Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104031
Niklas Kreander , Ken McPhail , Frank W. Geels
{"title":"Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe","authors":"Niklas Kreander ,&nbsp;Ken McPhail ,&nbsp;Frank W. Geels","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since low-carbon transitions require significant reorientations of financial flows, there is increasing interest in institutional investors (such as pension funds and insurance companies), which are seen as potential providers of long-term ‘patient capital’. While previous research has addressed topics like divestment from fossil fuels, investment in renewable energy, and barriers to change, there are calls in the literature for more integrated analyses. Responding to these calls, this paper analyses the multiple low-carbon reorientation strategies of seven leading institutional investors in Norway, Sweden, and the UK from 2012 to 2021. Using the Multi-Level Perspective to frame the research and understanding finance as a separate regime, we conceptualize low-carbon reorientation as involving a shift in institutional investments from fossil fuel regimes towards green niche-innovations. Drawing on fund analysis, interviews, and document analysis, the analysis consequently focuses on three strategies with the following findings: 1) funds are divesting from coal but holding on to oil companies, 2) investments in renewable energy firms increased significantly in recent years, 3) several funds also increased their direct investments in renewable energy projects, which is a novel finding. We conclude that leading institutional investors are reorienting in low-carbon directions, but that several financial regime rules (like prescribed capital allocation requirements and stock market indices) lead to continued oil lock-ins. Extending previous analyses of institutional investors with more recent data of lead firms, the paper thus finds more engagement with some dimensions of low-carbon transitions but also ongoing path dependence in others.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104031"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since low-carbon transitions require significant reorientations of financial flows, there is increasing interest in institutional investors (such as pension funds and insurance companies), which are seen as potential providers of long-term ‘patient capital’. While previous research has addressed topics like divestment from fossil fuels, investment in renewable energy, and barriers to change, there are calls in the literature for more integrated analyses. Responding to these calls, this paper analyses the multiple low-carbon reorientation strategies of seven leading institutional investors in Norway, Sweden, and the UK from 2012 to 2021. Using the Multi-Level Perspective to frame the research and understanding finance as a separate regime, we conceptualize low-carbon reorientation as involving a shift in institutional investments from fossil fuel regimes towards green niche-innovations. Drawing on fund analysis, interviews, and document analysis, the analysis consequently focuses on three strategies with the following findings: 1) funds are divesting from coal but holding on to oil companies, 2) investments in renewable energy firms increased significantly in recent years, 3) several funds also increased their direct investments in renewable energy projects, which is a novel finding. We conclude that leading institutional investors are reorienting in low-carbon directions, but that several financial regime rules (like prescribed capital allocation requirements and stock market indices) lead to continued oil lock-ins. Extending previous analyses of institutional investors with more recent data of lead firms, the paper thus finds more engagement with some dimensions of low-carbon transitions but also ongoing path dependence in others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network Community energy justice: A review of origins, convergence, and a research agenda Beyond extractivist logic? Contested dynamics of lithium frontier expansion in Chile Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1