{"title":"Travel contexts for different forms of multimodality in the new urban mobility landscape: a latent class analysis","authors":"Xingxing Fu, Dea van Lierop, Dick Ettema","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10596-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multimodality has been recognised as a sustainable way of travel, triggering transport policies to seek solutions that facilitate multimodality. However, although emerging mobility services and transport options in the new urban mobility landscape unlock new possibilities for multimodality, little is known about their roles in different forms of multimodal travel. Therefore, this study investigated the forms of multimodality and their relationship with individual travel contexts considering new trends in the urban mobility sector. In the identification of modality styles, a broader and more detailed set of transport modes was considered; and in the definition of individual travel contexts, a series of factors related to the availability and accessibility of transport options and mobility services were considered. Using latent class analysis, this study identified five modality styles including three forms of multimodality that have not been found in previous research. Distinct forms of public transport (bus, tram, metro, and train) were found to be used in conjunction with other transport modes in different ways, leading to different forms of multimodality. Mopeds and motorcycles, rarely considered in previous research, were found to be the primary travel mode for a small group of people. In addition, weighted multinomial logit regression was used to assess the association between individual travel contexts and modality styles. The results indicate that new mobility services, such as (e-)bike-sharing, have the potential to promote more sustainable forms of multimodality that combine active modes with public transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10596-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multimodality has been recognised as a sustainable way of travel, triggering transport policies to seek solutions that facilitate multimodality. However, although emerging mobility services and transport options in the new urban mobility landscape unlock new possibilities for multimodality, little is known about their roles in different forms of multimodal travel. Therefore, this study investigated the forms of multimodality and their relationship with individual travel contexts considering new trends in the urban mobility sector. In the identification of modality styles, a broader and more detailed set of transport modes was considered; and in the definition of individual travel contexts, a series of factors related to the availability and accessibility of transport options and mobility services were considered. Using latent class analysis, this study identified five modality styles including three forms of multimodality that have not been found in previous research. Distinct forms of public transport (bus, tram, metro, and train) were found to be used in conjunction with other transport modes in different ways, leading to different forms of multimodality. Mopeds and motorcycles, rarely considered in previous research, were found to be the primary travel mode for a small group of people. In addition, weighted multinomial logit regression was used to assess the association between individual travel contexts and modality styles. The results indicate that new mobility services, such as (e-)bike-sharing, have the potential to promote more sustainable forms of multimodality that combine active modes with public transport.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.