Arjun Verma BS , Saad Mallick MD , Justin J. Kim BA , Joseph Hadaya MD, PhD , Yas Sanaiha MD , Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH , Peyman Benharash MD, MS
{"title":"The impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue","authors":"Arjun Verma BS , Saad Mallick MD , Justin J. Kim BA , Joseph Hadaya MD, PhD , Yas Sanaiha MD , Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH , Peyman Benharash MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Failure to rescue has been increasingly used as a surgical quality metric, although implementation with complication-agnostic risk models may disproportionately penalize centers that care for high-risk patients. We used a nationally representative database to assess the impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic/mitral valve replacement, or esophageal/pancreatic/large bowel resection were identified within the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Two hierarchical logistic regressions (model 1: complication-agnostic; model 2: complication-sensitive) were developed to evaluate risk-adjusted rates of failure to rescue at each center. Patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities) were incorporated as fixed effects in both models. Model 2 also included adjustment for the occurrence and identity of each complication. Hospitals were subsequently grouped into quintiles of failure to rescue using each model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately 296,907 patients at 1,034 hospitals met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality, complication, and failure to rescue rates were 1.1%, 4.8%, and 17.8%, respectively. Centers in the highest quintile of failure to rescue for model 1 more frequently managed patients who developed cardiac arrest (0.9 vs 0.7%, <em>P</em> = .003) or acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (0.6 vs 0.4%, <em>P</em> = .017). In contrast, the rates of all complications except sepsis (2.7 vs 2.3%, <em>P</em> = .035) were comparable between centers in the top quintile and others, when using model 2. Overall, ∼30% of hospitals were reclassified into different quintiles with the complication-sensitive model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that complication-agnostic models disproportionately penalize centers caring for patients who develop severe complications, which can be mitigated with complication-sensitive models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 109323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025001758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Failure to rescue has been increasingly used as a surgical quality metric, although implementation with complication-agnostic risk models may disproportionately penalize centers that care for high-risk patients. We used a nationally representative database to assess the impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue.
Methods
All adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic/mitral valve replacement, or esophageal/pancreatic/large bowel resection were identified within the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Two hierarchical logistic regressions (model 1: complication-agnostic; model 2: complication-sensitive) were developed to evaluate risk-adjusted rates of failure to rescue at each center. Patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities) were incorporated as fixed effects in both models. Model 2 also included adjustment for the occurrence and identity of each complication. Hospitals were subsequently grouped into quintiles of failure to rescue using each model.
Results
Approximately 296,907 patients at 1,034 hospitals met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality, complication, and failure to rescue rates were 1.1%, 4.8%, and 17.8%, respectively. Centers in the highest quintile of failure to rescue for model 1 more frequently managed patients who developed cardiac arrest (0.9 vs 0.7%, P = .003) or acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (0.6 vs 0.4%, P = .017). In contrast, the rates of all complications except sepsis (2.7 vs 2.3%, P = .035) were comparable between centers in the top quintile and others, when using model 2. Overall, ∼30% of hospitals were reclassified into different quintiles with the complication-sensitive model.
Conclusion
This study suggests that complication-agnostic models disproportionately penalize centers caring for patients who develop severe complications, which can be mitigated with complication-sensitive models.
期刊介绍:
For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.