Time-dependent changes in the early salivary proteome after oral stimulation with wine differs by the individual 6-n-propylthiouracil (prop) taster status†
Rafael I. Velázquez-Martínez, Carolina Muñoz-González, Anabel Marina-Ramírez and María Ángeles Pozo-Bayón
{"title":"Time-dependent changes in the early salivary proteome after oral stimulation with wine differs by the individual 6-n-propylthiouracil (prop) taster status†","authors":"Rafael I. Velázquez-Martínez, Carolina Muñoz-González, Anabel Marina-Ramírez and María Ángeles Pozo-Bayón","doi":"10.1039/D4FO05082G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Differences in the oral responsiveness to the bitter compound 6-<em>n</em>-propylthiouracil (PROP) between taster (T) and non-taster (NT) individuals have also been related to differences in the long-lasting wine astringency perception, which could be linked to differences in the dynamics of the salivary protein profile upon wine stimulation, depending on the individual PROP taste status (PTS). To check this, the time-course changes in the early protein salivary profile (30 and 60 seconds) after the oral stimulation with a red wine (CRW) and with the same tannin-enriched wine (TRW) in Ts and NTs (young women) were tested by using an untargeted proteomic approach. Results showed that Ts exhibited more pronounced protein changes (measured as the ratio of protein abundance before and after wine stimulation), compared to NTs, including proteins such as cystatins (SN, S, SA and D), α-amylase, prolactin (PIP), carbonic anhydrase VI (CA-VI) and acid proline-rich proteins (aPRP). These changes were more evident in 30 s (<em>t</em>1) than 60 s (<em>t</em>2) after the oral exposure to the wine and they were of higher magnitude after the exposure to TRW. These results suggest that differences in the salivary proteome profile induced by the oral stimulation with wine depending on PTS might contribute to explain individual variations in wine astringency perception over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" 6","pages":" 2598-2610"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fo/d4fo05082g?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fo/d4fo05082g","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Differences in the oral responsiveness to the bitter compound 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) between taster (T) and non-taster (NT) individuals have also been related to differences in the long-lasting wine astringency perception, which could be linked to differences in the dynamics of the salivary protein profile upon wine stimulation, depending on the individual PROP taste status (PTS). To check this, the time-course changes in the early protein salivary profile (30 and 60 seconds) after the oral stimulation with a red wine (CRW) and with the same tannin-enriched wine (TRW) in Ts and NTs (young women) were tested by using an untargeted proteomic approach. Results showed that Ts exhibited more pronounced protein changes (measured as the ratio of protein abundance before and after wine stimulation), compared to NTs, including proteins such as cystatins (SN, S, SA and D), α-amylase, prolactin (PIP), carbonic anhydrase VI (CA-VI) and acid proline-rich proteins (aPRP). These changes were more evident in 30 s (t1) than 60 s (t2) after the oral exposure to the wine and they were of higher magnitude after the exposure to TRW. These results suggest that differences in the salivary proteome profile induced by the oral stimulation with wine depending on PTS might contribute to explain individual variations in wine astringency perception over time.
味觉者(T)和非味觉者(NT)对苦味化合物6-n-丙基硫尿嘧啶(PROP)的口腔反应性差异也与葡萄酒持久涩味感知的差异有关,这可能与葡萄酒刺激下唾液蛋白谱的动态差异有关,这取决于个体PROP味觉状态(PTS)。为了验证这一点,使用非靶向蛋白质组学方法测试了Ts和nt(年轻女性)在口服红酒(CRW)和同样富含单宁的红酒(TRW)刺激后早期唾液蛋白谱(30秒和60秒)的时间变化。结果表明,与nt相比,Ts表现出更明显的蛋白质变化(以葡萄酒刺激前后蛋白质丰度之比衡量),包括胱抑素(SN、S、SA和D)、α-淀粉酶、催乳素(PIP)、碳酸酐酶VI (CA-VI)和富含脯氨酸的酸蛋白(aPRP)等蛋白质。这些变化在口服葡萄酒后30 s (t1)比60 s (t2)更明显,并且在TRW暴露后更大。这些结果表明,口腔酒刺激引起的唾液蛋白质组谱的差异取决于PTS,这可能有助于解释葡萄酒涩味感知随时间的个体差异。
期刊介绍:
Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.