Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104038
Nicolas Graham
{"title":"Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network","authors":"Nicolas Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green growth is a leading framework and project for addressing climate change. While social science research has challenged the possibility of green growth and the proposed means of achieving it, less work has examined the actors and business sectors that define, support and mobilize the project in different regions. Employing a neoGramscian lens and using tools of social network analysis and content analysis, this paper maps a green growth policy-planning network in Canada and considers its potential to support energy transition. It finds that while a tightly knit coalition has formed in support of green growth, fossil fuel firms and banks that heavily fund fossil fuel projects are central in the network. Consistent with ties to carbon firms, central policy organizations advance solutions that sustain the viability of the fossil fuel sector, as they emphasize the merits of reducing production emissions from fossil fuels, while avoiding or opposing policy to phase out the industry. The findings indicate a network that accommodates pressures for decarbonization while delaying energy transition. The Canadian case highlights the failure of green growth to challenge fossil fuel incumbents and vested interests, pointing to a key limitation of the project, especially in fossil fuel producing regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104038"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green growth is a leading framework and project for addressing climate change. While social science research has challenged the possibility of green growth and the proposed means of achieving it, less work has examined the actors and business sectors that define, support and mobilize the project in different regions. Employing a neoGramscian lens and using tools of social network analysis and content analysis, this paper maps a green growth policy-planning network in Canada and considers its potential to support energy transition. It finds that while a tightly knit coalition has formed in support of green growth, fossil fuel firms and banks that heavily fund fossil fuel projects are central in the network. Consistent with ties to carbon firms, central policy organizations advance solutions that sustain the viability of the fossil fuel sector, as they emphasize the merits of reducing production emissions from fossil fuels, while avoiding or opposing policy to phase out the industry. The findings indicate a network that accommodates pressures for decarbonization while delaying energy transition. The Canadian case highlights the failure of green growth to challenge fossil fuel incumbents and vested interests, pointing to a key limitation of the project, especially in fossil fuel producing regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色增长是应对气候变化的一个主要框架和项目。尽管社会科学研究对绿色增长的可能性以及实现绿色增长的拟议手段提出了质疑,但对不同地区定义、支持和动员该项目的参与者和商业部门进行研究的工作却较少。本文从新葛兰素史克视角出发,利用社会网络分析和内容分析工具,描绘了加拿大的绿色增长政策规划网络,并探讨了其支持能源转型的潜力。本文发现,虽然支持绿色增长的紧密联盟已经形成,但化石燃料公司和为化石燃料项目提供大量资金的银行在该网络中占据核心地位。与碳企业的联系相一致,中央政策组织推进维持化石燃料行业活力的解决方案,因为他们强调减少化石燃料生产排放的好处,同时避免或反对逐步淘汰该行业的政策。研究结果表明,这一网络在承受去碳化压力的同时,也推迟了能源转型。加拿大的案例凸显了绿色增长在挑战化石燃料现有企业和既得利益方面的失败,指出了该项目的主要局限性,尤其是在化石燃料生产地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network Community energy justice: A review of origins, convergence, and a research agenda Beyond extractivist logic? Contested dynamics of lithium frontier expansion in Chile Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1