Development of sequential winning-percentage prediction model for badminton competitions: applying the expert system sequential probability ratio test.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s13102-025-01078-6
Eunhye Jo
{"title":"Development of sequential winning-percentage prediction model for badminton competitions: applying the expert system sequential probability ratio test.","authors":"Eunhye Jo","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01078-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study developed a sequential winning-percentage prediction model for badminton competitions using the expert system sequential probability ratio test (EXSPRT), aiming to calculate the difficulty of each event within a match and establish the initial prior probability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from 100 men's singles matches (222 games) held by the Badminton World Federation (BWF) in 2018 to evaluate event difficulty across six models for each determining factor. For setting the initial prior probability calculation method, 30 men's singles matches (74 games) organized by the BWF in 2019 were randomly selected. The odds for these matches were obtained from www.oddsportal.com .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficacy of the six models was assessed based on application rates (15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of the collected odds, with the initial prior probability reflecting 25% of the odds chosen owing to its superior validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research yielded six sequential winning percentage prediction models capable of offering real-time predictions during matches in badminton competitions by leveraging EXSPRT. These models enhance spectator engagement and provide foundational data for developing similar prediction models for other sports. Future research should focus on developing a program to identify the most effective model among the six and implement it practically.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01078-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study developed a sequential winning-percentage prediction model for badminton competitions using the expert system sequential probability ratio test (EXSPRT), aiming to calculate the difficulty of each event within a match and establish the initial prior probability.

Methods: We utilized data from 100 men's singles matches (222 games) held by the Badminton World Federation (BWF) in 2018 to evaluate event difficulty across six models for each determining factor. For setting the initial prior probability calculation method, 30 men's singles matches (74 games) organized by the BWF in 2019 were randomly selected. The odds for these matches were obtained from www.oddsportal.com .

Results: The efficacy of the six models was assessed based on application rates (15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of the collected odds, with the initial prior probability reflecting 25% of the odds chosen owing to its superior validity.

Conclusions: This research yielded six sequential winning percentage prediction models capable of offering real-time predictions during matches in badminton competitions by leveraging EXSPRT. These models enhance spectator engagement and provide foundational data for developing similar prediction models for other sports. Future research should focus on developing a program to identify the most effective model among the six and implement it practically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羽毛球比赛序贯胜率预测模型的建立:应用专家系统序贯概率比检验。
背景:本研究利用专家系统序贯概率比检验(EXSPRT)建立羽毛球比赛序贯胜率预测模型,旨在计算一场比赛中各项目的难度,建立初始先验概率。方法:利用2018年世界羽联(BWF)举办的100场男单比赛(222场)的数据,对每个决定因素的6个模型进行项目难度评估。为设置初始先验概率计算方法,随机选取2019年世界羽联举办的30场男单比赛(74场)。结果:根据所收集的概率的应用率(15%,20%,25%和30%)评估六种模型的有效性,由于其优越的有效性,初始先验概率反映了选择的概率的25%。结论:本研究利用EXSPRT获得了六个连续的胜率预测模型,能够在羽毛球比赛中提供实时预测。这些模型提高了观众的参与度,并为开发其他体育项目的类似预测模型提供了基础数据。未来的研究应侧重于制定一项计划,以确定六种模式中最有效的模式并在实践中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Plantarflexion and frontal-plane strength predict dynamic balance in youth athletes: a cross-sectional study. Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the smith-machine squat exercise. Comparative analysis of body composition and pulmonary function in elite male deaf endurance athletes - track and field and road cycling. The effects of 12 weeks of Stroboscopic Visual Training (SVT) combined with agility training on the balance and change of direction performance in college-aged female soccer players. The effect of neurofeedback and EMG biofeedback on gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and peroneus longus time to peak EMG in elite athletes with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1