Investigating the evolution and features of regeneration using cnidarians.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Integrative and Comparative Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1093/icb/icaf006
Aide Macias-Muñoz
{"title":"Investigating the evolution and features of regeneration using cnidarians.","authors":"Aide Macias-Muñoz","doi":"10.1093/icb/icaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to regenerate can greatly vary between animal groups and cell types. Some of the outstanding questions in the field of regeneration include: (1) How has regeneration evolved? and (2) What features underlie differences in regeneration potential between animals? Whether regeneration evolved once and diversified or if it evolved multiple times independently by co-opting similar pathways remains unknown. Current research seeks to identify conserved cellular and molecular features that allow for regeneration. However, comparisons between distantly related regenerating animals have revealed a large amount of diversity. In this perspective, I review discussions on the mechanisms, cell types, and genes underlying regeneration. I propose using Cnidaria as a group in which to investigate the evolution of regeneration. As the sister group to Bilateria with notable regenerative capacity, studies in Cnidaria offer insights into the evolutionary history and conservation of regenerative mechanisms. I then highlight how genome-wide studies, single-cell genomics, multi-omics, and gene editing can be used to identify cell types and unknown features of regeneration. Applying these approaches across organisms will give insight into the cell and molecular features that allow for regeneration competency and may be used to alter an organism's regeneration potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":54971,"journal":{"name":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","volume":" ","pages":"713-726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to regenerate can greatly vary between animal groups and cell types. Some of the outstanding questions in the field of regeneration include: (1) How has regeneration evolved? and (2) What features underlie differences in regeneration potential between animals? Whether regeneration evolved once and diversified or if it evolved multiple times independently by co-opting similar pathways remains unknown. Current research seeks to identify conserved cellular and molecular features that allow for regeneration. However, comparisons between distantly related regenerating animals have revealed a large amount of diversity. In this perspective, I review discussions on the mechanisms, cell types, and genes underlying regeneration. I propose using Cnidaria as a group in which to investigate the evolution of regeneration. As the sister group to Bilateria with notable regenerative capacity, studies in Cnidaria offer insights into the evolutionary history and conservation of regenerative mechanisms. I then highlight how genome-wide studies, single-cell genomics, multi-omics, and gene editing can be used to identify cell types and unknown features of regeneration. Applying these approaches across organisms will give insight into the cell and molecular features that allow for regeneration competency and may be used to alter an organism's regeneration potential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺胞动物再生的进化与特征研究。
再生能力在不同的动物群体和细胞类型之间差别很大。再生领域的一些突出问题包括:1)再生是如何进化的?2)动物之间再生潜能的差异背后的特征是什么?再生是一次进化并多样化,还是通过选择相似的途径独立进化多次,目前尚不清楚。目前的研究旨在确定允许再生的保守的细胞和分子特征。然而,在远亲再生动物之间的比较揭示了大量的多样性。从这个角度来看,我回顾了关于再生机制、细胞类型和基因的讨论。我建议使用刺胞菌作为研究再生进化的一个群体。作为具有显著再生能力的双边门的姐妹类群,对刺胞菌的研究提供了对再生机制的进化史和保护的见解。然后,我强调了如何使用全基因组研究、单细胞基因组学、多组学和基因编辑来识别细胞类型和再生的未知特征。将这些方法应用于生物体将使我们深入了解允许再生能力的细胞和分子特征,并可能用于改变生物体的再生潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative and Comparative Biology ( ICB ), formerly American Zoologist , is one of the most highly respected and cited journals in the field of biology. The journal''s primary focus is to integrate the varying disciplines in this broad field, while maintaining the highest scientific quality. ICB''s peer-reviewed symposia provide first class syntheses of the top research in a field. ICB also publishes book reviews, reports, and special bulletins.
期刊最新文献
Integrating complex environments to reveal integrated phenotypes by cryptic developmental plasticity. Integrating field capture and flight tunnel analysis to study echolocation-guided flight in bats. A framework for estimating climate change vulnerability based on conditional relationships. Morphological relationships of pectoral and dorsal spines of invasive blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus, over ontogeny. How Small, Arboreal Lizards Run on Water: Surface Tension, Morphology, Behavior and Kinematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1