Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104030
Maria Pfeiffer , Marco Sonnberger
{"title":"Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany","authors":"Maria Pfeiffer ,&nbsp;Marco Sonnberger","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Germany plans to increase support for community energy projects as part of its renewable energy expansion. These are not only intended to increase local acceptance but are also seen as a socially fairer and more democratically participatory alternative to renewable energy projects developed and owned by large energy companies. However, based on semi-structured interviews with experts and developers in the field of citizen wind energy, we show that issues of procedural and distributive justice are already being decided in the process of securing land through an ongoing land rush for wind sites. Although there are some mediating factors, such as social pressure and parcel size, landowners can act as veto players for local wind energy projects, excluding non-owners of land property, such as citizens and municipalities, from the decision-making process. Based on our empirical findings we argue that the distribution of landownership is crucial for questions of local energy justice and that more attention should be paid to the relevance of landownership in the context of energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104030"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Germany plans to increase support for community energy projects as part of its renewable energy expansion. These are not only intended to increase local acceptance but are also seen as a socially fairer and more democratically participatory alternative to renewable energy projects developed and owned by large energy companies. However, based on semi-structured interviews with experts and developers in the field of citizen wind energy, we show that issues of procedural and distributive justice are already being decided in the process of securing land through an ongoing land rush for wind sites. Although there are some mediating factors, such as social pressure and parcel size, landowners can act as veto players for local wind energy projects, excluding non-owners of land property, such as citizens and municipalities, from the decision-making process. Based on our empirical findings we argue that the distribution of landownership is crucial for questions of local energy justice and that more attention should be paid to the relevance of landownership in the context of energy transitions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国计划增加对社区能源项目的支持,作为其可再生能源扩张的一部分。这些项目不仅是为了提高当地的接受度,而且也被视为一种更公平、更具民主参与性的社会选择,可以替代由大型能源公司开发和拥有的可再生能源项目。然而,根据对公民风能领域的专家和开发商进行的半结构式访谈,我们发现,在持续的风能用地抢夺中,程序和分配正义问题已经在确保土地安全的过程中被决定了。虽然存在一些中介因素,如社会压力和地块大小,但土地所有者可以充当地方风能项目的否决者,将非土地财产所有者(如公民和市政当局)排除在决策过程之外。根据我们的实证研究结果,我们认为土地所有权的分配对于地方能源公正问题至关重要,在能源转型的背景下,应更多地关注土地所有权的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Rushing for the gold of the energy transition: An empirical exploration of the relevance of landownership for the wind energy expansion in Germany Green dreams or fossil schemes? Mapping Canada's green growth policy-planning network Community energy justice: A review of origins, convergence, and a research agenda Beyond extractivist logic? Contested dynamics of lithium frontier expansion in Chile Institutional investors and low-carbon transitions: A multi-level analysis of lead firm reorientation in northern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1