.x.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What happens when the state acknowledges the existence of multiple “true” nations or “pueblos” within the context of a single state? How does a leader in a state with multiple nations, a plurinational state, choose between honoring cultural diversity and promoting economic growth? This article analyzes Ecuador and Bolivia—two countries that have constitutionally declared themselves plurinational states—to argue that, depending on the composition of each ruler's supporter base, presidents will choose to prioritize one set of goals over the other. On one hand, Rafael Correa was able to prioritize economic policies in Ecuador at the expense of cultural ones, hence losing out on indigenous support. On the other hand, while Evo Morales of Bolivia initially moved in favor of cultural policies, indigenous communities later critiqued him for favoring increasingly extractive projects. This article has important implications for the study of state and nationhood in the context of increased indigenous mobilization; it highlights the difficulties of balancing policy decisions around economic welfare, environmental protection, and social inclusion.

Related Articles

Aguiar Aguilar, A. A. 2023. “Courts and the Judicial Erosion of Democracy in Latin America.” Politics & Policy 51, no. 1: 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12516.

Basabe-Serrano, S. 2012. “Presidential Power and the Judicialization of Politics as Determinants of Institutional Change in the Judiciary: The Supreme Court of Ecuador (1979–2009).” Politics & Policy 40, no. 2: 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00348.x.

Nohlen, D. 2009. “Constitutional Jurisdiction and the Consolidation of Democracy.” Politics & Policy 37, no. 1: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2008.00159.x.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多民族下一国?在厄瓜多尔和玻利维亚建立多民族国家的挑战(2007-2018)
当国家承认在单一国家的背景下存在多个“真正的”民族或“普韦布洛人”时,会发生什么?在一个多民族的国家,一个多民族的国家,一个领导人如何在尊重文化多样性和促进经济增长之间做出选择?这篇文章分析了厄瓜多尔和玻利维亚这两个在宪法上宣布自己是多民族国家的国家,认为根据每个统治者的支持者基础的构成,总统将选择优先考虑一组目标而不是另一组目标。一方面,拉斐尔·科雷亚能够以文化政策为代价,优先考虑厄瓜多尔的经济政策,因此失去了土著的支持。另一方面,虽然玻利维亚总统埃沃·莫拉莱斯(Evo Morales)最初支持文化政策,但土著社区后来批评他支持越来越多的采掘项目。这篇文章对在本土动员增加的背景下研究国家和民族具有重要意义;它突出了在经济福利、环境保护和社会包容方面平衡政策决策的困难。相关文章阿吉拉。阿吉拉。“法院和拉丁美洲司法对民主的侵蚀。”政治,51号政策,不。1: 7-25。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12516。Basabe-Serrano, S. 2012。“总统权力和政治司法化作为司法制度变革的决定因素:厄瓜多尔最高法院(1979-2009)”。政治,政策40,不。2: 339 - 361。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00348.x。Nohlen博士,2009。“宪法管辖权与巩固民主”。政治,政策37,不。1: 3-30。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2008.00159.x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Note From the Editor and Call for Papers: Policy Studies Yearbook Annual Review 2025–26 Shaping Institutions: Exploring the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Institutional Change in Sub-Saharan Africa Whose Voices Are Heard? Parliamentary Committee Witnesses as Gendered Representatives Special Issue: Personalism and Good Governance—Notes on Contributors Illusions of Control: Authoritarian Learning and the Geopolitics of Technocratic Tyranny
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1