Dissociation of value and confidence signals in the orbitofrontal cortex during decision-making: an intracerebral electrophysiology study in humans.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-24.2025
Thelma Landron, Alizée Lopez-Persem, Philippe Domenech, Katia Lehongre, Vincent Navarro, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Mathias Pessiglione
{"title":"Dissociation of value and confidence signals in the orbitofrontal cortex during decision-making: an intracerebral electrophysiology study in humans.","authors":"Thelma Landron, Alizée Lopez-Persem, Philippe Domenech, Katia Lehongre, Vincent Navarro, Sylvain Rheims, Philippe Kahane, Julien Bastin, Mathias Pessiglione","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-24.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some decisions, such as selecting a food item in a novel menu, are not based on rational norms, or on trained habits, but on subjective preferences. How the human brain makes these preference-based decisions is still debated in cognitive neuroscience. Classical models focus on the comparison mechanism that achieves the selection of the option with best expected value. Recent models suggest that estimates of option values are refined until reaching sufficient confidence in the considered choice. Neuroimaging studies in humans and electrophysiology studies in animals have gathered evidence that value and confidence estimates are both represented in medial and lateral regions of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Here, we took advantage of electrodes implanted within the OFC of human patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy (14 women, 12 men) to investigate whether value and confidence estimates can be dissociated in electrophysiology activity recorded during preference-based binary decisions. The overall value (liking ratings summed over options) and choice confidence (selection probability of the chosen option) were identified in low-frequency (4-8 Hz) OFC activity. These value and confidence signals were time-locked to the decision, showed opposite signs of correlation and were recorded in separate sites. This pattern of results is not consistent with the simulations of an attractor neural network model implementing a comparison of option values. However, it is compatible with the notion of a neural network generating sparse representations of option values and choice confidence estimates, based on which decisions can be made.<b>Significance statement</b> The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is known to play a critical role in decisions based on subjective preferences, such as choosing between food items in a menu. However, the information provided by the human OFC has remained elusive, due to limitations of neuroimaging techniques. Here, taking advantage of electrodes implanted in patients for clinical purposes, we present a rare dataset of electrophysiological activity recorded during preference-based decisions. Our analyses suggest that the OFC signals two distinct constructs on which decisions could be based: the subjective values of available options and the confidence in the intended choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-24.2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some decisions, such as selecting a food item in a novel menu, are not based on rational norms, or on trained habits, but on subjective preferences. How the human brain makes these preference-based decisions is still debated in cognitive neuroscience. Classical models focus on the comparison mechanism that achieves the selection of the option with best expected value. Recent models suggest that estimates of option values are refined until reaching sufficient confidence in the considered choice. Neuroimaging studies in humans and electrophysiology studies in animals have gathered evidence that value and confidence estimates are both represented in medial and lateral regions of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Here, we took advantage of electrodes implanted within the OFC of human patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy (14 women, 12 men) to investigate whether value and confidence estimates can be dissociated in electrophysiology activity recorded during preference-based binary decisions. The overall value (liking ratings summed over options) and choice confidence (selection probability of the chosen option) were identified in low-frequency (4-8 Hz) OFC activity. These value and confidence signals were time-locked to the decision, showed opposite signs of correlation and were recorded in separate sites. This pattern of results is not consistent with the simulations of an attractor neural network model implementing a comparison of option values. However, it is compatible with the notion of a neural network generating sparse representations of option values and choice confidence estimates, based on which decisions can be made.Significance statement The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is known to play a critical role in decisions based on subjective preferences, such as choosing between food items in a menu. However, the information provided by the human OFC has remained elusive, due to limitations of neuroimaging techniques. Here, taking advantage of electrodes implanted in patients for clinical purposes, we present a rare dataset of electrophysiological activity recorded during preference-based decisions. Our analyses suggest that the OFC signals two distinct constructs on which decisions could be based: the subjective values of available options and the confidence in the intended choice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有些决定,如在新菜单上选择食品,不是基于理性规范或训练有素的习惯,而是基于主观偏好。人脑是如何做出这些基于偏好的决定的,认知神经科学领域仍存在争议。经典模型侧重于比较机制,以实现选择具有最佳预期值的选项。最新的模型表明,对选项价值的估计会不断完善,直到对所考虑的选择有足够的信心。人类的神经影像学研究和动物的电生理学研究已经收集到证据,证明价值和置信度估计都在眶额叶皮层(OFC)的内侧和外侧区域有所体现。在此,我们利用植入药理耐受性癫痫患者(14 名女性,12 名男性)眶额皮层的电极,研究了在基于偏好的二元决策过程中记录的电生理活动中,价值和置信度估计是否可以分离。研究人员在低频(4-8赫兹)OFC活动中识别了总体价值(对所有选项的喜好度总和)和选择置信度(所选选项的选择概率)。这些价值和信心信号与决策的时间锁定,显示出相反的相关性,并且记录在不同的部位。这种结果模式与实施选项价值比较的吸引子神经网络模型模拟不一致。意义说明 众所周知,眶额皮层(OFC)在基于主观偏好的决策中起着至关重要的作用,例如在菜单中的食物之间做出选择。然而,由于神经成像技术的限制,人类眶额皮层提供的信息一直难以捉摸。在这里,我们利用为临床目的而植入患者体内的电极,展示了一个罕见的在基于偏好的决策过程中记录电生理活动的数据集。我们的分析表明,OFC 信号可作为决策依据的两个不同结构:可用选项的主观价值和对预期选择的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
Contractions in human cerebellar-cortical manifold structure underlie motor reinforcement learning. Methylphenidate promotes a frontoparietal-dominant brain state improving cognitive performance: a randomized trial. Dissociation of value and confidence signals in the orbitofrontal cortex during decision-making: an intracerebral electrophysiology study in humans. Time-dependent Actions of Corticosterone on Infralimbic Cortex Pyramidal Neurons of Adult Male Rats. Neural dynamics of reselecting visual and motor contents in working memory after external interference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1