Predicting variant histology in bladder cancer: the role of multiparametric MRI and vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS)

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04852-9
Serdar Aslan, Merve Nur Tasdemir, Ertugrul Cakir, Ural Oguz, Birgul Tok
{"title":"Predicting variant histology in bladder cancer: the role of multiparametric MRI and vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS)","authors":"Serdar Aslan,&nbsp;Merve Nur Tasdemir,&nbsp;Ertugrul Cakir,&nbsp;Ural Oguz,&nbsp;Birgul Tok","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04852-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>(1) To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in detecting muscle invasion in variant urothelial carcinomas (VUC). (2) To identify spesific MRI features that may serve as predicting for VUC.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two hundred four patients who underwent TUR-B and/or radical cystectomy and a bladder mpMRI scan within three months prior to the procedure were retrospectively enrolled. The tumors were divided into two histological cohorts: pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and VUC. Various MRI features, including largest tumor diameter, long-to-short axis ratio, morphology, heterogeneous signal intensity (SI), presence of necrosis, and normalized ADC (ADC<sub>n</sub>) value, were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in predicting muscle invasion was calculated using a cut-off point of ≥ 4 in both cohorts. Univariate logistic regression were also performed to identify MRI features that predict VUC. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study identified several MRI features significantly associated with VUC, including heterogeneous SI on T2-weighted images (OR: 3.055; 95% CI: 1.312–7.112; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), dynamic contrast enhancement images (OR: 2.935; 95% CI: 1.263–6.821; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the presence of necrosis (OR: 3.575; 95% CI: 1.798–7.107; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, ADC<sub>n</sub> values were significantly lower in the VUC cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.003). The VI-RADS score demonstrated high diagnostic performance across both VUC and PUC cohorts, with sensitivity ranging from 94.4 to 86.8% (reader 1) and 94.2–82.2% (reader 2), specificity ranging from 100 to 94.6% (reader 1) and 100–94% (reader 2), and accuracy ranging from 96 to 90.6% (reader 1) and 96–88.2% (reader 2). The area under the curve (AUC) ranged between 0.972 and 0.972 (reader 1) and 0.838–0.781 (reader 2). No significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed between readers or cohorts (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), and inter-reader agreement for VI-RADS scores was excellent for both cohorts.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>VI-RADS score can be used with high performance to detect muscle invasion in VUC, regardless of reader experience. Additionally, specific MRI features such as heterogeneous SI, the presence of necrosis, and ADC<sub>n</sub> values can serve as potential predictors of VUC.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 10","pages":"4700 - 4711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-025-04852-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04852-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in detecting muscle invasion in variant urothelial carcinomas (VUC). (2) To identify spesific MRI features that may serve as predicting for VUC.

Methods

Two hundred four patients who underwent TUR-B and/or radical cystectomy and a bladder mpMRI scan within three months prior to the procedure were retrospectively enrolled. The tumors were divided into two histological cohorts: pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and VUC. Various MRI features, including largest tumor diameter, long-to-short axis ratio, morphology, heterogeneous signal intensity (SI), presence of necrosis, and normalized ADC (ADCn) value, were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in predicting muscle invasion was calculated using a cut-off point of ≥ 4 in both cohorts. Univariate logistic regression were also performed to identify MRI features that predict VUC. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient.

Results

Our study identified several MRI features significantly associated with VUC, including heterogeneous SI on T2-weighted images (OR: 3.055; 95% CI: 1.312–7.112; p < 0.001), dynamic contrast enhancement images (OR: 2.935; 95% CI: 1.263–6.821; p < 0.001), and the presence of necrosis (OR: 3.575; 95% CI: 1.798–7.107; p < 0.001). Additionally, ADCn values were significantly lower in the VUC cohort (p = 0.003). The VI-RADS score demonstrated high diagnostic performance across both VUC and PUC cohorts, with sensitivity ranging from 94.4 to 86.8% (reader 1) and 94.2–82.2% (reader 2), specificity ranging from 100 to 94.6% (reader 1) and 100–94% (reader 2), and accuracy ranging from 96 to 90.6% (reader 1) and 96–88.2% (reader 2). The area under the curve (AUC) ranged between 0.972 and 0.972 (reader 1) and 0.838–0.781 (reader 2). No significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed between readers or cohorts (p > 0.05), and inter-reader agreement for VI-RADS scores was excellent for both cohorts.

Conclusion

VI-RADS score can be used with high performance to detect muscle invasion in VUC, regardless of reader experience. Additionally, specific MRI features such as heterogeneous SI, the presence of necrosis, and ADCn values can serve as potential predictors of VUC.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测膀胱癌的变异组织学:多参数MRI和膀胱成像报告和数据系统(VI-RADS)的作用。
目的:(1)评价VI-RADS评分对变异性尿路上皮癌(VUC)肌肉侵袭的诊断价值。(2)确定可能作为预测VUC的特异性MRI特征。方法:回顾性研究了244例在手术前3个月内接受turb和/或根治性膀胱切除术和膀胱mpMRI扫描的患者。肿瘤分为两组:纯尿路上皮癌(PUC)和VUC。分析各种MRI特征,包括最大肿瘤直径、长短轴比、形态学、非均质信号强度(SI)、坏死的存在和归一化ADC (ADCn)值。在两个队列中,VI-RADS评分在预测肌肉侵犯方面的诊断性能采用≥4的截断点计算。单变量逻辑回归也用于识别预测VUC的MRI特征。用加权kappa系数评价读者间一致性。结果:我们的研究确定了几种与VUC显著相关的MRI特征,包括t2加权图像上的异质性SI (OR: 3.055;95% ci: 1.312-7.112;在VUC队列中,p n值显著降低(p = 0.003)。VI-RADS评分在VUC和PUC队列中均表现出较高的诊断性能,灵敏度为94.4 - 86.8%(阅读器1)和94.2-82.2%(阅读器2),特异性为100- 94.6%(阅读器1)和100-94%(阅读器2)。准确率在96 ~ 90.6%(阅读器1)和96 ~ 88.2%(阅读器2)之间。曲线下面积(AUC)范围在0.972 ~ 0.972(阅读器1)和0.838 ~ 0.781(阅读器2)之间。阅读器和队列之间的诊断性能无显著差异(p < 0.05),阅读器间VI-RADS评分的一致性在两个队列中都很好。结论:无论读者体验如何,VI-RADS评分均可高效检测VUC的肌肉侵犯情况。此外,特定的MRI特征,如非均匀SI、坏死的存在和ADCn值可以作为VUC的潜在预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1