Travel contexts for different forms of multimodality in the new urban mobility landscape: a latent class analysis

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s11116-025-10596-8
Xingxing Fu, Dea van Lierop, Dick Ettema
{"title":"Travel contexts for different forms of multimodality in the new urban mobility landscape: a latent class analysis","authors":"Xingxing Fu, Dea van Lierop, Dick Ettema","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10596-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multimodality has been recognised as a sustainable way of travel, triggering transport policies to seek solutions that facilitate multimodality. However, although emerging mobility services and transport options in the new urban mobility landscape unlock new possibilities for multimodality, little is known about their roles in different forms of multimodal travel. Therefore, this study investigated the forms of multimodality and their relationship with individual travel contexts considering new trends in the urban mobility sector. In the identification of modality styles, a broader and more detailed set of transport modes was considered; and in the definition of individual travel contexts, a series of factors related to the availability and accessibility of transport options and mobility services were considered. Using latent class analysis, this study identified five modality styles including three forms of multimodality that have not been found in previous research. Distinct forms of public transport (bus, tram, metro, and train) were found to be used in conjunction with other transport modes in different ways, leading to different forms of multimodality. Mopeds and motorcycles, rarely considered in previous research, were found to be the primary travel mode for a small group of people. In addition, weighted multinomial logit regression was used to assess the association between individual travel contexts and modality styles. The results indicate that new mobility services, such as (e-)bike-sharing, have the potential to promote more sustainable forms of multimodality that combine active modes with public transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10596-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multimodality has been recognised as a sustainable way of travel, triggering transport policies to seek solutions that facilitate multimodality. However, although emerging mobility services and transport options in the new urban mobility landscape unlock new possibilities for multimodality, little is known about their roles in different forms of multimodal travel. Therefore, this study investigated the forms of multimodality and their relationship with individual travel contexts considering new trends in the urban mobility sector. In the identification of modality styles, a broader and more detailed set of transport modes was considered; and in the definition of individual travel contexts, a series of factors related to the availability and accessibility of transport options and mobility services were considered. Using latent class analysis, this study identified five modality styles including three forms of multimodality that have not been found in previous research. Distinct forms of public transport (bus, tram, metro, and train) were found to be used in conjunction with other transport modes in different ways, leading to different forms of multimodality. Mopeds and motorcycles, rarely considered in previous research, were found to be the primary travel mode for a small group of people. In addition, weighted multinomial logit regression was used to assess the association between individual travel contexts and modality styles. The results indicate that new mobility services, such as (e-)bike-sharing, have the potential to promote more sustainable forms of multimodality that combine active modes with public transport.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新城市交通景观中不同形式的多模态交通环境:潜在阶层分析
多式联运已被认为是一种可持续的旅行方式,促使交通政策寻求促进多式联运的解决方案。然而,尽管在新的城市交通格局中,新兴的交通服务和交通选择为多式联运提供了新的可能性,但人们对它们在不同形式的多式联运中所起的作用知之甚少。因此,考虑到城市交通领域的新趋势,本研究调查了多式联运的形式及其与个人出行环境的关系。在模式风格的识别中,考虑了更广泛和更详细的运输模式集;在个人旅行环境的定义中,考虑了一系列与交通选择和流动服务的可用性和可及性有关的因素。利用潜在类分析,本研究确定了五种情态风格,其中包括三种在以往研究中未发现的多情态形式。不同形式的公共交通(公共汽车,有轨电车,地铁和火车)被发现以不同的方式与其他交通方式结合使用,导致不同形式的多式联运。在之前的研究中很少考虑到的轻便摩托车和摩托车,被发现是一小部分人的主要出行方式。此外,采用加权多项式logistic回归分析了个体旅行环境与形态风格之间的关系。研究结果表明,新的交通服务,如(电动)共享自行车,有可能促进更可持续的多式联运形式,将主动模式与公共交通相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the key drivers of travel demand via hotspot analysis: a new approach to mitigate the modifiable areal unit problem Understanding mode choice in integrated shared mobility systems with experience-related variables generated from navigation big data What determines low-carbon travel? A policy-oriented assessment using PLS-SEM and NCA in an extended TPB framework School commute shapes sustainable transportation across generations How vehicle design, infrastructure conditions, and ableism create barriers to travel for people with disabilities: a mixed method study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1