Preliminary study on determining the optimal position of region of interest for evaluating hepatic steatosis using ultrasound Attenuation imaging

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04876-1
Mingsen Bi, Fangyi Liu, Jie Yu, Yun He, Ping Liang, Hong Yang
{"title":"Preliminary study on determining the optimal position of region of interest for evaluating hepatic steatosis using ultrasound Attenuation imaging","authors":"Mingsen Bi,&nbsp;Fangyi Liu,&nbsp;Jie Yu,&nbsp;Yun He,&nbsp;Ping Liang,&nbsp;Hong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04876-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To find the optimal position of region of interest (ROI) for evaluating hepatic steatosis using attenuation imaging (ATI) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively enrolled 143 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy for the evaluation of MAFLD between October 2020 and October 2022. All ATI measurements were performed by the same radiologist. The ATI-ROI was placed at four different positions using a specialized workstation: the top edge of the sampling box (P1), the lower edge of the dark orange region (P2), 0.5 cm and 1 cm below the lower edge of the dark orange region (P3 and P4). Multivariate linear regression analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis were performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The AUCs of ATI at the four different ATI-ROI positions were 0.472 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.362–0.581), 0.693(0.611–0.768), 0.757(0.611–0.768), and 0.809 (0.735–0.870) for ≥ S1; 0.544 (0.459–0.628), 0.779 (0.702–0.844), 0.842 (0.772–0.898), and 0.865 (0.798–0.916) for ≥ S2; and 0.655 (0.571–0.733), 0.904 (0.843–0.947), 0.95 (0.9–0.979), and 0.949 (0.9–0.979) for S3, respectively. The factor that most significantly affected ATI was steatosis grade(<i>P</i>&lt;0.001), when ATI-ROI was placed at the position of P2, P3, and P4.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hepatic steatosis grade was the most significant determinant factor for ATI value at multivariate analysis. When clinicians conduct ATI measurement, the dark orange region indicating the area of reverberation artifact should be avoided, and placing the ATI-ROI 1 cm below the lower edge of the dark orange region may be a better choice.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4380 - 4388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04876-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To find the optimal position of region of interest (ROI) for evaluating hepatic steatosis using attenuation imaging (ATI) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 143 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy for the evaluation of MAFLD between October 2020 and October 2022. All ATI measurements were performed by the same radiologist. The ATI-ROI was placed at four different positions using a specialized workstation: the top edge of the sampling box (P1), the lower edge of the dark orange region (P2), 0.5 cm and 1 cm below the lower edge of the dark orange region (P3 and P4). Multivariate linear regression analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) analysis were performed.

Results

The AUCs of ATI at the four different ATI-ROI positions were 0.472 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.362–0.581), 0.693(0.611–0.768), 0.757(0.611–0.768), and 0.809 (0.735–0.870) for ≥ S1; 0.544 (0.459–0.628), 0.779 (0.702–0.844), 0.842 (0.772–0.898), and 0.865 (0.798–0.916) for ≥ S2; and 0.655 (0.571–0.733), 0.904 (0.843–0.947), 0.95 (0.9–0.979), and 0.949 (0.9–0.979) for S3, respectively. The factor that most significantly affected ATI was steatosis grade(P<0.001), when ATI-ROI was placed at the position of P2, P3, and P4.

Conclusion

Hepatic steatosis grade was the most significant determinant factor for ATI value at multivariate analysis. When clinicians conduct ATI measurement, the dark orange region indicating the area of reverberation artifact should be avoided, and placing the ATI-ROI 1 cm below the lower edge of the dark orange region may be a better choice.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声衰减成像评价肝脂肪变性的最佳感兴趣区位置的初步研究。
目的:利用衰减成像(ATI)寻找代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MAFLD)患者肝脂肪变性的最佳感兴趣区(ROI)位置。方法:我们回顾性招募了143例连续患者,这些患者在2020年10月至2022年10月期间接受了经皮肝活检以评估MAFLD。所有ATI测量均由同一放射科医生进行。使用专门的工作站将ATI-ROI放置在四个不同的位置:采样盒的上边缘(P1)、暗橙色区域的下边缘(P2)、暗橙色区域下边缘以下0.5 cm和1 cm (P3和P4)。进行多元线性回归分析和曲线下面积(AUC)分析。结果:≥S1时,ATI在4个不同位置的auc分别为0.472(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.362 ~ 0.581)、0.693(0.611 ~ 0.768)、0.757(0.611 ~ 0.768)、0.809 (0.735 ~ 0.870);0.544(0.459 - -0.628), 0.779(0.702 - -0.844), 0.842(0.772 - -0.898),和0.865(0.798 - -0.916)≥S2;S3分别为0.655(0.571 ~ 0.733)、0.904(0.843 ~ 0.947)、0.95(0.9 ~ 0.979)、0.949(0.9 ~ 0.979)。结论:肝脂肪变性分级是影响ATI值最显著的因素。临床医生进行ATI测量时,应避免混响伪影区域的暗橙色区域,将ATI- roi放置在暗橙色区域下缘下方1cm处可能是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1