Ensemble machine learning (EML) based regional flood frequency analysis model development and testing for south-east Australia

IF 5 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102320
Nilufa Afrin , Ataur Rahman , Ahmad Sharafati , Farhad Ahamed , Khaled Haddad
{"title":"Ensemble machine learning (EML) based regional flood frequency analysis model development and testing for south-east Australia","authors":"Nilufa Afrin ,&nbsp;Ataur Rahman ,&nbsp;Ahmad Sharafati ,&nbsp;Farhad Ahamed ,&nbsp;Khaled Haddad","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>South-east Australia</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>This study develops two ensemble-based regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) techniques, Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR)) with a standalone method (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), for south-east Australia. A dataset from 201 catchments across south-east Australia is used in this study. It includes six Annual Exceedance Probabilities (AEPs), 1 in 2, 1 in 5, 1 in 10, 1 in 20, 1 in 50, and 1 in 100 to estimate design floods, which are widely used in the planning and design of water infrastructure. An independent test is adopted to compare the performance of the selected RFFA techniques.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights for the region</h3><div>This study employs a random forest (RF) algorithm as a nonlinear feature selection method to select the important features/catchment characteristics (predictors) in the RFFA. Out of the eight candidate predictors, three are selected to develop and test the selected RFFA techniques. The findings indicate that ensemble methods (RFR and GBR) provide better performance than the standalone ANN technique. The median relative error values are found to be in the range of 33–44 % for the RFR, 34–46 % for the GBR, and 35–53 % for the ANN. The results of this study would be useful in upgrading RFFA methods in the Australian Rainfall and Runoff (national guideline).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825001442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study region

South-east Australia

Study focus

This study develops two ensemble-based regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) techniques, Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR)) with a standalone method (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), for south-east Australia. A dataset from 201 catchments across south-east Australia is used in this study. It includes six Annual Exceedance Probabilities (AEPs), 1 in 2, 1 in 5, 1 in 10, 1 in 20, 1 in 50, and 1 in 100 to estimate design floods, which are widely used in the planning and design of water infrastructure. An independent test is adopted to compare the performance of the selected RFFA techniques.

New hydrological insights for the region

This study employs a random forest (RF) algorithm as a nonlinear feature selection method to select the important features/catchment characteristics (predictors) in the RFFA. Out of the eight candidate predictors, three are selected to develop and test the selected RFFA techniques. The findings indicate that ensemble methods (RFR and GBR) provide better performance than the standalone ANN technique. The median relative error values are found to be in the range of 33–44 % for the RFR, 34–46 % for the GBR, and 35–53 % for the ANN. The results of this study would be useful in upgrading RFFA methods in the Australian Rainfall and Runoff (national guideline).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于集成机器学习(EML)的澳大利亚东南部区域洪水频率分析模型开发与测试
本研究针对澳大利亚东南部开发了两种基于集合的区域洪水频率分析(RFFA)技术,即随机森林回归(RFR)和梯度增强回归(GBR),采用独立的方法(人工神经网络(ANN))。本研究使用了来自澳大利亚东南部201个集水区的数据集。它包括6种年度超过概率(AEPs), 1 / 2、1 / 5、1 / 10、1 / 20、1 / 50和1 / 100来估计设计洪水,广泛用于水利基础设施的规划和设计。采用独立测试来比较所选RFFA技术的性能。本研究采用随机森林(RF)算法作为非线性特征选择方法来选择RFFA中的重要特征/流域特征(预测因子)。在八个候选预测因子中,选择三个来开发和测试所选的RFFA技术。研究结果表明,集成方法(RFR和GBR)比独立的人工神经网络技术提供了更好的性能。RFR的中位相对误差值为33-44 %,GBR为34-46 %,ANN为35-53 %。本研究的结果将有助于改进RFFA方法在澳大利亚降雨和径流(国家指南)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
期刊最新文献
SynxFlow-based urban pluvial flood simulation and sensitivity evaluation in the central urban area of Shenzhen Assessment of flood susceptibility in Minab County, Iran, through the integration of topographic, climatic, and land-surface indices using ensemble machine learning models Transferability of machine/deep learning-based prediction of fluvial flood extent to distinct river sections in Slovakia based on benchmark flood maps and high-resolution spatial data Water detention structures as a flood mitigation strategy: A case study of the Elgin Creek Basin Cascading response mechanisms of multi-aquifer groundwater levels and land deformation driven by precipitation and anthropogenic disturbances: Insights from the Beijing Plain, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1