Partisan energy preferences in the United States: Republicans prioritize price, Democrats also consider renewables

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103997
Victor Y. Wu
{"title":"Partisan energy preferences in the United States: Republicans prioritize price, Democrats also consider renewables","authors":"Victor Y. Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How does partisanship affect energy preferences in the United States? Using a nationally representative conjoint experiment (n = 1,862) to simulate Americans’ energy mix choices from investor-owned utilities and Community Choice Aggregations, this study analyzes the relative salience of price, percentage of renewables, and local renewable energy sourcing. The conjoint experiment reveals that Republicans’ and independents’ choice of energy mix is mostly determined by the monthly electricity bill, whereas Democrats’ choice of energy mix is determined equally by the monthly electricity bill and by the percentage of renewables. Thus, communicating financial incentives and cost savings is crucial for promoting renewable energy adoption among Republicans and independents. These findings contribute to the literature on partisan attitudes towards renewable energy and reaffirm the need for tailored communication strategies in an era of increasing partisan polarization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103997"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does partisanship affect energy preferences in the United States? Using a nationally representative conjoint experiment (n = 1,862) to simulate Americans’ energy mix choices from investor-owned utilities and Community Choice Aggregations, this study analyzes the relative salience of price, percentage of renewables, and local renewable energy sourcing. The conjoint experiment reveals that Republicans’ and independents’ choice of energy mix is mostly determined by the monthly electricity bill, whereas Democrats’ choice of energy mix is determined equally by the monthly electricity bill and by the percentage of renewables. Thus, communicating financial incentives and cost savings is crucial for promoting renewable energy adoption among Republicans and independents. These findings contribute to the literature on partisan attitudes towards renewable energy and reaffirm the need for tailored communication strategies in an era of increasing partisan polarization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network Community energy justice: A review of origins, convergence, and a research agenda Beyond extractivist logic? Contested dynamics of lithium frontier expansion in Chile Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1