Zhuhong Wang, Hang Zhou, Yunzhou Li, Zengliang Wang
{"title":"Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow Impact on Pier With Different Cross‐Sectional Shapes Based on Coupled CFD‐DEM","authors":"Zhuhong Wang, Hang Zhou, Yunzhou Li, Zengliang Wang","doi":"10.1002/nag.3971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concrete piers located in steep mountainous regions are highly susceptible to damage from debris flows. Existing studies often oversimplify debris flows as particle flows or equivalent fluids, neglecting their multiphase characteristics. In this paper, a three‐dimensional numerical model of debris flow‐bridge piers interaction is established based on the coupled CFD‐DEM approach. The Hertz–Mindlin (no‐slip) model and the Navier–Stokes equations are employed to describe the behavior of particle contacts and the fluid phase, respectively. An interface program compiled using user‐defined functions (UDFs) facilitates the transfer of information (drag, buoyancy, and viscous forces) between the fluid and particles. The accuracy of the model is validated by the simulation results of single‐particle settlement and underwater granular collapse. This study conducts a detailed investigation into the interaction mechanisms between the debris flow—bridge piers, considering the cross‐sectional shape of the piers and the solid volume fraction. It has been discovered that the shape of the bridge piers significantly influences the behavior of debris flows and the separation points. A power function effectively describes the relationship between the solid volume fraction and the peak impact force coefficient, <jats:italic>C</jats:italic><jats:sub>d</jats:sub>. Simplifying debris flows to dry granular flows or equivalent fluids may lead to an underestimation of the impact pressure.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Concrete piers located in steep mountainous regions are highly susceptible to damage from debris flows. Existing studies often oversimplify debris flows as particle flows or equivalent fluids, neglecting their multiphase characteristics. In this paper, a three‐dimensional numerical model of debris flow‐bridge piers interaction is established based on the coupled CFD‐DEM approach. The Hertz–Mindlin (no‐slip) model and the Navier–Stokes equations are employed to describe the behavior of particle contacts and the fluid phase, respectively. An interface program compiled using user‐defined functions (UDFs) facilitates the transfer of information (drag, buoyancy, and viscous forces) between the fluid and particles. The accuracy of the model is validated by the simulation results of single‐particle settlement and underwater granular collapse. This study conducts a detailed investigation into the interaction mechanisms between the debris flow—bridge piers, considering the cross‐sectional shape of the piers and the solid volume fraction. It has been discovered that the shape of the bridge piers significantly influences the behavior of debris flows and the separation points. A power function effectively describes the relationship between the solid volume fraction and the peak impact force coefficient, Cd. Simplifying debris flows to dry granular flows or equivalent fluids may lead to an underestimation of the impact pressure.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.