The impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109323
Arjun Verma BS , Saad Mallick MD , Justin J. Kim BA , Joseph Hadaya MD, PhD , Yas Sanaiha MD , Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH , Peyman Benharash MD, MS
{"title":"The impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue","authors":"Arjun Verma BS ,&nbsp;Saad Mallick MD ,&nbsp;Justin J. Kim BA ,&nbsp;Joseph Hadaya MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yas Sanaiha MD ,&nbsp;Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Failure to rescue has been increasingly used as a surgical quality metric, although implementation with complication-agnostic risk models may disproportionately penalize centers that care for high-risk patients. We used a nationally representative database to assess the impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic/mitral valve replacement, or esophageal/pancreatic/large bowel resection were identified within the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Two hierarchical logistic regressions (model 1: complication-agnostic; model 2: complication-sensitive) were developed to evaluate risk-adjusted rates of failure to rescue at each center. Patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities) were incorporated as fixed effects in both models. Model 2 also included adjustment for the occurrence and identity of each complication. Hospitals were subsequently grouped into quintiles of failure to rescue using each model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately 296,907 patients at 1,034 hospitals met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality, complication, and failure to rescue rates were 1.1%, 4.8%, and 17.8%, respectively. Centers in the highest quintile of failure to rescue for model 1 more frequently managed patients who developed cardiac arrest (0.9 vs 0.7%, <em>P</em> = .003) or acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (0.6 vs 0.4%, <em>P</em> = .017). In contrast, the rates of all complications except sepsis (2.7 vs 2.3%, <em>P</em> = .035) were comparable between centers in the top quintile and others, when using model 2. Overall, ∼30% of hospitals were reclassified into different quintiles with the complication-sensitive model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that complication-agnostic models disproportionately penalize centers caring for patients who develop severe complications, which can be mitigated with complication-sensitive models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 109323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025001758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Failure to rescue has been increasingly used as a surgical quality metric, although implementation with complication-agnostic risk models may disproportionately penalize centers that care for high-risk patients. We used a nationally representative database to assess the impact of complication-sensitive risk models on hospital benchmarking for failure to rescue.

Methods

All adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic/mitral valve replacement, or esophageal/pancreatic/large bowel resection were identified within the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Two hierarchical logistic regressions (model 1: complication-agnostic; model 2: complication-sensitive) were developed to evaluate risk-adjusted rates of failure to rescue at each center. Patient characteristics (demographics, comorbidities) were incorporated as fixed effects in both models. Model 2 also included adjustment for the occurrence and identity of each complication. Hospitals were subsequently grouped into quintiles of failure to rescue using each model.

Results

Approximately 296,907 patients at 1,034 hospitals met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality, complication, and failure to rescue rates were 1.1%, 4.8%, and 17.8%, respectively. Centers in the highest quintile of failure to rescue for model 1 more frequently managed patients who developed cardiac arrest (0.9 vs 0.7%, P = .003) or acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (0.6 vs 0.4%, P = .017). In contrast, the rates of all complications except sepsis (2.7 vs 2.3%, P = .035) were comparable between centers in the top quintile and others, when using model 2. Overall, ∼30% of hospitals were reclassified into different quintiles with the complication-sensitive model.

Conclusion

This study suggests that complication-agnostic models disproportionately penalize centers caring for patients who develop severe complications, which can be mitigated with complication-sensitive models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并发症敏感风险模型对医院抢救失败基准的影响
背景:抢救失败已越来越多地被用作外科手术质量的衡量标准,尽管采用并发症未知风险模型可能会不成比例地惩罚照顾高危患者的中心。我们使用一个具有全国代表性的数据库来评估并发症敏感风险模型对医院抢救失败基准的影响。方法:所有接受择期冠状动脉旁路移植术、主动脉瓣/二尖瓣置换术或食管/胰腺/大肠切除术的成年人都在2019年全国再入院数据库中被确定。两个层次逻辑回归(模型1:并发症不可知;模型2:并发症敏感)用于评估每个中心的风险调整抢救失败率。在两个模型中,患者特征(人口统计学、合并症)被纳入固定效应。模型2还包括对每种并发症的发生和身份的调整。随后,使用每种模型将医院分为抢救失败的五分之一。结果1034家医院约296907例患者符合纳入标准。总死亡率、并发症和抢救失败率分别为1.1%、4.8%和17.8%。模型1抢救失败的最高五分位数中心更频繁地管理发生心脏骤停(0.9 vs 0.7%, P = 0.003)或需要透析的急性肾损伤(0.6 vs 0.4%, P = 0.017)的患者。相比之下,当使用模型2时,除败血症外的所有并发症的发生率(2.7 vs 2.3%, P = 0.035)在前五分之一的中心和其他中心之间具有可比性。总体而言,约30%的医院根据并发症敏感模型被重新分类为不同的五分位数。结论该研究表明,并发症不可知模型不成比例地惩罚了照顾出现严重并发症患者的中心,而并发症敏感模型可以减轻这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Watch and Wait in practice: Adherence to surveillance after nonoperative management for rectal cancer Clinical implications of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in surgically treated primary aldosteronism Postoperative risk stratification using calcitonin doubling rate in medullary thyroid carcinoma with biochemical persistent disease Hospital price markup patterns and outcomes after major surgery: A retrospective observational study of the National Inpatient Sample 2016–2019 Evaluating the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy and extent of axillary surgery in cancer patients with 1–2 positive lymph nodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1