Kinetic Pattern Recognition in Home-Based Knee Rehabilitation Using Machine Learning Clustering Methods on the Slider Digital Physiotherapy Device: Prospective Observational Study.
{"title":"Kinetic Pattern Recognition in Home-Based Knee Rehabilitation Using Machine Learning Clustering Methods on the Slider Digital Physiotherapy Device: Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Clement Twumasi, Mikail Aktas, Nicholas Santoni","doi":"10.2196/69150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in rehabilitation sciences have progressively used computational techniques to improve diagnostic and treatment approaches. However, the analysis of high-dimensional, time-dependent data continues to pose a significant problem. Prior research has used clustering techniques on rehabilitation data to identify movement patterns and forecast recovery outcomes. Nonetheless, these initiatives have not yet used force or motion datasets obtained outside a clinical setting, thereby limiting the capacity for therapeutic decisions. Biomechanical data analysis has demonstrated considerable potential in bridging these gaps and improving clinical decision-making in rehabilitation settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive clustering analysis of multidimensional movement datasets captured using a novel home exercise device, the \"Slider\". The aim is to identify clinically relevant movement patterns and provide answers to open research questions for the first time to inform personalized rehabilitation protocols, predict individual recovery trajectories, and assess the risks of potential postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-dimensional, time-dependent, bilateral knee kinetic datasets were independently analyzed from 32 participants using four unsupervised clustering techniques: k-means, hierarchical clustering, partition around medoids, and CLARA (Clustering Large Applications). The data comprised force, laser-measured distance, and optical tracker coordinates from lower limb activities. The optimal clusters identified through the unsupervised clustering methods were further evaluated and compared using silhouette analysis to quantify their performance. Key determinants of cluster membership were assessed, including demographic factors (eg, gender, BMI, and age) and pain levels, by using a logistic regression model with analysis of covariance adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct, time-varying movement patterns or clusters were identified for each knee. Hierarchical clustering performed best for the right knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.637), while CLARA was the most effective for the left knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.598). Key predictors of the movement cluster membership were discovered for both knees. BMI was the most influential determinant of cluster membership for the right knee, where higher BMI decreased the odds of cluster-2 membership (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96; P<.001) but increased the odds for cluster-3 assignment relative to cluster 1 (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P<.001). For the left knee, all predictors of cluster-2 membership were significant (.001≤P≤.008), whereas only BMI (P=.81) could not predict the likelihood of an individual belonging to cluster 3 compared to cluster 1. Gender was the strongest determinant for the left knee, with male participants significantly likely to belong to cluster 3 (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.91-4.27; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These kinetic patterns offer significant insights for creating personalized rehabilitation procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes. These findings underscore the efficacy of unsupervised clustering techniques in the analysis of biomechanical data for clinical rehabilitation applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e69150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent advancements in rehabilitation sciences have progressively used computational techniques to improve diagnostic and treatment approaches. However, the analysis of high-dimensional, time-dependent data continues to pose a significant problem. Prior research has used clustering techniques on rehabilitation data to identify movement patterns and forecast recovery outcomes. Nonetheless, these initiatives have not yet used force or motion datasets obtained outside a clinical setting, thereby limiting the capacity for therapeutic decisions. Biomechanical data analysis has demonstrated considerable potential in bridging these gaps and improving clinical decision-making in rehabilitation settings.
Objective: This study presents a comprehensive clustering analysis of multidimensional movement datasets captured using a novel home exercise device, the "Slider". The aim is to identify clinically relevant movement patterns and provide answers to open research questions for the first time to inform personalized rehabilitation protocols, predict individual recovery trajectories, and assess the risks of potential postoperative complications.
Methods: High-dimensional, time-dependent, bilateral knee kinetic datasets were independently analyzed from 32 participants using four unsupervised clustering techniques: k-means, hierarchical clustering, partition around medoids, and CLARA (Clustering Large Applications). The data comprised force, laser-measured distance, and optical tracker coordinates from lower limb activities. The optimal clusters identified through the unsupervised clustering methods were further evaluated and compared using silhouette analysis to quantify their performance. Key determinants of cluster membership were assessed, including demographic factors (eg, gender, BMI, and age) and pain levels, by using a logistic regression model with analysis of covariance adjustment.
Results: Three distinct, time-varying movement patterns or clusters were identified for each knee. Hierarchical clustering performed best for the right knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.637), while CLARA was the most effective for the left knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.598). Key predictors of the movement cluster membership were discovered for both knees. BMI was the most influential determinant of cluster membership for the right knee, where higher BMI decreased the odds of cluster-2 membership (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96; P<.001) but increased the odds for cluster-3 assignment relative to cluster 1 (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P<.001). For the left knee, all predictors of cluster-2 membership were significant (.001≤P≤.008), whereas only BMI (P=.81) could not predict the likelihood of an individual belonging to cluster 3 compared to cluster 1. Gender was the strongest determinant for the left knee, with male participants significantly likely to belong to cluster 3 (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.91-4.27; P<.001).
Conclusions: These kinetic patterns offer significant insights for creating personalized rehabilitation procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes. These findings underscore the efficacy of unsupervised clustering techniques in the analysis of biomechanical data for clinical rehabilitation applications.
背景:近年来,在康复科学的进步,逐步使用计算技术来改善诊断和治疗方法。然而,对高维、时变数据的分析仍然是一个重大问题。先前的研究使用聚类技术对康复数据进行识别运动模式和预测康复结果。尽管如此,这些举措尚未使用在临床环境之外获得的力量或运动数据集,从而限制了治疗决策的能力。生物力学数据分析在弥合这些差距和改善康复环境中的临床决策方面显示出相当大的潜力。目的:本研究对使用新型家庭运动设备“Slider”捕获的多维运动数据集进行了全面的聚类分析。目的是确定临床相关的运动模式,并首次为开放性研究问题提供答案,为个性化康复方案提供信息,预测个体恢复轨迹,并评估潜在术后并发症的风险。方法:使用四种无监督聚类技术对32名参与者的高维、时间相关的双侧膝关节动力学数据集进行独立分析:k-means、分层聚类、围绕中间点划分和CLARA(聚类大应用)。这些数据包括力、激光测量的距离和下肢活动的光学跟踪坐标。通过无监督聚类方法确定的最优聚类进一步进行评估和比较,并使用轮廓分析来量化其性能。通过采用协方差调整分析的逻辑回归模型,评估集群成员的关键决定因素,包括人口统计学因素(如性别、BMI和年龄)和疼痛水平。结果:三个不同的,时变的运动模式或集群被确定为每个膝盖。分层聚类对右膝数据集表现最好(平均轮廓得分为0.637),而CLARA对左膝数据集最有效(平均轮廓得分为0.598)。发现了双膝运动簇成员的关键预测因子。BMI是右膝患者加入集群最重要的决定因素,BMI越高,加入集群2的几率越低(比值比[OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96;结论:这些运动模式为创建个性化康复程序提供了重要的见解,可能改善患者的预后。这些发现强调了无监督聚类技术在临床康复应用的生物力学数据分析中的有效性。