Comparative modeling of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine from Coptis teeta Wall. rhizomes†

Lopamudra Sarma, Falguni Patra, Pallab Kumar Borah, Sunil Meena and Raj Kumar Duary
{"title":"Comparative modeling of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine from Coptis teeta Wall. rhizomes†","authors":"Lopamudra Sarma, Falguni Patra, Pallab Kumar Borah, Sunil Meena and Raj Kumar Duary","doi":"10.1039/D4FB00382A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >\r\n <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals with significant applications in the food and nutraceutical industries. Standardized methods and solvent compositions are crucial to sustainably maximize bioactive yield while ensuring industrial feasibility. This study models and compares microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine – the primary active alkaloid in <em>Coptis teeta</em> rhizomes. Previous studies on extracting phytochemicals from <em>Coptis teeta</em> have relied on the central composite design, which is limited in handling multiple independent variables. To address this limitation, a Box–Behnken design along with a response surface method was utilized, where independent variables included the solvent concentration (water : methanol), power level, extraction time, and solid–liquid ratio, and dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity. The results showed that for MAE, using 65% solvent concentration, 310 W power, 30 min extraction time, and 1 : 39 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 210.04 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and antioxidant activity of 98.57%. Whereas for UAE, 36% solvent concentration, 160 W ultrasound power, 10 min extraction time, and 1 : 78 g mL<small><sup>−1</sup></small> solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 251.11 mg GAE 100 g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and 97.82% antioxidant activity. Berberine concentration in MAE extract was 212.18 ppm, whereas it was 162.96 ppm in UAE extract. While MAE yielded a higher berberine content, UAE was superior in extracting total phenolics. The findings provide a foundation for developing standardized methods and solvent compositions suitable for food and nutraceutical formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101198,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Food Technology","volume":" 2","pages":" 570-581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/fb/d4fb00382a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fb/d4fb00382a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coptis teeta rhizomes are a rich source of bioactive phytochemicals with significant applications in the food and nutraceutical industries. Standardized methods and solvent compositions are crucial to sustainably maximize bioactive yield while ensuring industrial feasibility. This study models and compares microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) assisted extraction of phenolics and berberine – the primary active alkaloid in Coptis teeta rhizomes. Previous studies on extracting phytochemicals from Coptis teeta have relied on the central composite design, which is limited in handling multiple independent variables. To address this limitation, a Box–Behnken design along with a response surface method was utilized, where independent variables included the solvent concentration (water : methanol), power level, extraction time, and solid–liquid ratio, and dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity. The results showed that for MAE, using 65% solvent concentration, 310 W power, 30 min extraction time, and 1 : 39 g mL−1 solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 210.04 mg GAE 100 g−1 and antioxidant activity of 98.57%. Whereas for UAE, 36% solvent concentration, 160 W ultrasound power, 10 min extraction time, and 1 : 78 g mL−1 solid–liquid ratio resulted in a TPC of 251.11 mg GAE 100 g−1 and 97.82% antioxidant activity. Berberine concentration in MAE extract was 212.18 ppm, whereas it was 162.96 ppm in UAE extract. While MAE yielded a higher berberine content, UAE was superior in extracting total phenolics. The findings provide a foundation for developing standardized methods and solvent compositions suitable for food and nutraceutical formulations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微波和超声波辅助萃取黄连中酚类化合物和小檗碱的比较模型†。
黄连根茎是一种富含生物活性的植物化学物质,在食品和营养保健工业中有着重要的应用。标准化的方法和溶剂组成对于在确保工业可行性的同时可持续地最大化生物活性产量至关重要。本研究模拟并比较了微波(MAE)和超声(UAE)辅助提取黄连根茎中主要活性生物碱类物质和小檗碱的方法。以往对黄连植物化学成分提取的研究主要依赖于中心复合设计,该设计在处理多个自变量时受到限制。为了解决这一局限性,采用Box-Behnken设计和响应面法,其中自变量包括溶剂浓度(水:甲醇)、功率水平、提取时间和料液比,因变量为总酚含量(TPC)和抗氧化活性。结果表明,在溶剂浓度为65%、功率为310 W、萃取时间为30 min、料液比为1:39 g mL−1的条件下,MAE的TPC为210.04 mg GAE 100 g−1,抗氧化活性为98.57%。36%的溶剂浓度、160 W的超声功率、10 min的提取时间、1:8 8 g mL−1的料液比条件下,UAE的TPC为251.11 mg GAE 100 g−1,抗氧化活性为97.82%。MAE提取物中小檗碱含量为212.18 ppm, UAE提取物中小檗碱含量为162.96 ppm。MAE提取的小檗碱含量较高,UAE提取的总酚含量较高。研究结果为制定食品和营养保健品配方的标准化方法和溶剂组成提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microencapsulation of red palm oil with soy protein concentrate–carrageenan conjugates for compound dark chocolate applications Potato peel-based PBS/PBAT biocomposites: influence of composition and filler content on injection molded properties Formulation and characterization of basil-flavoured oat-based milk substitute ice cream as a sustainable alternative to dairy ice cream Sustainable valorization of fish byproducts and acid whey through lactic acid bacteria fermentation into bioactive hydrolysates Characterisation of water-soluble Nannochloropsis oceanica protein fractions: physical and functional properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1